Browse the Latest How To's

You probably already know what you need to do, we help you with the how

All
Content and Communications
Career
Marketing Operations
Demand Generation
MarTech
All
Content and Communications
Career
Marketing Operations
Demand Generation
MarTech
woman screaming at journalist until shes blue in the face

How to use PR to build credibility in B2B

In my experience, most PR underperforms for one simple reason. It is built to generate coverage, not influence.

Press releases go out. Coverage appears. Logos get dropped into decks. Somewhere along the way, teams convince themselves that visibility equals impact.

It does not.

In complex B2B buying, nobody buys because they saw your logo in the trade press. They buy because choosing you feels safe, defensible, and sensible to the people who have to put their names against the decision.

PR only works when it reduces risk. When it does not, it becomes noise.

What PR is actually for in B2B

PR is not about announcements or press releases (I am not even sure journalists read them anymore). It is not about share of voice. It is not about chasing journalists for coverage.

In our world, PR exists to build external credibility that buyers can borrow internally.

When a deal is live, buying group members are quietly asking themselves variations of:

  • Are these people legitimate?

  • Do they understand our world?

  • Have others trusted them before?

  • Would I look foolish defending this choice internally?

This aligns closely with buying group research from Gartner, which shows that deals stall far more often due to lack of confidence and consensus than lack of information. PR contributes to what Gartner calls sense making. It helps groups align around whether a decision feels safe.

So from that viewpoint, PR is another tool in the arsenal that helps do that job.

PR is not the same as media relations

One reason PR disappoints is because it is often reduced to media relations alone.

It actually includes:

  • Media commentary

  • Executive visibility

  • Analyst relations

  • Third party validation

  • Consistent narrative across external touchpoints

  • Media coverage is just one output. Credibility is the outcome.

You can get plenty of coverage and still be ignored in deals if what you say sounds generic, inconsistent, or self-congratulatory.

Why most B2B PR fails

Most B2B PR fails in predictable ways.

  • It sounds like marketing

  • It talks about the company, not the problem

  • It overclaims and underexplains

  • It avoids trade-offs and reality

  • It focuses on announcements that only matter to that firm, rather than insight for anybody else

This is why buyers skim it or ignore it entirely. They are not looking for promotion. They are looking for reassurance.

Research from the Edelman Trust Barometer consistently shows that people trust expertise, transparency, and third-party validation far more than corporate messaging. PR that feels polished but empty actively erodes trust.

What is actually newsworthy in B2B

Most B2B companies are not newsworthy because they exist. They become newsworthy when they help others make sense of change.

What journalists and buyers actually care about:

  • What is changing in the market?

  • What is breaking or no longer working?

  • What leaders are seeing that others are missing?

  • What trade-offs organizations are facing?

  • What mistakes are being repeated?

This is why commentary outperforms announcements. Insight travels further than information.

If your PR plan is built around what you want to say rather than what your market is struggling to understand, it will not perform. It simply adds to the plethora of noise that is already out there.

Credibility is built through consistency, not volume

Buyers do not remember one article. They remember patterns.

This is where mental availability matters. Research from the B2B Institute shows that brands grow by being consistently associated with specific problems and outcomes over time.

Effective PR reinforces the same story across:

  • Executive interviews

  • Bylined articles

  • Panel appearances

  • Analyst commentary

  • Partner quotes

If each appearance tells a slightly different version of who you are, or if different executives say conflicting things, you are not building credibility, you are creating friction.

Reality check
If your CEO sounds visionary, your CTO sounds tactical, your PR agency sounds promotional, and your sales team sounds defensive, buyers will trust none of them.

How PR actually supports live deals

PR will never close deals directly, of course, but bad PR can lose it.

It can make sales conversations easier.

Good PR helps when:

  • Prospects already recognize your name

  • Stakeholders reference your perspective unprompted

  • Objections sound familiar rather than hostile

  • Sales spends less time proving legitimacy

This aligns with Forrester guidance on executive thought leadership, which emphasizes that credibility shortens evaluation cycles by reducing perceived risk.

PR works best when sales does not have to explain it.

How to tell if your PR is building credibility

If you want a simple diagnostic, ask these questions:

  • Would a journalist describe us as experts in one specific thing?

  • Do our leaders sound consistent across interviews?

  • Does sales ever forward this coverage without being asked?

  • Would a cautious buyer feel safer after reading this?

If the answer is no, the issue is not distribution it is a lack of substance.

How to measure PR without pretending attribution

PR does not lend itself to last click attribution and pretending otherwise damages its credibility internally.

Avoid over relying on:

  • Raw coverage volume

  • Share of voice without context

  • Generic sentiment scores

  • Last click revenue models

Instead, look for signals that confidence is forming:

  • Sales referencing coverage in meetings

  • Increased inbound credibility rather than inbound volume

  • Faster movement through late-stage objections

  • Analyst inclusion and citation

  • Executives being sought out for perspective

PR should be discussed in the language of influence, not performance marketing.

The simple rule to remember

PR in B2B is not about being visible. It is about being believable.

If your PR helps buyers feel safer choosing you and helps sales spend less time proving legitimacy, it is working. If it just fills a coverage report, it is not. Especially if you don’t actually recognise the publications who picked up your press release verbatim.

Call to action

Audit your last six months of PR and ask one hard question.

If a cautious buyer read this, would they feel more confident choosing us?

If the answer is unclear, stop producing more content and fix the narrative first.

  • Decide what you want to be trusted for.

  • Ensure your leaders sound consistent.

  • Prioritize insight over announcements.

  • Measure confidence, not clicks.

If you want help turning PR into a credibility engine rather than a coverage machine, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Feb 8, 2026

5 min read

How to avoid catching Social Influenza

The lyrics of "Social Influenza" paint a dystopian picture of our modern condition: a feverish need for validation, a contagion of comparison, and the exhausting static of a life lived for the feed. The song warns of a sickness where we develop a craving for performance theater and an addiction to meaningless likes and comments.

For B2B marketers, LinkedIn is Ground Zero for this outbreak.

We are under constant pressure to optimize, to influence, and to "add value" until we are empty. The pressure to be a "Top Voice" can quickly mutate into a professional illness. This is the Social Influenza.

It starts with a slight fever of anxiety when you haven't posted in 24 hours and ends with full-blown Corporate Dysmorphia: the sickening gap between the human you are and the polished, hustle-culture avatar sufferers feel they need to present online.

If you find yourself posting "inspirational" stories about your morning coffee or using the phrase "delighted to announce" with a sinking feeling in your stomach, you may already be infected. If you want to survive the platform without losing your soul, you need to understand the pathology of the disease.

Here is your chart for diagnosis, treatment, and recovery.

Part I: The Pathology

The virus mutates quickly. In the B2B ward, we are currently seeing seven distinct variants of the influenza. You must learn to spot them in your feed, and, more importantly, in your own drafts.

Strain 1: The "Hustle Fever"

  • The Symptom: This is the inability to rest. You feel a burning compulsion to post seven days a week because "the algorithm demands consistency." You start measuring your self-worth by impression metrics rather than actual business conversations. You are burning up, generating heat but no light.

  • The Cure: Treat LinkedIn like a potent antibiotic, not a daily buffet. One or two insightful posts a week will always outperform seven days of empty noise. Your goal is resonance, not volume.

Strain 2: Buzzword Delirium

  • The Symptom: The virus attacks the language centers of the brain. You lose the ability to speak like a human. Suddenly, you aren't "solving problems"; you are "leveraging synergistic paradigms to unlock granular value adds." You are writing to sound smart, which inevitably makes you sound infected.

  • The Cure: Read your draft post out loud. If you wouldn't say those exact words to a friend at a bar (or a colleague over coffee) without getting laughed at, delete them. Write for humans, not for the "thought leader" persona.

Strain 3: The "Bro-etry" Spasms

  • The Symptom: This respiratory issue forces the writer to speak in short. Staccato. Sentences. You find yourself physically unable to write a paragraph. You break every sentence into its own line to "stop the scroll." You start posts with dramatic hooks like "I almost lost everything..." only to pivot into a banal tip about email open rates.

  • The Cure: Respect the Paragraph. Trust that your audience is intelligent enough to read three sentences grouped together. If your insight is actually valuable, you don't need to dress it up in the costume of a dramatic revelation.

Strain 4: Engagement Bait Nausea

  • The Symptom: You post polarizing or overly personal content solely to trigger the dopamine hit of the "comments" section. You ask questions you don't care about ("Agree?") just to boost the numbers. You feel a sinking sensation in your stomach because you know you are prioritizing the algorithm over your integrity.

  • The Cure: Intentionality. Before every post, ask: Does this actually help my prospect, or does it just feed my ego?If the answer is ego, keep it in the drafts. It is actually a very impressive trait to be able to talk yourself back from the ledge; it is not wasted time.

Strain 5: The "Tag-You’re-It" Rash

  • The Symptom: A highly contagious strain where the infected attempts to force the virus onto others. You finish a mediocre post and tag 30 people in the comments with the caption "Thoughts?" These people have no relation to the topic, but you need their "clout" to simulate a fever of engagement.

  • The Cure: Only tag someone if you are specifically quoting them or if you have a pre-existing relationship where they expect to be brought into the conversation. Do not sneeze on strangers to get their attention.

Strain 6: The "ChatGPT" Pallor

  • The Symptom: The infection takes over the brain completely, replacing independent thought with a gray, lifeless simulation. You stare at someone else’s post and realize you have nothing to say, so you generate a comment: "Great insights, [Name]! Synergy is indeed key." You become part of the perfect breeding ground for the virus to multiply and mutate.

  • The Cure: If you can't write a 50-word comment yourself, write a 5-word comment that is actually true. "This specific point resonates because" carries more weight than three paragraphs of AI slop.

Strain 7: Toxic Positivity Paralysis

  • The Symptom: The most dangerous strain, characterized by the inability to experience a human emotion without calculating its ROI. You suffer a personal tragedy, but before you can even process the grief, you are already mentally drafting the LinkedIn post about "resilience." You see your own life not as an experience to be lived, but as raw material to be mined for "lessons." You have become a content parasite on your own soul.

  • The Cure: Reclaim your humanity by refusing to monetize your suffering. Sometimes, a bad quarter is just a bad quarter, not a "failing forward" masterclass. Silence is an immune booster. It allows you to heal offline so you can return online as a person, not a carcass of content.

Strain 8: Circadian Grindset Syndrome

  • The Symptom: You jolt awake at 3:45 AM, cortisol spiking, convinced that if you sleep until 7:00 AM, you have already "lost" the day to your competitors. You drag yourself to the gym not for health, but to take a blurry photo of the squat rack or your watch face with the caption "Rise and Grind." You are sleep-deprived, hallucinating success, and mistaking exhaustion for dedication.

  • The Cure: High performance requires recovery, not deprivation. Unless you are training for the Olympics or operating a dairy farm, you do not need to be up at 4:00 AM. Sleep is a productivity tool. Your net worth is not tied to your alarm clock settings.

Part II: Building Immunity

The song lyrics speak to the desire to "escape" or "shut down." You likely cannot delete LinkedIn if it is your livelihood, but you can build a Hazmat suit to wear while you work.

1. Create a "Quarantine Zone" Social Influenza spreads when you let the platform dictate your schedule.

  • The Protocol: Turn off all LinkedIn notifications on your phone. All of them. Check the platform only during designated "work windows" (e.g., 9:00 AM to 9:30 AM). Do not let the virus follow you home to the dinner table.

2. Vaccinate with Reality The virus thrives on perfection. It dies in the face of reality.

  • The Protocol: Post about a failure. Not a "humble brag" failure (e.g., "I worked too hard and my team loved me for it"), but a real lesson learned from a mistake. Vulnerability is the antibody to the fake perfection of social influenza.

3. Mute the Super-Spreaders If a specific "influencer" makes you feel inadequate, annoyed, or tired, realize they are contagious.

  • The Protocol: Use the Mute button liberally. It is our best defense. You cannot heal in a toxic environment.

Part III: The Prognosis

To recover from the Social Influenza, you must remember the core sentiment of the song: You are not your feed.

In B2B, the most effective marketers are not the ones who have "gone viral" with a fever-dream of hashtags. They are the ones who remain healthy, grounded, and undeniably human.

The Final Prescription:

  • Stop "Networking," Start "Connecting": The influenza makes us view people as numbers (leads, likes, followers). Recover by viewing them as peers.

  • Check Your Pulse: Before you hit "Post," check your physical reaction. Do you cringe at the thought of posting it? If so, you are symptomatic.

  • Discharge: Close the tab. Go outside. Touch grass.

The static will always be there. You don't have to tune into it.

Listen to Social Influenza on the Marketing Mixtape

Feb 3, 2026

7 min read

man at a crossroads

How to pick the right ABM accounts

Before you begin your ABM programme your foundations (account selection) has to be right. Many ABM programmes don’t fail because the tactics are wrong, it’s more fundamental than that, if your account selection is wishful rather than calculated, you are starting on the wrong foot. 

A big logo gets picked, everyone rallies, content gets built, outreach starts then you find out the buying path is opaque, there isn’t enough repeatable work and nobody can confidently explain why this account is worth the effort right now.

ABM is not a quick fix to revenue and profit, it requires commitment and consistent time investment across research, outreach, content, relationship-building, and internal coordination. Without a consistent way to choose accounts, ABM can become a mix of activity noise and hope which is the worst thing for pipeline and speed to revenue and client-stickiness.

This article outlines a straightforward scoring method that I have used in the past to identify the accounts most likely to succeed in an ABM programme, based on recurring/upsell/cross-sell revenue potential, speed to value, and realistic expansion runway. It’s designed to be quick enough to use in the real world, even with limited resources and consistent enough to avoid internal debate.

Before you start: define your revenue goals 

Before you score anything, you need to be clear on what “success” looks like commercially to avoid scoring accounts in isolation which can lead teams to chase numbers that don’t connect to a specific outcome.

A revenue forecast is simply the result you’re trying to produce and the kind of work you need to produce it. For example, you might decide your ABM programme is meant to prioritise accounts that can reach £10k MRR within 12 months, with a credible path to £20k MRR without requiring significant additional internal investment.

ABM is a focused investment, if your programme is built to generate recurring revenue for example, your account selection needs to reflect recurring revenue realities: repeatable work, reliable buying paths, urgency, and expansion potential.

Step 1: Choose a simple but solid scoring model 

If your scoring process is complex it will confuse and if it’s too vague it can lead to gaming. You are aiming for something that can be done quickly, creates consistency, and stays connected to commercial outcomes.

A practical model is a 0 - 20 total score made up of five components:

  • Volume or Cross-sell/Upsell Potential (0 - 5)

  • Budget Access + Decision Path Strength (0 - 4)

  • Urgency / Timing (0 - 4)

  • Trigger-Offer Fit (0 - 4)

  • Expansion Runway (0 - 3)

The weighting is intentional - volume/cross-sell/upsell potential gets the most value because recurring or cross-sell/upsell revenue relies on recurring or new product/ service/jurisdiction work. The other factors determine whether you can land, deliver fast enough, and expand without friction.

Think of the total score as a quick “is this account realistically capable of hitting our ICP revenue profile?” It’s not perfect but much more effective than choosing accounts based on brand recognition and sentiment.

Step 2: Gather enough signals to score 

When teams hear “account scoring,” they often assume it means deep research and analysis paralysis. It doesn’t, you only need enough signal to make a smart first-pass decision, and then you improve the score as you learn more.

This is where the evidence score provides a simple way to track how strong your proof is.

At the first pass, you’re usually working with public signals, things you can see quickly and consistently. LinkedIn can tell you team size and structure. Job posts can hint at upcoming initiatives, pain, and maturity. Annual reports and press releases can reveal growth activity, transformation programmes, acquisitions, regulatory exposure, and operational complexity.

Then you’ve got network intel, which is often the best predictor of whether you’ll get traction. A credible internal contact, a warm intro route, prior panel status, or past work can dramatically change the probability of success sometimes more than the account’s “fit” on paper.

Finally, there’s discovery confirmation where you turn assumptions into facts, from which you can confidently make a decision. 

The key is to keep the first pass light. Score quickly based on what you know, then use the score to decide what you need to validate next.

Step 3: Score the five components (without overthinking)

Volume/Cross-sell/Upsell Potential (0 - 5)

Start with the most important question: is there likely to be enough repeatable/new work to justify recurring revenue or enough upsell/cross-sell opportunity?

A low score here usually means the work is sporadic, ad hoc, and unpredictable. Even if the company is large, that doesn’t automatically mean volume/opportunity in the area you sell. A mid-range score often suggests a few teams with steady needs, or moderate complexity spread across regions. A high score indicates environments with ongoing operational churn: regulated industries, data-heavy organisations, multi-entity structures, many vendors, procurement involvement, and the kind of compliance pressure that keeps work flowing.

If you’re aiming for something like £10k MRR or an average revenue per entity increase, this helps you sanity-check the idea of recurring or upsell/cross-sell work - can this account generate enough steady demand rather than isolated one-offs?

Budget Access + Decision Path Strength (0 - 4)

Next, look at how realistically you can get decisions made.

A low score means you don’t know who decides, procurement is unknown, and you have no route in to the people who can approve spend. A mid score suggests you have a route to stakeholders, and you can start to map the buying path even if it’s not fully clear. A high score means you can identify the decision owner/s, you understand the procurement route, and you have a credible way in through a warm intro, panel status, or existing relationship.

This factor matters because ABM without decision-path clarity can produce lots of “activity” without moving the opportunity forward.

Urgency / Timing (0 - 4)

Ask: is there a reason to act now?

ABM needs accounts that have momentum triggers and real pressure. Low urgency is steady-state- no deadlines, no pain, no reason to allocate budget as there is no clear challenge. Medium urgency suggests some triggers: maybe hiring, a new initiative, or mild dissatisfaction. High urgency usually shows up when there’s a time-bound driver such as M&A, restructuring, a transformation programme, regulatory change or commercial/competitor friction.

Trigger-Offer Fit (0 - 4)

Now ask how well your offer connects to a pain you can fix quickly.

If the fit is vague, you’ll struggle to get messaging right and fall back on generic content, and the account will stay “interested” without moving. A mid score suggests there’s a clear problem you can solve and a plausible early win. A top score means your offer maps clearly to their operational language, and you can describe outcomes in terms they actually care about.

You want to be able to create an offer that gets a foot in the door, proves value fast, and creates internal momentum.

Expansion Runway (0 - 3)

Finally, consider whether there’s room to grow beyond the initial scope.

A low score implies a narrow team or single use case. You can still win, but the growth opportunity beyond that is low. A medium score suggests multiple stakeholders, regions, or adjacent product types. A top score indicates multiple business units, repeatable or new work types and an ongoing need where expansion is a logical next step rather than a brand-new sale each time.

Step 4: Keeping your scorecard “honest”

First, assign an Evidence Level to the account. Keep it simple: Level 1 is based on public information, Level 2 includes credible network intel or relationship proof, and Level 3 is validated through discovery.

Second, assign Confidence (High/Medium/Low). High confidence means you’ve validated key assumptions in conversation and you can see a path to spend. Medium confidence means you have strong public signals and a decent route in. Low confidence means you’re mostly guessing.

These two fields stop the most common scoring hurdle, which is treating an optimistic first-pass score as if it’s truth. A high score with low confidence is not “wrong.” It’s simply a signal that you need further validation before you invest heavily.

Step 5: Can you service if you win it? (uncomfortable but important!)

ABM account selection is also about your ability to execute.

A perfect Tier 1 account becomes a poor ABM choice if you don’t have the people, time, or delivery bandwidth to follow through. After scoring, do a quick capacity review. Ask how many high-touch accounts you can genuinely service this quarter without lowering quality. Ask who owns the core motions: research, messaging, content, outreach, follow-up, sales enablement, and delivery coordination.

If naming owners is a challenge, you may not have capacity and need to be realistic in your approach. A wise colleague once told me - undersell and over deliver, don’t oversell and under-deliver, a strategy Apple follows coincidently!

Step 6: Use the score to tier accounts into ABM strength

The point of scoring is to determine how much ABM effort an account deserves - strategic (1:1), scale (1:few) or programmatic (1:many).

A practical approach is to map accounts into tiers. High-scoring accounts with stronger evidence and confidence are candidates for 1:1 ABM. Mid-range accounts often suit 1:few clusters where you can share a core play and personalise around specific triggers and roles. Lower-scoring accounts might still be relevant, but they belong in 1:many campaigns or a lighter engagement approach.

This helps by protecting you from applying Tier 1 effort to too many accounts and then wondering why everything feels hard.

Step 7: Re-score after discovery (scores are designed to evolve)

TA scorecard is not a once-and-done exercise. It’s a living number, and its job is to improve.

After your first meaningful discovery call, revisit the score. This is often where the biggest shifts happen: volume assumptions get corrected, decision paths become clearer (or more complicated), urgency becomes real (or not!), and trigger-offer fit either sharpens or turns out to be misaligned.

A simple cadence works well: first-pass score before outreach, second score after first discovery, third score after procurement and scope are clearer. No need to over-engineer, just keep it reflective of current status.

Step 8: Calibrate scoring so it stays consistent

If you have more than one person scoring accounts, you’ll see variance which is to be expected as relationships ands opinions from different view points vary which is why shared interpretation becomes important.

The easiest solution is a short calibration call to compare scores, and agree what a “4” really means in your context. From the start you should document definitions to reduce debate and increase consistency.

Step 9: Use the scorecard to make decisions

Your scorecard should sit in (or behind) your CRM with the current ABM score surfaced at the Account or ABM intelligence tab level. 

It should be used to decide which accounts enter ABM now, what tier they sit in, what needs to be validated next, and what the next action is. If an account has a strong score but weak evidence, your next action is not  to build content it should be to validate the assumptions quickly. If an account has a solid score and strong confidence, your next action is to mobilise and move via your designed outbound/inbound tactics.

For most businesses, ABM success comes from less is more - fewer accounts and clearer actions with tighter execution leading to better conversion.

For a practical way to pick the right clients for your ABM programme, download our ABM Account Scoring template 

We’ve built a practical ABM Account Scoring Scorecard template based on the five factors described and including Evidence Level and Confidence fields. It’s designed to help you prioritise accounts based on commercial reality and team capacity - so your ABM programme is focused, winnable, and repeatable. Let us know if you'd like an introduction to ABM agencies that we'd recommend.

Jan 13, 2026

10 min read

Sketch of woman looking irritated

How to choose the right CRM?

If you’ve ever inherited a CRM, in all likelihood you’ll know this uncomfortable feeling: users avoid it, reporting can’t be trusted, and the client experience suffers in ways that are difficult to pinpoint but very easy to feel. 

Choosing a CRM is a critical operating model decision affecting all functions of a business. Done well, it becomes the backbone of predictable growth and consistent client handling. Done badly, it becomes an expensive habit you keep feeding because switching feels worse than suffering.

This article is a step-by-step guide to choosing a CRM with commercial outcomes and client experience front and centre. 

Step 1: Start with how your business actually wins revenue

Before you sit through demos or compare feature lists from shortlisted vendors, draft what you’re trying to enable commercially. A CRM will amplify whatever is already true about your go-to-market. If you don’t start with a clear strategy, the system becomes a mirror of that ambiguity and the team will improvise their way around it.

Begin with your ideal client profile and your revenue process. Who are you trying to win and keep? How do deals typically start - through inbound, outbound, referrals, partners, account expansion, events, or a mix? How long do they take? Who needs to be involved? What do you need to know early in the cycle to qualify properly to avoid building a vapourware pipeline full of hope and guesswork and a contact list of ghosts?

It helps to write a simple “CRM purpose statement” (including resource reality) in plain English. For example: “We need a system that helps us respond quickly to inbound interest, run structured follow-up, manage opportunities consistently across a small team, and give leadership forecasting they can trust.” This statement is a grounding filter when a vendor starts showing you all the fancy extras, which can be very distracting in the era of AI enablement. 

Step 2: Map the client journey, not just your pipeline

A lot of CRM decisions get caught inside the sales pipeline. Pipeline matters, but it’s only one part of the client experience. The real question to ask is whether the CRM supports the full journey from first touch to expansion/renewal and advocacy, and whether it helps your commercial team present as organised and consistent throughout the buyer experience.

Think through the stages your clients’ buyer experience: anonymous interest, known lead, qualification, proposal, verbal committment, contracting, onboarding, delivery, upsell and cross-sell. For each stage, ask what a good experience looks like for the client and what has to happen behind the scenes to make that experience smooth. Where do leads and deals get stuck today? Where do handoffs break? Where do clients have to repeat themselves because internal context gets lost between teams?

When you map the journey this way, it becomes easier to see what should live inside the CRM, who owns what part and what should sit alongside it. You also stop designing around internal departmental lines and start designing around the client’s reality, which is usually where the commercial gains live.

Step 3: Decide how the CRM fits into your wider tech stack

Your CRM is never standalone, it will sit between your website, your marketing channels, your email and calendar, your proposal and contracting tools, your invoicing, your support or customer success workflows, and your reporting. The mistake many teams make is treating the CRM as a walled-garden, then being surprised when the “integrations later” plan turns into a long-running painful saga.

At this stage, draft a basic workflow view of your stack and ask what needs to be the single source of truth for accounts and contacts. Decide how leads will enter the system, where consent will be captured, how attribution will be handled, and what will be used for reporting and what data passports into finance and operations systems. It’s also worth being honest about your integration appetite. Every integration is a mini-product you now own. Someone has to maintain it, troubleshoot it, and notice when it silently breaks.

This is where you should also consider whether you want an in-suite approach or a best-of-breed approach. Suites can reduce integration complexity, but they can also push you into paying for modules you weren’t planning to buy. Best-of-breed stacks can be powerful, but they demand dedicated specialist operational ownership and discipline. Neither is inherently “right.” The right choice is the one your team can actually manage without the system degrading over time.

Step 4: Take your data seriously before you move anything

If your current data is messy, migrating it won’t magically clean it, in 99% of cases it will multiply and formalise the mess as CRMs can create the illusion of order while storing poor data in structured fields.

Before you migrate, run a practical data quality check. How many duplicates do you have? Are companies and contacts up to date, what fields have gaps and are they critical for segmentation? Are job titles reliable? Do you have consistent lead source values, or is it a creative-writing exercise? Can you tell where leads come from and whether they convert? And importantly, do you have consent captured properly, with enough detail to be confident you’re GDPR compliant?

Data cleaning and enrichment should happen before migration wherever possible. Deduplicate. Standardise key fields like industry, lifecycle stage, region, lead source. Decide what’s worth migrating and what should be archived. Migrating everything “just in case” is fatal, do the hard yards first, users and your bottom line will thank you later. You want the system to feel useful on day one and that means removing noise, not importing it.

Step 5: Design for real user behaviour (not wishful user behaviour)

Most CRM problems are user behaviour problems disguised as technology problems. If it’s hard to use, people won’t use it. If it feels like admin, they’ll avoid it. If it doesn’t help them sell or serve clients, it will become something they update when they’re told off.

Decide what you need users to do, and keep it grounded in reality. Sales teams need to be able to capture activity quickly, keep opportunities moving, and know what to do next without the CRM becoming another layer of friction. Marketing needs clean segmentation, reporting and reliable handoffs. Leadership needs always-on forecasting they can believe, and visibility into bottlenecks that doesn’t rely on someone building a fresh spreadsheet every single time, where a minor deviation in report building creates a different number for the same thing, leading to mistrust.

This is also where you choose your “non-negotiables” for adoption. If follow-up tasks aren’t created consistently today, you’ll want automation. If leads aren’t contacted quickly enough, you’ll want routing rules and alerts. If forecasting is opaque, you’ll want clear stage definitions and hygiene checks. The best CRM is the one that makes the right behaviours the easiest behaviours.

Step 6: Draft requirements as commercial outcomes vs feature lists

It’s tempting to write requirements like a shopping list: “custom objects,” “advanced reporting,” “workflows,” “AI.” A more effective approach is to express requirements in plain English terms of what the system needs to make possible.

For example, “We need to route inbound leads to the right person automatically based on territory and product line, and we need to see response time”, or “We need campaign reporting that helps us decide where to invest marketing time and money, even if it’s not perfect attribution.”

Once you have requirements phrased commercially, you can prioritise them better. Some capabilities are essential on day one, some matter later, and some can be handled by another tool in the stack. When everything is treated as equally important, nothing becomes important and you tend to overbuy and overwhelm.

Step 7: Pressure-test pricing like you’re buying a house!

This is where many CRM selections go off the rails: teams compare entry-level pricing, feel relieved, and then discover that the features they assumed were “standard” are locked behind higher tiers or separate modules.

You want to understand exactly which tier includes the capabilities that matter to your plan. Lead routing and assignment rules are a common one. Workflow automation is another. Reporting depth, forecasting tools, campaign tracking, and even basic permissions can be licence-gated depending on the vendor. Some systems also restrict things like the number of workflows, contacts, reports, API calls, or custom objects, which feels fine until you start scaling and then suddenly hits you with an ugly surprise bill.

There’s also the module trap. A vendor may position the CRM as one product, but for the setup you need, you may end up buying marketing automation, integration apps (eg into your finance application), or reporting add-ons earlier than you expected. That isn’t necessarily bad, but it should be an intentional decision with a two-year cost view, not something you discover after implementation that becomes an unforseen budget bunker-buster.

If you take one thing from this section, let it be this: build a simple two-year total cost of ownership model. Include licences, implementation, integrations, storage, enrichment tools, and the internal time and human resources required to run it. The cheapest option on month one is never the cheapest option by month eighteen.

Step 8: Look for flexibility early

Your business will change. You’ll refine your ICP, adjust your products, enter a new region, or add a partner channel and your CRM needs to move with you without becoming fragile.

Evaluate flexibility through specific scenarios. Ask how easy it is to update pipeline stages without breaking reporting, how segmentation changes are handled, what it takes to support account hierarchies if you move into enterprise. Ask how routing rules evolve as you add territories or product lines. Pay attention to whether customization is clean and governable, or whether it encourages every team to create their own fields and definitions until reporting becomes meaningless (a personal “bette noir”!).

Flexibility is useful when it supports evolution but can quickly becomes dangerous when it allows freedom of inconsistency at scale.

Step 9: Treat AI as an enablement layer that depends on your foundations

AI features in CRM platforms can be genuinely valuable. They can reduce admin through enrichment, suggest next actions, help with forecasting signals, improve data quality, and speed up content creation for emails and follow-ups. When they’re implemented well, they can genuinely benefit productivity and consistency.

AI also has dependencies, yes, pesky data hygiene, again! If your underlying data is inconsistent, AI outputs become unreliable. If activity is not logged consistently, AI insights will be incomplete. As AI often touches communication and customer data, you should check privacy and storage terms carefully, particularly if calls and emails are being analysed or summarised.

A sensible approach is to decide which AI use cases you can benefit from now, and which ones should wait until your data, user and process maturity improve. That avoids buying “AI potential” you can’t actually use yet.

Step 10: Run a proof of concept that reflects real workflows

A CRM demo is designed to impress, but a proof of concept reveals the real truth.

Test the workflows that matter most: lead capture through to qualification and handoff, opportunity progression with clear next steps and rules, and reporting that supports decisions. Use real data, even if it’s a small sample and put the system in front of the people who will use it daily and watch for where friction appears. How many clicks does it take to log an activity? How clear is the pipeline view? Can you tell what to do next without hunting? Can marketing see what happened to leads after handoff? Can leadership see pipeline health without someone interpreting it for them?

It is helpful to score it in practical terms: speed, clarity, reliability, and user willingness. If users resist during a trial, they won’t magically embrace it after you’ve signed a three-year contract. Go onto G2 and/or Capterra and read the honest “warts and all” reviews, they will give you further insight into what you can expect and potential roadblocks/mis-understandings.

Step 11: Implement a CRM like a business-critical solution, with proper ownership

Implementation should be treated as a business change programme, not a simple software setup.

Resource and ownership is critical, you need a business owner who cares about commercial outcomes and an ops owner who keeps the system clean, consistent, and continuously improving. Get your process and definitions agreed before you configure too much. Focus on a “minimum viable CRM” for the first release: core fields, one pipeline, essential dashboards, and the automations that remove friction and protect speed to revenue.

Training needs to be role-based and scenario-based. People don’t need a tour of the menu. They need to know how to do their job in the system quickly, and why it helps them. Reinforcement matters too: regular hygiene checks, clear expectations, and reporting that leaders actually use.

Step 12: Put governance in place from the start

CRMs don’t usually fail fast and loud, they degrade slowly over time. Fields proliferate, definitions drift, duplicates pile up, reporting becomes questionable, and users quietly stop trusting the system.

Clear, documented governance prevents this. For example, decide who can change pipeline stages and fields, standardise lead source values and lifecycle definitions with buy-in from the relevant stakeholders (Marketing and Sales) and establish how duplicates are handled. Assign ownership of dashboards and set a cadence for reviewing whether they still reflect how you sell and serve, archive those that are no longer used to avoid overwhelm. An oft overlooked and critical action is to set an ops rhythm of business for integration monitoring to ensure data doesn’t quietly stop syncing.

A CRM is a living, breathing ecosystem in need of solid, consistent stewardship.

Pitfalls I wish more teams spotted early

One of the most common traps is buying based on entry price and discovering later that the capabilities you assumed were included require a major tier upgrade and/or eye-watering storage fees. Another is realising that the CRM relies on other modules for basic commercial functions meaning you end-up buying a broader suite sooner than planned. Lock-ins can also emerge in subtler ways: proprietary objects, limited functionality, or complex implementations that make switching feel impossible.

There’s also the human trap of designing a CRM for reporting rather than execution. It looks great in dashboards, but it doesn’t help the team move work forward, learn and iterate for greater success and faster contract to cash cycles. When this happens, the system becomes a compliance exercise, adoption drops, data quality suffers, and leadership ends up back in spreadsheets. The irony is that the business then blames the tool, when the real issue is a mismatch between system design and user reality.

Call to action

A final word as someone who’s cleaned up too many CRM messes…

Choose the CRM that fits with your commercial strategy, user behaviours, data maturity, and wider stack. Get pricing clarity and future early, and please. . . clean your data ruthlessly before you migrate or set and stick to quality standards if starting from scratch, your entire business will thank you later. Treat AI as a productivity layer that sits on top of good foundations and implement every piece with ownership and governance so it doesn’t quietly deteriorate.

If you practice these core rules consistently your CRM becomes something people rely on rather than avoid and you can spend your time improving revenue performance instead of arguing about whose spreadsheet is correct.

For a structured way to shortlist and choose the right CRM, download our CRM Selection Scorecard 

Use it with your team during vendor demos for an evidence-based evaluation anchored to your commercial goals. 

If you’d like a second set of eyes, we can also review your requirements and vendor options and help you avoid the common (expensive) traps. Get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 6, 2026

13 min read

a customer dictionary

How to speak your customers' language in b2b marketing

In B2B marketing we are surrounded by jargon, buzzwords, and clever phrasing that makes us feel smart but often does the opposite for the people we most want to reach. So, in some ways, we are masters of our own frustration and only have ourselves to blame.

Confusion is the enemy of decision making. When your audience does not understand what you are saying, they stop listening, they stop engaging, and they choose someone simpler, clearer, and easier to work with.

Speaking the language of your customers is not about dumbing things down. It is about meeting them where they already are, using the words, explanations, and examples that make sense in their world.

Do this well and you may see an impact on sales cycles, build trust faster, and make your marketing feel like a conversation, not a lecture.

1. Listen to how your customers actually talk

Your customers are not experts in your product. They are experts in their own business. That distinction matters.

To speak their language, start by understanding how they describe:

  • Their problems

  • Their priorities

  • The outcomes they care about

  • The risks they worry about

  • The way they talk about suppliers and competitors

The fastest way to learn this is not dashboards. It is real conversations.

  • Sit in on sales calls.

  • Go to sales meetings (marketers are allowed believe it or not!).

  • Listen to discovery.

  • Read RFPs.

  • Review call transcripts.

  • Ask customers to explain things in their own words.

Write down the phrases they use. The metaphors. The shorthand. The emotional cues. This is the raw material your messaging should be built from.

2. Spend time in their world, not just your own

You do not become fluent in a language by reading a dictionary your French class. You become fluent by living in France for a while, hearing it used in context.

The same is true in B2B.

  • Attend the events your customers attend.

  • Read the publications they read.

  • Follow the people they follow.

  • Watch how they talk to each other when they are not being sold to.

  • Build your only relationships and rapport with clients too.

You will start to notice patterns. Certain words come up again and again. Certain problems are described in very specific ways. Certain phrases signal credibility and others trigger scepticism.

That is the difference between sounding like any other vendor and sounding like one of them.

3. Test whether your words really land

Once you start using your customers’ language, do not assume you have nailed it. Check.

Ask:

  • Does this phrase make sense to you?

  • Is this how you would describe the problem?

  • What would you call this in your world?


If people hesitate, rephrase, or translate your words back to you in different terms, that is a signal your language is still too internal.

4. Remove confusion to speed up decisions

Sometimes people do not engage because they are not sure what you mean, what you actually do, or how you are different. The more mental effort it takes to decode your message, the more risk it feels like to engage.

  • Strip out anything that requires explanation.

  • Replace jargon with familiar terms.

  • Swap abstract claims for concrete examples.

  • Say what you do in the words your customers already use.

Clarity is not simplistic. It is respectful. Crowbarring ‘optimizing efficiency’ is not.

5. Use the same language everywhere

Once you have earned fluency, use it consistently.

  • Website

  • Sales decks

  • Case studies

  • Emails

  • LinkedIn posts

  • Proposals

  • Onboarding

When the same words and ideas show up across every touchpoint, people feel understood. And when people feel understood, they trust faster.

6. Keep listening as language evolves

Markets shift. Priorities change. New pressures emerge. The language your customers use will evolve with them.

  • Build regular listening into your process.

  • Review calls.

  • Talk to customers.

  • Debrief with sales.

  • Sense check your messaging every quarter.

The goal is not to sound clever. It is to stay relevant.

Reality check

If your marketing sounds smarter than your customers, you are doing it wrong.

If your customers have to translate your language before they can engage, you are creating friction.

If you could substitute your product name for any other, you are wasting your time.

If your words reflect how they actually think and talk, you are making their lives easier.

That is what speaking your customers’ language really means.

Want help sense checking your messaging?

If you want help pressure testing your messaging, sense checking whether you are really speaking your customers’ language, or getting an outside view from people who have been on both sides of the table, get in touch. We can connect you with experienced B2B marketers who have lived the problems you are trying to explain and know what clarity actually looks like in the real world.

 

Jan 25, 2026

4 min read

champagne CMO CD

How to Spot a Champagne CMO in the Wild

There is a particular character many of us have met in our careers.

They arrive with a fanfare. A big title. A big salary. And a reputation that somehow always seems to survive the wreckage they leave behind.

The ink is barely dry on the contract and already they are restless.

They have not met the team.
They do not yet understand the product.
They could not explain the customer problem if you gave them a whiteboard and an hour.

But they know one thing with absolute certainty.

Everything needs to change.

  • New website.

  • New brand.

  • New message.

  • New colours.

  • New fonts.

  • New positioning.

  • New strategy.

Tear it down. Start again. Make it visible. Make it loud. Make it look like momentum.

That is what the song Champagne CMO is about. And I have met so many…!

Not bad people. Not even always untalented. But leaders who mistake vanity for progress and optics for impact. Who reach for the biggest, shiniest levers first because they are the most visible, the most award friendly, and the easiest way to signal importance.

The song pokes fun at a familiar pattern.

The rebrand before the revenue problem is understood.
The AI strategy before the go to market is fixed.
The keynote before the pipeline.
The awards table before the sales forecast.

Every year, a new buzzword. A new bandwagon. A new silver bullet.

  • Big Data.

  • The Cloud.

  • Web3.

  • Blockchain.

  • The Metaverse.

  • Artificial Intelligence.

Not as tools in service of a clear commercial problem, but as costumes to be worn. Language to be paraded. Saying the things they think their bosses and the masses want to hear.

Right now, it is Artificial Intelligence. Crowbarred into every conversation. Setting off red flags with every soundbite.

Do not get me wrong. Real AI is coming and it will continue to get better and better. But the Champagne CMOs claiming they have increased productivity by 35 percent or that every new product they launch is now AI led are not people you should be listening to, let alone hiring.

If you put a computer in front of them and said show me, they would not know where to start. But that does not stop them climbing on stages and pretending they are leading the way.

Underneath the veneer is a simple truth. Real B2B marketing is hard. And leadership is harder still.

  • It means doing your best with messy data.

  • It means listening to customers.

  • It means aligning with sales.

  • It means being accountable when the numbers do not move. Yet.

That work is slow. Unsexy. And rarely comes with a trophy or a pedestal.

So instead, some leaders reach for theatre.

  • They polish the brand while the engine misfires.

  • They talk transformation while sales squirm.

  • They chase awards while the team quietly burns out.

And when the cracks start to show, they do what they have always done.

  • Move on.

  • New role. New title. New narrative.

  • Eighteen months later, a golden goodbye and a fresh stage to perform on.

Champagne CMO is not really about one person. It is about a system that rewards confidence over competence, presentation over substance, and short term optics over long term value creation.

It is about how easy it is to look like a leader and how hard it is to actually be one.

The irony is that the best CMOs I have ever worked with look nothing like this:

  • They do not arrive with a rebrand. They arrive with a desire for context.

  • They do not lead with slogans. They lead with listening.

  • They do not chase every new trend. They make sure the boring foundations are in place.

They do not need champagne moments to feel important. They care far more about whether the business is healthier, the team is stronger, and the customer is better served than it was a year ago.

That is the quiet punchline of the song.

Real leadership does not need performance, a parade of buzzwords, or the most expensive bottle in the room.

It just needs to do the work.

How many Champagne CMOs could you name over a drink?

Listen to Champagne CMO on Marketing Mixtape

Jan 24, 2026

3 min read

an agency celebrating good blueprints

How to write a good marketing brief

I have written, received, rewritten, and quietly apologised for more marketing briefs than I care to remember.

I have also been on the other side of the table, receiving briefs so unclear they made me wonder if the sender should issue a brief to help them write a brief.

And here is the pattern. When agency work fails, it is rarely because the agency is incompetent. Sometimes it is. But it is almost always because the brief was vague, political, or simply containing too much hope that everyone would be able to build the plane whilst flying it.  

Agencies cannot fix confusion you have not fixed internally. If you cannot clearly explain the problem, nobody can solve it for you. A brief exists for one reason only and that’s to get everybody on the same page.

What a brief is actually for

A brief should not be seen as admin that can be done half assed whilst saving yourself for the face-to-face briefing where you incorrectly assume the agency are understanding every word of what you’re saying whilst furiously nodding their heads.  

The brief is the moment you force yourself to decide what problem you are actually trying to solve, why now, what success looks like commercially, and what is fixed and what is flexible. Even if you know your role inside out, its not until you have to articulate it written down that you truly connect all those synapses and truly understand the big picture and how to communicate it.

B2B marketers have known this for years. Industry bodies like the ANA and 4A’s built entire agency briefing frameworks around exactly these principles. Every serious global brand uses some version of them.

Because without clarity, everything downstream becomes guesswork. Guesswork becomes rework. Rework becomes cost. Cost becomes frustration.

Why most briefs fail in B2B

Most bad briefs are not written by bad marketers. They are written by busy people trying to move quickly. But small gaps early snowball later.

Vague problems like “we need more awareness”. Undefined success like “best in class”. Hidden budgets. Political landmines discovered too late. Multiple stakeholders giving conflicting direction. Treating the brief like something to “talk through later”. From an agency point of view, this is chaos. And chaos produces safe, average work and the odd conversation around things not being in scope. And the output ultimately suffers. 

Stop treating the brief like admin

If the brief is rushed, the thinking is rushed. If the thinking is rushed, the work is rushed.

The brief is the one truth everyone aligns around. It is not a placeholder for a future conversation. Writing it properly is some of the highest ROI time you will ever spend as a marketer.

Start with the business problem, not the deliverable

Too many briefs start like this. “We need a campaign.” “We need a website refresh.” “We need a brand video.” That is already the wrong starting point. Those are solutions.

A brief should start with the problem. For example, “Our win rate in enterprise RFPs has dropped from 22 percent to 14 percent. We think this is because prospects do not understand how we differ from competitors.” Now an agency can think. Not just execute. Specific beats abstract every time.

Use a structure that forces clarity

There are lots of formal templates out there. Most of them say the same thing in different language. Here is the simple structure I use and I feel it consistently works.

  1. Context. Who you are. What is happening commercially. Why this matters now. This is my number one recommendation. Give agencies the honest truth in as much detail as possible. The brief isn’t a sterile marketing brochure. You do not need to sugar coat everything. You get the best out of your doctors by telling them absolutely everything and letting them decide how to proceed. Same principle applies here.

  2. The real problem. What is actually broken or underperforming. With evidence.

  3. Objectives. Business outcomes first. Then marketing outcomes. Be explicit about your KPIs and Objectives and Key Results (OKR). KPIs are operational signals like MQLs from target accounts, conversion rates, or pipeline created. OKRs are strategic outcomes like increasing enterprise pipeline or improving win rate. If you confuse the two, agencies optimise the wrong thing.

  4. Audience. Not “decision makers”. Be precise. Titles, pressures, risks, and how they buy. If you have good personas, share them. If you don’t, it’s really worth putting the effort in before you brief an agency.

  5. Insight. Why would anyone care. What tension or frustration are you solving.

  6. Scope and deliverables. What you think you need the agency to deliver.

  7. Constraints and non-negotiables. Budget ranges (please do this, it wastes time pretending it's a secret), timelines, legal rules, brand requirements, internal politics, technical limitations. Put reality on the table early. Constraints do not limit creativity. They focus it.

  8. Success criteria. How you will judge the work. In plain English. If you cannot describe success clearly, you will never recognise it and it would be unfair to beat the agency with a stick later.

  9. Decision rights and governance. Define who signs off strategy, who approves budgets, who can veto work, how feedback will be consolidated, and what gets escalated. If ten stakeholders can rewrite creative later, the agency needs to know now.

  10. Cadence. Set check ins up front. Weekly, fortnightly, or milestone based. Aligned feedback loops massively reduce rework because assumptions are challenged early.

Separate leading and lagging expectations

Another common failure is expecting instant results, especially in B2B. Some results lead and some lag. Leading signals include engagement, meetings, and early pipeline. Lagging signals include revenue and closed deals. If you brief agencies only on lagging results, you could panic too early and kill good work before it compounds.

Define a single source of truth

One owner. One document. One version. Not email threads. Not conflicting decks. A brief should be the single source of truth everyone refers back to. If stakeholders contradict the brief mid project, you reset alignment. Otherwise, chaos creeps in.

What good versus bad looks like

“Enterprise win rate has fallen 14% in the last 6 months due to perceived weak differentiation in RFPs versus our top competitor.” Versus “Need more awareness.”

“We are only interested in influencing CIOs and procurement leads our Top 20 target Hedge Fund firms.” Versus “Decision makers in financial services.”

Success. “Increase win rate 20 percent in six months for our core service.” Versus “Be market leading.”

Constraints. “Budget is capped at $30,000 for this year and procurement benchmarking is required”. Versus not mentioned.

The difference, again, is clarity. You do not win by hiding anything.

Walk the agency through it live

Never just email the brief. Talk it through. Encourage questions. If an agency does not challenge parts of your brief, worry. The best ones always push back. The great ones walk away if they are not being heard.

Ship the brief early

Do not wait three weeks polishing language. Get a solid version out. Use it. Refine it. Real conversations improve briefs faster than internal wordsmithing ever will. Engage agencies before you have finished the brief, they will add value even if you end up not selecting them.

The simple rule to remember

A good brief makes it obvious what is being bought, why it exists, who it is for, what success looks like, and how decisions will be made. If any of those are fuzzy, the brief is not ready. The clearer you are upfront, the less you pay later in rework, delays, and disappointment.

Call to action

Before your next agency project, stop and write the brief properly. Define the real problem. Be honest about constraints. Agree success criteria. Clarify who decides what. Then sit with sales and ask one question. If we nailed this, what would actually change commercially? Put that answer in the brief.

If you want help building briefs that agencies actually respect and that consistently produce better work, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Feb 2, 2026

7 min read

emojis relating to case studies

How to write a case study that actually helps you win deals

I have lost count of how many B2B case studies I have read that sound like this.

“Leading global provider…”
“Best in class solution…”
“Seamless transformation…”
“Delighted customer…”

Followed by marketing spiel that definitely came from the marketing team and not the client themselves. By paragraph two you already know whether the whole case study is nonsense or not.

If nobody talks like that in real life, nobody believes it.

Yet marketing teams keep producing them. Beautiful PDFs. Fancy layouts. Sanitized quotes. Then we wonder why no positive feedback is ever received about them. But hey, some firms have no case studies at all so at least something is better than nothing?

Most case studies feel like they are written to impress internally. The best case studies are written to help a prospect make a decision.

What a case study is actually for

A case study is not content. It is not brand storytelling. It is not a trophy cabinet.

For the selling entity, it is a risk reduction tool.

In complex B2B buying, prospective clients are not asking, are these guys impressive?

They are asking:

  • Has someone like me done this before?

  • Did it work in the real world?

  • What broke?

  • How painful was it?

  • Would I look stupid choosing these people?

  • If things went wrong, would these guys help fix it?

This is what Gartner calls sense making. Buying groups use evidence to build confidence and justify decisions internally.

Your case study exists to help them decide to purchase from you.

In plain English, it is social proof and risk reduction. In more technical terms, it is sales enablement. It gives buying groups evidence they can circulate internally to justify a decision. If it cannot survive being forwarded to a CFO or procurement lead, it is not doing its job.

Why most case studies fail

The B2B case studies I have seen fail all follow similar paths:

  • They sound like press releases

  • They hide the messy bits

  • They over claim

  • They use vendor language, not prospect language

  • They report vanity metrics

  • They focus on features, not decisions

They read like marketing. And marketing is exactly what buyers are suspicious of.

So they get ignored. And sales get no help from them.

Reality check

If sales never sends your case studies to prospects, that is not a distribution problem. It is a credibility problem.

Structure it like a story, not a brochure

Authoritative guides all say the same thing in different ways. Case studies that convert follow a clear narrative arc.

Call it what you like. Situation, complication, resolution, results. Or simply problem, decision, outcome. Either way, it mirrors how real buying happens.

A simple structure that consistently works:

  1. Context
    Who they are and why this mattered commercially

  2. The real problem
    What was broken and what it was costing them

  3. The options considered
    Competitors, internal builds, doing nothing

  4. The risks and objections
    What nearly stopped the decision

  5. The approach
    What you did and why those choices mattered

  6. The outcomes
    Hard, commercial results

  7. Lessons learned
    What they would do differently next time

That last one is gold. Almost nobody includes it. It is also the most believable part.

Start with the prospect’s problem, not your solution

The biggest mistake I see is jumping straight to “what we delivered.”

Prospects do not care what you delivered until they recognize themselves in the problem.

So describe the reality.

Not “digital transformation initiative.” More like “these three systems didn’t talk to each other and a team stuck in spreadsheets at midnight.”

Specific beats abstract every time.

Include the messy bits

Perfection kills credibility. If everything sounds seamless, buyers assume it is edited fiction.

Show:

  • Delays

  • Trade offs

  • Internal disagreements

  • Things that did not work first time

  • What you fixed

Small imperfections increase trust. “Here is what went wrong and how we handled it” is far more convincing than “everything was flawless.”

Use real quotes, not marketing quotes

The fastest way to ruin a case study is a ghostwritten quote.

Interview the client properly.

Ask:

  • What kept you up at night before this?

  • What nearly stopped you choosing us?

  • What surprised you during the project?

  • What would you warn others about?

Capture how they actually talk. Keep the rough edges.

Write for sales, not for awards

Sit next to a salesperson and ask, “When would you actually use this?”

If they hesitate, it is not useful.

Strong case studies give sales:

  • Language they can borrow

  • Proof they can forward

  • Numbers they can quote

  • Stories they can tell in meetings

Case studies should feel like ammunition, not collateral.

Visuals like evidence, not decoration

Use:

  • Before and after charts

  • Simple metric tables

  • Pull quotes

  • Snapshots of results

  • Client logos with permission

Focus on metrics that matter:

  • Revenue impact

  • Cost savings

  • Time saved

  • Risk reduced

  • Operational efficiency

If a CFO would not care, neither will your prospect.

Make them easy to share

Nobody wants a 25 page PDF.

Create:

  • A short version

  • A one page summary

  • Slides sales can paste into decks

  • A web page version

  • A PDF

Friction kills usage.

Ship early and iterate

Do not wait six months for the perfect version.

Start simple. Use it in live deals. Get feedback. Improve it.

Case studies get better through iteration, not perfection.

Make it a repeatable process, not a one off project

The teams that do this well treat case studies like a system, not an occasional marketing exercise.

For example:

  • Agree one clear owner

  • Ask sales to nominate one client per quarter

  • Run structured interviews within 30 days of a win

  • Ship a simple V1 in weeks, not months

  • Track usage in CRM or sales feedback

  • Retire anything sales never uses

If you cannot produce two or three solid case studies a quarter, you probably have a process problem, not a customer problem.

Lessons learnt over the years

It is easy to decide you need more case studies. It is much harder to actually source them.

Trying to get case studies made and signed off is almost a rite of passage for every B2B marketer.

Some ways I have succeeded:

Ask sales
Ask sales and client delivery teams for nominations. They have the relationships. Help them position it as low effort and high value for the client.

Incentivize if needed
Run an internal program. Offer a meaningful prize for successful nominations. It works.

Client contracts
Try to weave case study rights into contracts upfront. They will negotiate, but at least you start from yes.

Align with client satisfaction programs
When clients rate you highly or say they would recommend you, ask right then for a testimonial or case study.

Testimonials
If a full case study is not possible, get a short testimonial. Something is better than nothing.

Make sign off simple
Case studies often die at legal. Keep approval forms simple. This is not the Declaration of Independence.

Named clients are better than anonymous
But anonymous is still useful. Give sales options.

Client logos
If it is reasonable, just use them. If they ask you to remove it, apologize and move on.

Writing them before you even mention the subject to the client
Sometimes, you have to grab the bull by the horns and write the case study for the client, then shove it in front of them to say "how do you feel about this case study?". It's amazing what that can do to spur action as editing someone else's work is so much easier than starting from a blank page.

Reality check

A case study that sounds like a brochure may impress internally.
A case study that sounds like real life builds trust with prospective clients.
One gets likes. The other wins deals.

If your case studies make marketing proud but clients ignore them, they are not assets. They are decoration.

The simple rule to remember

A case study is not about proving you are great. It is about helping a prospective client feel safe choosing you.

If it helps them justify the decision internally, it works.

Call to action

Pick your last five case studies and ask sales one question.

Have you used this in a live deal in the last 90 days and did it make a difference?

If the answer is no, rewrite them.

Start with the real problem. Show the risks. Include the messy bits. Use numbers that matter. Let the customer sound human.

If you want help turning your case studies into assets that sales teams actually use, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Feb 1, 2026

7 min read

lady with cup against wall trying to listen

How to influence the buying group when you are not in the room

I’ve long believed that if we could run a proper win loss analysis on every enterprise deal ever done, we’d find that most decisions are not for the ‘best’ solution, but for the one that carries the least personal and professional risk.

Some organisations still behave as if influence only happens in meetings, presentations, and pitches. But anyone who has sat on the buying side of a large decision knows the real work, debate and decisions happen elsewhere.

In corridor conversations. In internal Slack threads. In late-night email chains. In the quiet moment when someone asks themselves, “If this goes wrong, what will it mean for me?”

Gartner’s Buying Group and Sense Making research shows that complex purchases are made by groups, not individuals, and that progress is blocked less by lack of information and more by lack of confidence and internal alignment. Buyers are rarely asking, “Do we know enough?” They are asking, “Are we sure enough to put our names to this?”

When you are not in the room, influence does not disappear. You just have to hope you have done enough of the right things that it permeates.

How buying groups actually make sense of decisions

Gartner call this ‘sense making’ – the process by which a group interprets information, aligns perspectives, and becomes confident enough to commit. It isn’t about learning features.

In practice, buying groups use external signals to answer questions like:

  • Is this company credible?

  • Do they really understand our world?

  • Have others like us trusted them?

  • Will I look foolish if this goes wrong?

  • Is this the safest decision I can defend internally?

  • Do I want to give these guys business?

  • Do I want to work with them for the foreseeable future?

From the buying side, I once watched a nine-figure technology deal stall for months, not because of any functional gap, but because a CFO quietly told our CIO, “I’m just not convinced these people are a safe pair of hands.” The vendor never heard that sentence. But it decided the outcome.

Conversely, as part of an ABM programme I once ran, we put a prospect in a room with an existing client and then deliberately left. We let them talk for hours without us present. No sales pitch. No marketing slides. No intervention.

When we won the deal, the feedback was simple. They trusted us because we trusted the conversation, and because the client spoke honestly about where we were strong and where we were not, and how we showed up when things went wrong.

That is influence when you are not in the room.

Persuasion versus reassurance

Most marketing is built to persuade. Late-stage B2B buying is about reassurance. It is about helping people defend a decision they already lean towards, not forcing them into a new one.

In those situations, what they do not need is another feature list. They simply want enough confidence to take the final step without fearing personal fallout.

This is why content that genuinely helps get deals over the line does not shout. It steadies.

Mental availability and narrative consistency

Research from the B2B Institute and Ehrenberg Bass introduces the concept of mental availability, which in simple terms means how easily your brand comes to mind in a buying situation and what it is associated with when it does. When I studied B2B marketing over 25 years ago (gulp), we simply called this ‘recall’.

Mental availability is built through consistent association with specific problems, outcomes, and points of view. When stakeholders discuss an issue, your name should feel like a natural, credible reference point.

That only happens when your story is coherent across:

  • Your content

  • Your leadership voice

  • Your subject matter experts

  • Your customers

  • Your partners and analysts

Reality check

If your website, your executives’ LinkedIn feeds, your case studies, and your sales decks all tell slightly different versions of who you are, and in different ways, you are not building influence. It is a wasted opportunity for marginal gains.

Map influence to buying group roles

Gartner’s Buying Group model shows that different stakeholders carry different risks.

The economic buyer worries about strategic impact, financial exposure, and reputation with peers and board.
The technical and functional evaluators worry about feasibility, integration, and whether your team truly understands their reality.
The risk and governance influencers worry about compliance, security, contractual exposure, and personal accountability.

Influence outside the room comes from making sure each of these roles can find reassurance in your external presence.

Proxies for presence

When you are not in the room, others speak for you:

  • Content that explains trade-offs in plain language

  • Leaders who show clarity and stability of thought

  • Experts who share practical lessons from the field

  • Customers who talk honestly about what went wrong and how it was fixed

  • Analysts and partners who validate your position

These act as proxies for your credibility and reduce the psychological cost of choosing you.

The psychology underneath

Several behavioural forces shape this:

  • Authority bias means people trust credible voices.

  • Social proof means they look for evidence others have chosen safely.

  • Loss aversion means the fear of a wrong decision outweighs the upside of a bold one.

  • Status quo bias means familiar often feels safer than better.

Your job as a marketer is to ensure the signals prospective clients encounter counterbalance these forces, not reinforce their anxiety.

How marketing can deliberately shape influence

Practical steps that work:

  • Map priority accounts and their buying group roles

  • Identify the unspoken fears at each stage

  • Build content that answers those fears directly

  • Align visible leaders and experts to those concerns

  • Ensure customers and partners tell consistent stories

  • Train sales on which assets reduce which objections

This is hard work and will require support from the comms team, but it will be hugely valuable to your sales teams and they will really notice it.

How to tell if you are influencing without being present

I doubt we will ever see the holy grail of perfect attribution. But we should be able to see signals:

  • Prospects referencing your content before you send it

  • Stakeholders already using your language internally

  • Fewer late-stage surprises

  • Shorter internal approval cycles

  • Sales reporting higher confidence and fewer defensive conversations

It can be hard for marketing to get explicit credit once this way of working becomes embedded, as sales will simply come to expect it. But the process of putting it in place will make you a stronger, more commercial marketer, and the insight you gain from those conversations will serve you for the rest of your career.

The simple rule to remember

In complex B2B buying, deals are rarely won by the loudest voice in the room. They are won by the most trusted voice in the minds of the group when you are not there.

If your narrative, your people, and your proof help prospective clients feel safe, aligned, and confident, you are influencing the buying group long before the final meeting and materially increasing your chances of winning.

Call to action

For your three most important live deals, ask sales one simple question:

What is the one unspoken fear in the room?

Then audit your content, leadership visibility, and proof points and ask honestly what directly reduces that fear.

  • Map your buying groups.

  • Understand their personal and professional risks.

  • Decide what you want to be trusted for.

  • Ensure your story is consistent wherever they look.

If you want help turning your marketing into a system that builds confidence and consensus when you are not in the room, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 23, 2026

6 min read

man revealing content for sale under his jacket

How to use content to support live B2B sales deals

It sometimes feels that some B2B organisations still think of content as something that happens before sales get involved. Awareness, consideration, nurture, etc. Then the baton is passed to sales and content becomes background noise.

That is not how buying actually works in reality.

Gartner’s Buying Group research has shown repeatedly that complex B2B purchases are made by groups of six to ten people, each with different concerns, risks, and success criteria. Progress doesn’t really stall because the buyers lack information but because they lack confidence and internal alignment.

Content is one of the main tools buying groups can use to try and nudge that alignment along. Between meetings, in internal threads, and in private preparation.

How buying groups actually use content in live deals

Once a deal is active, content is used to:

  • Sense check what sales has said

  • Prepare for internal conversations

  • Build a shared understanding of the problem

  • Reduce personal and professional risk

  • Validate that a choice is safe and defensible

This is what Gartner calls ‘sense making’. It is the process by which groups interpret information, align their views, and become confident enough to commit.

Content that does not help with sense making rarely helps close deals and probably just irritate the buyer.

Map content to real buying group roles

Gartner’s Buying Group model identifies several roles that appear consistently in complex purchases. For practical purposes, they can be grouped into three clusters.

The economic buyer
The senior executive accountable for business impact. They care about strategic fit, financial outcomes, and whether the decision looks sensible to their peers and board. For them, content must articulate commercial logic, market context, and long-term direction. If you can get them to read it.

The technical and functional evaluators
The people who will live with the solution. CIOs, Heads of Ops, Architects, Practitioners. They care about feasibility, integration, trade-offs, and whether your organisation truly understands their reality. They value depth, realism, and evidence from the field.

The risk and governance influencers
Procurement, Legal, Security, Compliance, Finance. They care about exposure, process, and personal accountability. Their job is to stop bad decisions, not to enable bold ones. They look for reassurance, standards, proof, and precedent.

Reality check
If your content only speaks to the economic story and ignores technical or risk concerns, consensus could collapse later in the deal.

Align content to deal stages, not funnel stages

In live opportunities, content plays different roles at different moments.

Early stage
Reframing and problem definition.
Content that helps the group agree what the real issue is and why change matters.

Mid stage
Evaluation and comparison.
Content that explains approaches, options, trade-offs, and implementation realities.

Late stage
Validation and risk reduction.
Content that proves safety, credibility, and that others have succeeded without disaster. Are you the safe pair of hands? Are you going to pick up the phone at 10pm on a Saturday if the shit hits the fan?

Most B2B content strategies are heavily weighted to early stage and dangerously thin where deals are actually won or lost. Marketers often struggle to go deep into the sales cycle but you could argue that’s where sales need us most.

What content sales actually use

Content that supports deals typically has these characteristics:

  • It addresses real objections raised in meetings

  • It is written in the language prospects use, not internal product language

  • It contains practical detail, not just positioning

  • It shows what good and bad look like, not just success stories

  • It is easy to share internally and easy to quote

This is not brand storytelling, the high-level guff that adds value to no one. It is commercial reassurance.

A simple example in practice

Imagine a complex technology services deal in financial services.

  • The CIO is concerned about transformation risk and a key part of their plan falling over.

  • The Head of Ops worries about disruption and knock on effects of not doing things fast enough or doing things badly.

  • Procurement focuses on contractual exposure.

  • Security wants proof of maturity.

A content set that genuinely supports the deal might include:

  • An executive brief on how similar firms managed change without destabilising operations

  • A practical integration guide written by delivery leaders, in their language

  • A case study that openly discusses what went wrong and how it was fixed

  • A security and compliance overview mapped to regulatory language

Each piece speaks to a different fear. Together they help the group say yes.

How to organise content so sales can actually use it

The strongest organisations:

  • Map content to buying group roles

  • Tag assets by objection and decision stage

  • Train sales on when to use what, and why

  • Review which assets appear in progressing deals

  • Retire or rewrite content that never features in real conversations

This turns content from a library into a decision support system.

How to measure contribution without pretending attribution

You will not get clean last click revenue attribution. That is not how complex buying works.

Instead, we need to look for:

  • Content presence in progressing opportunities

  • Stakeholder engagement across buying groups

  • Reduced repetition of the same objections

  • Shorter time between deal stages

  • Sales feedback on prospect confidence and preparedness (key internally!)

This is what influenced pipeline and opportunity velocity look like in practice.

Reality check
If your best content never appears in live sales conversations, it is not doing the job you think it is.

The simple rule to remember

In our B2B world, content does not exist to generate traffic.It exists to reduce risk, build confidence, and help groups of people make hard decisions together.

If it does not support sense making and consensus, it is noise. And the one thing our buyers and marketing in general, need is yet more noise.

Call to action

If you want content to help win deals, stop planning around formats and start planning around decisions.

  • Map your buying groups.

  • Map their fears, questions, and internal politics.

  • Map where confidence breaks down.

  • Then build content that helps them make sense of what they are about to commit to.

If you want help turning your content into a system that supports real commercial decisions rather than a publishing machine, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 23, 2026

5 min read

linkedin logo spray painted on black wall

How to use LinkedIn to support live sales deals

Most B2B organisations still treat LinkedIn as a parallel marketing activity. Content is published. Executives post occasionally (quite often via junior members of the comms team). Sales connect and sometimes message. None of it is deliberately tied to what is happening inside live deals.

That is a mistake.

Gartner and CEB research have shown for years that complex B2B purchases are made by buying groups, not individuals, and that confidence, consensus, and risk reduction are as important as product capability. Today, a significant part of that sense making happens on LinkedIn.

When a deal is live, buying group members use LinkedIn to:

  • Validate who you are

  • Assess whether your people understand their world

  • Look for stability and leadership

  • Seek peer and analyst signals

  • Quietly reduce perceived risk

Now, they may not be consciously doing this. But they are doing this. LinkedIn is already influencing deals and most teams just are not managing it.

Map LinkedIn to real buying group roles

To make this practical, think about the three roles that almost always shape enterprise decisions.

The economic buyer
Usually a C suite or senior commercial leader. They care about business impact, risk, stability, and whether your leadership looks credible and in control. For them, LinkedIn presence should demonstrate strategic clarity, market understanding, and organisational maturity.

The technical or functional evaluator
Often a CIO, CTO, Head of Ops, or senior practitioner. They look for depth, realism, and whether your people genuinely understand the problem space. Here, subject matter experts sharing practical insight, trade-offs, and lessons learned matter far more than polished marketing messages.

The risk and compliance influencer
Legal, security, procurement, or governance roles. They are looking for trust signals, proof, and reassurance that choosing you will not expose them. Analyst commentary, customer stories, and evidence of process maturity play a big role.

Reality check
If your LinkedIn presence only speaks to one of these groups, you are leaving the others to form their own, often conservative, conclusions.

Create a simple deal support loop

To move from theory to practice, I often recommend teams treat LinkedIn as part of their deal operating rhythm.

A simple model that works in B2B organisations looks like this:

  • Identify priority live accounts in CRM

  • Map the buying group and key roles

  • Agree which internal voices should be visible to each role

  • Define the themes that reduce risk at this stage of the deal

  • Coordinate light, authentic visibility and engagement

  • Review which stakeholders viewed, followed, or engaged

This is not about orchestrated commenting or spammy activity. It is about making sure the right people, with the right credibility, are visible to the right stakeholders at the right time. And in the largest, transformational deals, you should be looking for any marginal gain you can get. From a career perspective, hearing a marketer talk about this stuff could really help the internal perception of them, we’re thinking about marketing from a commercially lense here.

A simple example of LinkedIn supporting one live deal

Imagine a £500k enterprise software deal with a financial services firm. The buying group includes a CIO, a Head of Operations, a Procurement lead, and a Risk Director.

Before first contact
Marketing and sales agree this is a priority account. The CIO and Head of Ops are already connected to your CTO and one of your lead consultants. Over the previous month, both have seen thoughtful posts about regulatory change and operational resilience. When the first outreach email arrives, your company name is not unfamiliar. Response rates are higher because recognition and credibility are already forming.

During evaluation
The technical team is assessing your platform against two competitors. Your subject matter experts are sharing practical perspectives on integration challenges and lessons learned from similar clients. The Head of Ops clicks through to a case study and notices several of your consultants commenting with real implementation insight and its clearly written by them and not the comms team. This quietly reinforces that you have depth, not just marketing polish.

Late stage and risk sign off
Procurement and Risk are now involved. They look at your leadership team on LinkedIn. They see consistent messaging about security, governance, and long-term partnership. They also see analysts and partners engaging with your content. Nothing raises red flags. No grand claims, no hype. Just steady, credible signals. The internal question shifts from “Are they safe” to “Which of the three is the safest?”.

LinkedIn will not close a deal; I’d never go that far. But it can help reduce uncertainty, reinforce confidence, and make every sales conversation a little easier and are useful reasons to follow up for salespeople who want to reinforce a point made in a meeting.

Warm accounts before outreach

Before the first call, familiarity matters. LinkedIn’s own B2B Institute and ABM research from firms like ITSMA (which I have a long history with – I met my wife at one of their conferences!) consistently show that recognition and perceived expertise increase response rates.

This means:

  • Ensuring target stakeholders are connected to relevant leaders and experts

  • Making sure your company and people appear in their feed in a useful, non-promotional way

  • Establishing presence before the first sales interaction

The goal should be to ensure that by the time outreach happens, you are no longer a cold name.

Support evaluation and objection handling

Late-stage objections are rarely about features. They are about giving the buyers confidence that they are ready to finalize their decision.

  • Is this company stable?

  • Do they really understand our industry?

  • Are we taking a personal or professional risk by choosing them?

  • Will they be a safe long term partner?

LinkedIn content and presence can quietly address these by:

  • Showing how your leaders think about industry change. I mean truly them not sanitised BS that takes the soul and personality from their views.

  • Demonstrating how your experts handle complexity

  • Sharing how clients have navigated challenges with you. REAL anecdotes and stories.

  • Providing analyst and partner validation

This is narrative reassurance, not sales scripting.

A hard truth
We all know that people by from people. Most B2B deals are lost on confidence, not capability. LinkedIn is now one of the main places that confidence is formed for relatively new professional people in your life, yet it is still treated as a side project. It may not make you like someone but it sure can put you off dealing with them.

What not to do

To use LinkedIn effectively in live deals, it helps to be clear about what actively undermines credibility.

Avoid

  • Generic thought leadership that says nothing specific

  • Engagement bait and motivational poster content

  • Over polished, obviously ghostwritten executive posts

  • Automated connection and messaging sequences

  • Product pushing in public threads

Senior buyers can smell inauthenticity and manipulation instantly. It erodes trust rather than builds it. I like to call it Social Influenza.

How sales should use LinkedIn day to day

At an individual level, effective sales use of LinkedIn includes:

  • Researching stakeholder backgrounds and priorities

  • Following what matters to them

  • Sharing relevant insight before and after meetings

  • Reinforcing key points with credible third party content

  • Staying visible without being intrusive

The best salespeople already do this. The best organisations support it with training, content, and alignment.

How to evidence impact

You will never be able to claim direct attribution in the same way as paid media. But you can show contribution.

Useful indicators include:

  • Growth of relationships within target accounts

  • Profile views and follows from buying group members

  • Engagement with deal relevant content

  • Improved reply rates and meeting acceptance

  • Sales feedback on confidence and preparedness of prospects. And that’s a key one. If they verbally support what marketing

  • is doing to support their active deals and have been actively involved, there’s half the battle won.

The simple rule to remember

The biggest and best deals are competitive and strategic use of LinkedIn can give your team a very slim edge. At the very least, it can really help insert strategic communication thoughts into the sales team and, if at the very least, they have more relevant and tailored material to call upon and have the talking points front of mind.

Sometimes it’s the little things that could tip deals into your favour.

Call to action

If you want LinkedIn to support live sales deals, stop treating it as a social channel and start treating it as part of your commercial system.

  • Map buying group roles.

  • Align visible voices to those roles.

  • Agree the stories and proof that reduce risk at each stage.

  • Support sales to use LinkedIn deliberately, not opportunistically.

If you want help turning LinkedIn into a genuine deal support capability rather than a vanity platform, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 22, 2026

7 min read

businessmen making a predator handshake

How to collaborate better with commercial operations

"Hey, we're about to have a strategy meeting - can I invite you/your team?" These words are heard way too infrequently by Commercial Ops and it costs businesses money. All too often, until a nurturing sequence, form or automation breaks, nobody cared how the leads arrived in their inbox, who maintained how they got to them, or what “data hygiene” even means.

Marketing Operations (MOps) and Sales Operations (SOps, together; Commercial Ops) often live in an invisible zone.

When working well, it’s quiet, prospects are nurtured and leads route correctly. Emails and segmentation behaves, forms funnel leads for actions smoothly and the data is usable. Sales sees what it needs at the right time and your prospects experience a coherent journey from “I’m curious” to “Let’s talk” without a spray-and-pray email avalanche, confusion, or being ghosted.

When it’s not working, teams panic and the finger-pointing begins. Why are leads going to the wrong rep? Why did the nurture email hit customers and prospects with the same message, etc? 

Ops can feel “difficult” – bear with them

Most commercial strategies look elegant on slides but real life is more complicated. People have limited time, definitions are not clarified or drift and systems don’t behave as expected. That doesn’t even include clients - who do unexpected things (like clicking “request a demo” three times, or buying after reading a blog post without ever filling out a form!) 

Commercial Ops is hardwired to surface the questions that knit “great idea” into “operational reality.” These questions can feel inconvenient because they question ideas early by demanding clarity and trade-offs. They expose where leadership hasn’t agreed on what “good” looks like. That can be uncomfortable but it’s also exactly how you avoid wasting months and money building the wrong thing.

A strong Commercial Ops function tends to ask questions like: What outcome are we actually driving here - pipeline this quarter, revenue later, retention, expansion or partner-sourced deals? Who exactly is this for, and what are we choosing to ignore so we keep focus? What is the customer experience end-to-end, including the bits after the form submit when people are waiting? What counts as an MQL and SQL in our business, not someone else’s framework? How will we measure impact, and what data needs to exist for that measurement to be trustworthy? Who owns each step, and what happens when they don’t do it?

These aren’t “admin” questions, they are commercial questions that sharpen and ground your plan in reality for repeatable execution. 

What do Commercial Ops do?  

These professionals often get reduced to “the person who makes HubSpot work” or “the team that runs the tools.” Tools matter, yet that framing misses the bigger value which is Marketing Ops is the discipline of designing and running the systems behind growth: the data, workflows, automation, measurement, and operational experience that customers and revenue teams move through every day.

When MOps is included early, the following happens that commercial leaders care about:

First, decisions get better. Commercial decisions rely on signal: segment performance, funnel conversion, acquisition cost, channel mix, pipeline velocity, response rates, intent signals, and the story the data is telling. When the signal is confusing, the business makes expensive guesses and then argues about what happened later. Commercial Ops improves decision quality by engineering reliable capture, consistent definitions, and a sensible measurement system that leadership can trust.

Second, execution gets faster, sustainably. Speed is about being able to act repeatedly, learning, and scaling without rebuilding every single time by creating reusable assets like campaign templates, routing logic and automation flows so the business can move quickly without creating fragile systems that collapse when one person goes on holiday.

Third, customer experience improves. The buying journey has an operational interface, including how many form fields you demand, whether the thank-you page is helpful, how quickly someone follows up, if sales is informed or unaware, and whether the emails they receive make sense based on what they did. Commercial Ops shapes that operational UX directly affecting buyer experience  in particular trust, conversion, and momentum.

The hidden cost of excluding Commercial Ops from commercial decisions

When Commercial Ops is invited late, predictable failures occur. Some examples include: backlogs because nobody mapped capacity, sequencing, or implementation; sales and marketing disagree on reality because dashboards tell different stories and definitions aren’t consistent, or Leads get mishandled, either routed incorrectly or followed up too slowly.

Customer experience suffers in invisible ways that aren’t clear immediately, or in a single measurable way, such like duplicate emails, irrelevant nurture, inconsistent messaging or sales conversations that start from zero context, all of which require operational clean-up.

I can’t emphasise this more - that clean-up cost is usually higher than the cost of doing it properly upfront and breaks trust internally. Teams lose confidence in systems (and sometimes, more dangerously, each other), then build workarounds, then your process becomes a patchwork of spreadsheets and Teams messages. 

An inclusive operating approach 

Including Commercial Ops in commercial decisions doesn’t have to turn everything into decision-by-committee. It means thinking of ops in the moments where decisions become operational reality, and giving them clear ownership over how the system is built.

A practical starting point is to change your mindset about Commercial Ops from downstream execution to co-designer of growth and the easiest way to do that is to decide which decisions require an ops voice. Any decision that changes what you measure, how customers move through the journey, or who owns which step should involve Commercial Ops early. Think go-to-market changes, pricing and packaging changes, lifecycle definitions, lead qualification rules, campaigns, CRM or MarTech changes, integrations, and anything that touches customer data, consent, or handoffs.

The Strategy-to-Execution Brief: one page that changes everything

If you adopt one habit, make it this: every meaningful initiative gets a short “Strategy-to-Execution Brief” that Commercial Ops helps shape. Keep it to one page. The goal is to translate intent into an executable system before you commit timelines and targets.

In paragraph form, the brief answers: What are we trying to achieve commercially, and in what timeframe? Who is the target audience, what is the offer, and what is the call-to-action? Where in the funnel are we expecting movement, and how will we know the initiative worked? What operational requirements exist - changes to the CRM, automation, routing, tracking, data capture? Who owns each step, what is the expected follow-up time, and what happens if that follow-up doesn’t happen? What risks exist - tracking gaps, deliverability issues, consent problems, data quality - and how will we mitigate them?

This is about creating a clarity mechanism that Commercial Ops co-authors with marketing and sales leadership.

Definitions are a fundamentally necessary foundation 

Every organisation claims it wants alignment, which consequently requires shared language. Without it, you can’t tell whether you’re winning, and you can’t compare performance across teams, segments, and time periods. Definitions may sound boring until they save you. I have unfortunately experienced working in many businesses where this clarity was never defined or documented resulting in consistent misalignment and mistrust between teams and results.

At minimum, commercial leadership should align on what counts as a lead, what “marketing engaged” means, how qualification works, what an SQL is, deal stages and how customers move through lifecycle stages, and what disqualification reasons look like. These definitions should be documented and embedded in the systems, CRM properties, validation rules, routing logic, reporting dashboards, and onboarding materials so users behave consistently.

This discipline highlights where definitions create unintended consequences. If you reward volume, you’ll get volume, or “MQLs” without quality controls, and you’ll get a funnel full of people who were never going to buy, turning it into a vanity metric vortex. Commercial Ops helps design the system so your incentives and definitions support revenue outcomes rather than vanity metrics.

Designing the buying journey like it’s a product

Buyer experience or BX has never been more important. In 2025 I saw a brand new AI-enabled CRM built around this exact premis. The fact of the matter is that prospects experience your sequence of operational steps long before they experience your service or product. 

A practical way to include Commercial Ops is to treat the buyer journey like a product flow. Map how someone enters, what they see, what they do, and what happens next. Then pressure-test the edge cases, because edge cases are where systems break and reputation suffers. For example - what happens when someone is already a customer and requests a demo? What happens when someone is in a region you don’t serve? What happens when the lead source is missing?

Commercial Ops shines here because it thinks in “if this, then that” mode which supports customer experience and protects team time and reduces the number of “why didn’t it work?” post-mortems.

A lightweight rhythm of business that keeps ops embedded

A short weekly revenue execution check-in (30 - 45 minutes) can be enough: what was executed, what wasn’t, what’s blocked, what decisions are needed and what the funnel signals are saying across your top 3 KPIs. A monthly funnel health review (60 minutes) can focus on looking for leakage points, SLA compliance, conversion trends, and what experiments are working. A quarterly alignment session allows for bigger discussions such as GTM changes, new products in the pipeline that need CRM field and journey thought, tech stack reviews, governance, and what operational investments will support the next stage of growth.

Give Commercial Ops ownership over the “how”

A common pattern is that leadership wants ops accountable while refusing to let ops make operational decisions which slows down execution, creates constant rework, and resentment on all sides.

Commercial leaders and founders should own the “why” and the “what”: commercial goals, target segments, strategic bets and resource allocation. Commercial Ops should own the “how” within its domain: data architecture, lifecycle implementation, routing logic, automation design, tracking and reporting, documentation, and governance.

When Commercial Ops has clear swim-lanes and actual authority, execution speeds up and fewer changes need to be reversed later.

What inclusive leadership looks like day-to-day

Inclusive commercial leadership brings ops in early, while ideas are still being cogitated rather than after deadlines have been promised. It treats operational questions as a necessary discipline that sharpens strategy, tests assumptions, and turns a vision into something buildable, not as “pushback” to be managed. It protects focus by making hard prioritisation decisions, choosing fewer initiatives that can be executed properly over a long list that collapses. It also guards against tech stack proliferation by resisting tool sprawl and one-off workarounds that quietly create cost and complexity later. 

A quick test for whether you’re building an ops-inclusive culture, ask yourself - what happens when something breaks? Does the team ask “who mucked up?” or “what do the systems allow?” [Tip, you are aiming for the latter response!]

Your simple next step: 

Take your next campaign, GTM shift, new product/service, or funnel initiative and write a one-page Strategy-to-Execution Brief with your Commercial Ops lead (or the colleague currently undertaking the MOps and/or SOps work). If you don’t have that capability in-house, or you want an experienced expert to help you, get in touch and we can connect you with a marketing operations or sales operations expert who can help you design the brief, tighten your definitions, and turn the plan into a working system that supports your revenue objectives.

Jan 19, 2026

10 min read

man shaking hands with robot

How to build content AI can trust

For most of my career, content health was a quiet, unglamorous topic that I left to the content team. It mattered, but it rarely felt urgent. Outdated pages were an SEO problem. Inconsistent messaging was a brand problem. Duplicate content was a technical problem. All fixable. All largely contained. And the content team were on top of it all.

AI has changed that and we now need to be much more in front of things.

When AI systems start shaping answers, recommending suppliers and summarising what your company stands for, any weakness in your content estate gets amplified. Old claims get resurfaced. Inconsistent terminology gets repeated. Half-forgotten positioning gets treated as current truth.

That could confuse prospects, shapes expectations before sales ever speak to them, introduce risk late in the buying cycle and undermine confidence in pricing, proof or credibility. If by chance any of that happened, fingers would be pointed at Marketing & Comms.

Content debt used to be an efficiency issue. But it is increasingly a pipeline and reputation risk.

Reality check
If you would be uncomfortable with an AI assistant quoting a page from your site to a prospect in a senior level conversation, that page is not healthy.

What healthy content actually means in an AI world

Healthy content is not about how much you publish. It is about whether your content can be safely trusted by both humans and machines.

In practical terms, healthy content is:

  • Accurate

  • Current

  • Consistent

  • Structured

  • Owned

Content debt is the opposite. It is outdated, duplicated, contradictory or orphaned content that no one maintains but AI systems will happily reuse anyway.

In an AI mediated buying journey, content health becomes part of commercial risk management, not just marketing hygiene.

Most AI used in marketing today is generative AI, powered by large language models. These models generate language by predicting likely word sequences based on patterns in training data. They do not understand your market, your strategy or your legal and commercial constraints.

Two technical terms matter.

Inference is the process of generating an answer in response to a prompt.
Hallucination is when that answer sounds plausible but is factually wrong.

A third term is worth understanding.

Retrieval augmented generation is how many AI systems now work. Instead of relying only on what they learned in training, they actively retrieve content from the web or from indexed sources and stitch answers together from what they find. In plain English, they are not just guessing. They are selecting, weighting and reusing the content that looks most authoritative and coherent.

That is why structure, consistency and accuracy in your own content matter so much. What is most clearly defined and repeatedly reinforced becomes the story the machine tells about you.

Reality check
AI understands patterns and sources, not truth, nuance or consequence.

Where AI genuinely helps with content health

Used properly, AI is extremely useful for the unglamorous but critical work that keeps content trustworthy over time.

In B2B, AI is well suited to:

  • Pulling from various research and source materials

  • Producing first drafts for human refinement

  • Summarising sales calls and extracting recurring questions

  • Identifying duplicate or overlapping content

  • Spotting outdated pages and terminology

  • Supporting content audits and gap analysis

  • Monitoring how your brand and key topics appear in AI generated answers

This is copilot work. It accelerates preparation and maintenance. It absolutely does not replace judgement.

Where AI must not be allowed to decide

AI should not own:

  • Positioning

  • Value propositions

  • Competitive claims

  • Pricing or legal language

  • Final external copy

  • Anything a salesperson will forward directly to a prospect without context

These decisions require commercial judgement, brand accountability and an understanding of consequence.

Reality check
If a decision would normally require senior sign off, AI does not remove that requirement.

Treat content health as an operating discipline

The biggest mistake I see is treating content health as problem for the comms team. It is not. It is an operational one.

A healthy content operation has:

  • Clear ownership for every major content area

  • Defined workflows for creation, review, update and retirement

  • Agreed sources of truth for product, pricing, legal and positioning

  • A regular content audit cadence, not a once a year panic exercise

  • The ability to answer simple questions like what do we have, is it right and who owns it?

A simple operating rhythm that actually works in large B2B organisations looks like this.

  • Quarterly content health review focused on priority prospect problems

  • Named business owner for each problem area and its core pages

  • AI supported audit of accuracy, overlap and freshness

  • Human sign off on any content that defines positioning, proof or claims

  • Retirement or consolidation of weak or conflicting pages

  • One internal source of truth for anything an AI system might quote

This is not process for the sake of process. It is what makes AI safe to use at scale. Without it, AI simply helps you spread inconsistency faster.

Content observability, explained in plain English

A term you will hear more often is content observability. It means being able to see and understand the state of your content estate at any point in time.

In everyday language, it means:

  • Knowing what content exists

  • Knowing where it is used

  • Knowing whether it is accurate and current

  • Knowing whether it is being trusted and referenced

  • Knowing what needs fixing, consolidating or deleting

One uncomfortable truth here. Most content problems persist not because teams do not know what good looks like, but because no one is truly accountable for deleting things. Creation has owners. Maintenance rarely does and often only when you’re moving from one website platform to another. AI makes that neglect visible.

Structure matters more than volume

AI driven discovery rewards clarity and coherence, not publishing frequency.

This means:

  • Clear definitions of key terms

  • Consistent use of language across pages

  • Strong topical depth around the problems you want to be known for

  • Structured content that machines can parse and humans can understand

  • Fewer, better maintained pages rather than endless new ones


Reality check
If your content library is growing faster than your ability to maintain accuracy, you could be building content debt, not authority.

How to measure whether your content is actually healthy

Output metrics like number of pages, words published or time to draft tell you very little, as former CMO, I can tell you we have no interest in those statistics.

In B2B, healthier signals include:

  • Sales teams reusing content in live deals

  • Prospects arriving better informed and with fewer basic questions

  • Reduced late stage misunderstandings and objections

  • More consistent language across regions and teams

  • Growing visibility for the right problems, not just more traffic

If AI assisted content makes it easier for sales to explain, reassure and close, it is helping. If it increases output but creates confusion or inconsistency, it is not. Although, as with most things in our world, that is easier said than done.

The simple rule to remember

AI will amplify whatever state your content is already in.

If your content is accurate, consistent and well governed, AI increases your reach and credibility.
If your content is fragmented, outdated or poorly owned, AI accelerates confusion, risk and sales friction.

AI does not create content problems, but it could expose them and if you’re looking for a competitive edge, and those marginal gains, then best get on top of it.

Call to action

If you are serious about using AI without damaging trust, stop thinking about tools and start thinking about content health as an operating discipline.

  • Audit what you have.

  • Identify and retire content debt.

  • Define and protect sources of truth.

  • Be explicit about ownership and sign off.

  • Use AI to support research, drafting, monitoring and maintenance.

  • Keep strategy, positioning and judgement firmly human.

If you want help turning this into a practical content health and AI readiness programme that your leadership team and sales organisation can trust, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like

Jan 11, 2026

7 min read

SEO reporting lady

How to report SEO internally

It’s quite hard to bring executives along with you on an SEO journey.

It’s easy to explain it all at a high level because everyone has used Google. But it’s much harder for outsiders to understand why it matters, how hard it is to get right and why they must support you in spending time and money on it. I am unsure it helps that SEO is so often bundled with PPC and paid media, which is very binary in its reporting.

Sometimes it feels like SEO reporting is all about communicating upwards…maintaining belief long enough for results to compound.

Why SEO reporting fails in B2B organisations

There are three structural reasons SEO reporting struggles to garner support internally:

  1. Buying cycles are long, so revenue takes time to arrive

  2. SEO delivers influence before conversion; not last click wins.

  3. Most reporting defaults to consumer style metrics, which do not reflect how prospects actually buy in B2B.

When those three collide, SEO can look slow, fuzzy, and optional to people that don’t quite ‘get it’.

Start by agreeing what SEO is responsible for

Before you build a single report, align on what SEO is meant to do.

In our world, SEO is often responsible for:
• Increasing visibility for priority prospect problems
• Educating prospects earlier in the buying process
• Supporting sales conversations with credible content
• Improving conversion quality rather than volume

If SEO is expected to drive revenue in the same way as paid media, it will fail the test unfairly and B2B marketers have to acknowledge the comparisons outsiders will automatically make.

Reality check
If SEO’s role is not articulated well, it will be judged against the wrong criteria.

Stop reporting the wrong things first

Before improving SEO reporting, most teams need to stop reporting something else.

If your report leads with rankings, total traffic, or an SEO score, you are training stakeholders to ask the wrong questions. Those metrics are not useless, but when they dominate reporting they crowd out the signals that actually matter.

Good SEO reporting replaces vanity with relevance.

Separate leading and lagging indicators in every report

Leading indicators are early signals that progress is happening.
Lagging indicators are outcomes that appear later.

This usually looks like:

Leading indicators:
• Impressions in Google Search Console
• Click through rate on priority queries
• Query breadth across a topic
• Ranking stability over time

Lagging indicators
• Conversions
• Assisted conversions
• Pipeline influence
• Revenue

Leading indicators build confidence that the things you and the team are doing are starting to work. Lagging indicators validate that it did.

Reality check
If you only report lagging indicators, SEO will always look like it is underperforming.

Use Search Console

Google Search Console should sit at the heart of SEO reporting because it comes directly from Google and reflects actual search visibility.

Key technical terms to explain internally:

Impressions
How often your pages appear in search results. This measures visibility, not interest.

Clicks
How often searchers choose your result. This reflects interest.

Click through rate
Clicks divided by impressions. This reflects how relevant and credible your result appears in the SERP (Search Engine Results Page).

Average position
The average ranking across impressions. Useful for trend context, not precision.

Query
The exact phrase a prospect searched for. This reveals how prospects describe problems.

Query breadth
The range of related queries you appear for. This indicates growing topical authority.

Search Console should be used to show whether visibility is expanding in the right problem spaces, not whether one keyword moved up or down.

Give executives a simple reporting spine

Good B2B SEO reporting should always answer three questions:

  1. Are we visible for the right prospect problems?

  2. Is trust and credibility increasing?

  3. Is that trust showing up in pipeline behaviour?

Whenever I stepped into new CMO roles, it would make me so happy to see something that at least resembled that thought process.

Explain SERPs and intent to non-marketers

A SERP, or Search Engine Results Page, is what Google shows after a search.

You cannot report on SEO properly without referencing the SERP, because the SERP reveals search intent, meaning what the searcher is actually trying to achieve.

Intent typically falls into patterns like learning, comparing, validating, or deciding.

If your content does not match the dominant intent of the SERP, rankings alone will not convert.

Reality check
If traffic is not converting, the answer is usually in the SERP. A spreadsheet shows performance while the gold ol’ SERP shows intent. If Google is rewarding educational content, expect education behaviour, not conversions.

Show contribution without overclaiming revenue

This is where B2B marketers can look a little silly. Most SEO value shows up as assisted influence, not last click revenue.

An assisted conversion is when SEO influenced a prospect’s journey but was not the final interaction before conversion.

Prospects often discover, research, and validate through organic search weeks before they speak to sales. By the time they convert, they already know who you are.

If reporting only credits the final click, SEO will appear invisible. It’s really important that B2B marketers control the narrative and communicate the full picture, every time.  

Reality check
If SEO never appears in assisted conversions, either SEO is failing or attribution is broken.

Connect SEO reporting to GA4 and CRM language

GA4 measures what prospects do after they land on your site.

Key concepts to explain simply:

Conversion
A tracked action that matters commercially.

Attribution
How credit for conversions is assigned across channels.

Assisted influence
Where SEO supports the journey without closing it.

In CRM terms, SEO should be discussed in relation to
• Deal quality
• Sales velocity
• Objection handling
• Content usage in live deals

The best Chief Marketing/Commercial/Revenue Officer’s care less about where you rank and more about whether prospects arrive informed, confident, and easier to close. Why? Because they can use that narrative and evidence upwards (and sidewards with sales peers).

Report less often, but with more narrative

Quarterly SEO reporting can focus on:
• Leading indicators
• Visibility trends
• Early behavioural signals

With a narrative rich story around:
• Assisted influence
• Pipeline contribution
• Strategic progress against priority topics

Giving your CMO that insight is so useful for them to have in their arsenal.

Reality check
If your report cannot be explained verbally to a sales leader in five minutes, you may not understand it well enough.

Understand evidence versus proof

SEO reporting rarely provides courtroom proof and, like many things with marketing, there does need to be some level of believe that if you do the right things, the results will come. Reporting should gradually build that evidence that value is accruing over time.
It builds evidence that value is accruing over time.

Expecting certainty too early is one of the fastest ways to increase the risk of killing a good programme that would have produced in the end.

The metrics that quietly kill SEO programmes

Avoid these in senior reporting:

•       Vanity ranking snapshots

•        Total organic traffic without intent segmentation

•       Single KPI SEO scorecards

•       Last click only revenue charts

•       Data overload

As a former CMO, I can tell you that I really don’t want to see table after table or screenshot after screenshot of SEMrush or various tools. I want the numbers I should care about and your, evidenced, narrative. Leave the rest for the appendix.

The simple rule to remember

SEO reporting exists to maintain confidence while authority compounds.

If SEO is reported like a channel that should perform instantly, you are encouraging your stakeholders to come to the wrong conclusions and it will be hard to get them back after you’ve lost them.

Call to action

If you want SEO to survive and thrive internally, stop reporting it like a consumer channel.

Agree what SEO is responsible for. Separate leading and lagging indicators. Use Search Console to show growing visibility in the right problem spaces. Connect that visibility to assisted influence, sales confidence, and pipeline quality over time.

If you want help building an SEO reporting approach that senior stakeholders actually trust, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

Jan 8, 2026

7 min read

man holding ruler

How to measure SEO success

All B2B Marketer’s know that SEO matters but we often measure it in ways that make us look busy rather than useful. Rankings go up, traffic goes up, and yet nothing changes commercially. Eventually someone senior decides SEO is a hobby and cuts it.

So, let’s be clear on what success actually means.

In our world, winning in SEO does not mean ranking first. It means earning a disproportionate share of visibility and trust for the prospect questions that matter and doing so consistently enough to influence real buying decisions over time.

Start by separating leading and lagging indicators

This distinction really matters because it prevents good work being killed too early.

Leading indicators are early signals that progress is happening before revenue shows up.
Lagging indicators are outcomes that arrive later, such as pipeline and revenue.

In B2B, lagging indicators move slowly because buying cycles are long. If we only measure lagging indicators, we risk concluding SEO is failing long before it has had a chance to work.

Reality Check
If leading indicators are not improving, SEO is probably not working.
If leading indicators are improving but revenue has not arrived yet, be patient.

Decide what SEO is meant to achieve commercially

This is where many teams go wrong. They measure whatever a dashboard makes easy to measure.

Common B2B objectives include:
• Increasing qualified inbound enquiries from target prospects
• Improving conversion rates on high intent pages
• Reducing friction in sales conversations by educating prospects earlier

So it’s best to build your reporting with this in mind and being ruthless with vanity metrics.

 Use Search Console as your source of truth

Google Search Console is obviously their own reporting tool for how your site performs in Google Search. It is not perfect, by any means, but it is the closest thing you have to ground truth for organic visibility.

Here are the Search Console metrics that matter, explained plainly.

Impressions
An impression is counted when your page appears in a search result. In plain English, this reflects visibility, not interest.

Clicks
A click is when someone selects your result and lands on your site. This reflects interest turning into action.

Click through rate
Click through rate is clicks divided by impressions. It reflects how relevant and credible your result appears in the SERP (Search Engine Results Page).

Average position
Average position is the average ranking of your result across impressions. It is a rough indicator of competitiveness but can be misleading when rankings fluctuate or when multiple URLs rank.

Query
A query is the exact phrase typed by a searcher. This is how prospects describe their problem in their own words. Super insightful for marketers.

Landing page
A landing page is the page that earns the impression or click. This is the asset doing the work.

Measure success in a clear hierarchy

To avoid dashboard sprawl, measure SEO in this order.

  1. Visibility for the right problems
    Impressions growth for priority topics and prospect questions.

  2. Trust and engagement signals
    Click through rate improvement, ranking stability, and repeat exposure in relevant SERPs.

  3. Commercial contribution
    Assisted conversions, conversion rates on high intent pages, and pipeline influence.

These signals reflect progress and help so much in demonstrating marketing’s value.

Measure at three levels: query, page, and topic

Query level
This shows which prospect questions you are earning visibility for.

Track:
• Impressions for priority query groups
• Click through rate changes on high intent queries
• Query breadth, meaning how many related queries you appear for

Query breadth is an indicator of topical authority building, not proof of it.

Page level
This shows which pages earn trust over time.

Good things to track include:
• Clicks and impressions per page
• Click through rate per page
• Average position trends
• Ranking stability, meaning how steady positions are rather than volatile

Unstable rankings often correlate with weaker authority in that SERP.

Topic level
This shows whether authority is compounding.

It’s useful to track:
• Impression growth across a topic cluster
• Query expansion, meaning ranking for terms you did not explicitly target
• Internal linking impact across related pages

These trends indicate whether search engines are increasingly associating you with a topic.

Use SERP checks to validate your data

SERP is a Search Engine Results Page.

You cannot measure SEO properly without looking at the SERP itself. The SERP shows what Google believes the searcher wants at that moment.

So, check:
• Whether your content type matches what ranks
• Whether SERP features absorb clicks
• Whether you are competing with publishers, vendors, or communities

Reality check
If metrics look healthy but prospects do not convert, you may be winning visibility for the wrong intent.

Connect Search Console to GA4 to measure behaviour

GA4, Google Analytics 4, measures what people do after they land on your site.

This is where SEO begins to connect to observable outcomes.

Key terms to understand.

Conversion
A conversion is a tracked action that matters commercially, such as a demo request or pricing page view.

Attribution
Attribution is how credit for a conversion is assigned across touchpoints.

Assisted conversions and why they matter in B2B

An assisted conversion is when organic search helps move a prospect towards a conversion, even though it was not the final interaction before they converted.

In plain English, SEO helped, but it did not get the credit.

This happens because most analytics tools default to last click attribution, which only gives credit to the final touchpoint. In B2B, that final touchpoint is often direct traffic, email, paid media, or sales outreach.

A simple example makes this clearer.

A prospect searches for a problem they are trying to understand and finds your content via organic search. They read it, learn something, and start to trust your thinking. Days or weeks later, they return via a branded search, a LinkedIn post, or a sales email and request a demo.

In that journey, organic search played a critical role, but it was not the last click. That initial organic visit is recorded as an assist, not a conversion.

This is why SEO often shows up as an assisted conversion in B2B. Prospects use search to research, learn, and validate long before they are ready to act. By the time they convert, they already know who you are.

Reality check
If you only measure last click conversions, you will almost always undervalue SEO in B2B. Assisted conversions are where SEO’s real influence usually shows up.

Be honest about CRM and pipeline influence

SEO rarely closes deals directly in B2B.

Its value more often shows up as
• Better educated prospects
• Higher quality conversations
• Improved sales velocity
• Increased deal confidence

If organic search never appears in assisted conversions or influenced pipeline, either SEO is underperforming or tracking is incomplete. And that’s an important distinction for you to bear in mind.

Metrics that can misdirect us

If you want to spot misleading reporting quickly, it often includes:
• Vanity ranking snapshots without context
• Total organic traffic without intent segmentation
• Single KPI SEO scorecards
• Last click only conversion reporting

They may make us feel better and be easier for other stakeholders to understand, but they will not be optimal.

Tools that help

Here’s some tools that I use:

Google Search Console for visibility and authority signals.
GA4 for behaviour and conversion analysis.
Looker Studio for combining data sources into one narrative.
Ahrefs or Semrush for competitive context and ranking stability.

But remember, tools cannot tell you what to be known for and can’t judge a propsect’s trust. That’s all done to you!

The simple rule to remember

If your SEO reporting would impress someone who does not understand your prospects or your revenue model, it is probably not the reporting your business needs. Its too complicated and too nuanced for that.

Measure visibility first, then trust, then commercial impact. In that order.

Call to action

If we are serious about measuring SEO success in B2B marketing, it’s important we don’t hide behind rankings.

A good plan would be to pick three topics you want to be known for. Track impressions, click through rate, query breadth, and ranking stability for those topics. Then connect Search Console to GA4 and define conversions that reflect real prospect intent, not vanity engagement. Learn and refine as you go.

If you want help building an SEO measurement framework that senior stakeholders will respect, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

Jan 7, 2026

7 min read

man looking at blueprints

How to structure content so authority compounds

One of the reasons B2B content underperforms is not quality it is structure. Or lack of it.

Content teams can product useful, sensible, very good content. But because it is scattered, disconnected, or constantly changing direction, topical authority never compounds i.e. there is a bigger picture that needs to be realised over time, reinforcing the same ideas repeatedly over time.

There are quite a few technical terms but I’ll do my best to break them down and explain them clearly as we go.

Start with buyer problems, not content formats

I’ve seen so many content strategies start with formats like blogs, guides, videos, or white papers. But that is backwards.

Authority compounds when content is organised around buyer problems, meaning the real challenges buyers are trying to solve, not the assets marketing wants to produce.

This matters because topical authority is built when search engines repeatedly see your site addressing the same problem space clearly and consistently.

Topical authority simply means how strongly your website is associated with a specific subject. In plain English, do search engines believe you genuinely know what you are talking about?

Reality check
I like to be really binary. If a piece of content does not clearly reinforce one of your core buyer problems, do not publish it.

Decide what you are building authority around

You cannot build authority around everything. It’s just too hard and none of us are blessed with the resources required. Unless you’re extremely lucky, you have to choose.

So, focus becomes a technical decision, not a creative one.

When teams publish across too many topics, they dilute entity association, which is how search engines connect your brand name with specific concepts over time.

Entity association means that when your brand appears online, it repeatedly shows up in connection with the same ideas. That repetition is how recognition forms.

Reality check
If a new topic does not strengthen an existing authority area, it weakens your overall signal.

Understand the role of a core page

For each problem you choose to focus on, there should be a core page, sometimes called a pillar page.

A core page is the main page that defines the problem, sets shared language, and anchors your point of view.

Its job is to:
• Explain the problem clearly in everyday language
• Define key terms and concepts
• Outline approaches, trade-offs, and options
• Reflect how buyers actually think

Search engines use this page as a reference point when it is reinforced correctly.

Reality check
If you cannot point to the core page a piece of content supports, your structure is already breaking.

Supporting pages exist to answer specific questions

Once a core page exists, you create supporting pages.

Supporting pages answer specific buyer questions, objections, comparisons, or implementation concerns related to the core problem.

This structure creates semantic overlap, which means multiple pages on your site cover closely related questions using similar language and concepts.

Semantic overlap helps search engines understand that your site understands a topic in depth rather than mentioning it once.

Each supporting page should clearly relate back to the core problem. If it does not strengthen the core page, it should not exist.

Internal linking reinforces meaning, not just rankings

Internal linking is often treated as a technical SEO task. It is actually a meaning signal.

Internal linking is the practice of linking from one page on your site to another. When done deliberately, it tells search engines
• Which pages matter most
• How concepts relate to each other
• Which topics you consider authoritative

A strong internal linking structure:
• Links supporting pages back to the core page
• Links laterally between closely related questions
• Uses consistent, buyer aligned language

This reinforces topical authority and entity association at the same time.

Avoid keyword cannibalisation by managing intent

Keyword cannibalisation happens when multiple pages on your site target the same search intent, meaning the same underlying goal of the searcher.

Search intent might be learning, comparing, validating, or deciding.

The fix is simple
• One page per intent

If two pages answer the same question for the same reader at the same stage, they compete.

Cannibalisation is usually a structural problem, not a keyword problem.

The fastest ways to kill compounding authority

If you want to undo progress quickly, these are the most reliable ways.

• Rebranding language every year
• Restarting content themes with each new CMO (and we know how short their tenures are)
• Publishing for internal politics rather than buyer problems (especially egotistic service line heads)
• Letting the content calendar dictate strategy
• Launching new topic areas before existing ones mature

One way to think about it is that these behaviours reset any authority you had building.

How to know when a topic is complete enough

Many teams abandon topics too early.

A topic is usually complete enough when:
• You rank for a wide range of related queries
• Search impressions grow without new optimisation
• Sales teams use multiple pieces in live deals
• New content adds marginal value rather than new ground

At this point, content maintenance matters more than expansion.

Content maintenance means updating language, consolidating overlap, and strengthening internal links.

How structure changes SERP behaviour

As topical authority increases, you will see changes in SERP (Search Engine Results Page) behaviour, meaning how your pages perform in search results.

These include:
• Faster ranking velocity, meaning new pages rank more quickly
• Greater ranking stability, meaning positions fluctuate less
• Query expansion, meaning you rank for terms you did not explicitly target
• Reduced reliance on heavy optimisation

This is how authority shows up before obvious wins.

The simple rule to remember

SEO rewards authority.
Authority compounds through structure.

Without structure, effort resets.
With structure, effort compounds.

If your content library does not make it obvious what you are known for, neither search engines nor prospective clients will work it out for you.

Tools that help observe authority building

As you’d expect, there’s tools out there to help you observe patterns.

Google Search Console shows query breadth, impressions, and early authority signals.
Ahrefs or Semrush help analyse topical coverage and competitor visibility.
Crawlers like Screaming Frog reveal whether internal linking reinforces structure.
Brand monitoring tools help track entity association beyond links.

Just be cautious and don’t rely on them too much. Tools cannot tell you what to be known for. They cannot judge prospect trust. They support judgement, not replace it.

Call to action

If you want your content to actually build authority, stop asking what to publish next and start asking what you are reinforcing.

Write down the buyer problems you want to be known for solving. Then map your existing content against them. If most of it does not clearly support those problems, authority will not compound.

Focus on fewer topics. Build depth. Structure deliberately.

If you want help turning your content into a system that compounds authority rather than scattering it, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 6, 2026

6 min read

man building google ranking authority

How to build authority that actually helps you win keywords

As always, I like to be clear on what the key word in the question means.

Authority is a trust signal inferred over time, not something assigned or scored in isolation. And search engines and AI platforms infer authority by observing patterns across many signals.

Those patterns include:
• Depth and consistency of coverage around a topic
• Repeated association between your brand and specific concepts
• External references that reinforce that association
• Long term performance stability in search results
• Signals that correlate with trust and usefulness

SEO tools try to approximate these signals and search engines infer them directly by observing behaviour and outcomes at scale.

The three types of authority that matter in B2B

To make authority actionable, I think it helps to separate it into three layers:

Domain authority
Overall trust in your site and brand. This affects how easily new pages can rank at all.

Topical authority
How strongly your site is associated with a specific subject. In B2B, this is usually the most important layer.

Brand authority
Whether buyers and the wider market recognise your name in connection with a problem or solution, independent of your website.

Most B2B teams struggle because they chase domain authority when what they actually need is topical and brand authority first. Hopefully you just experienced a lightbulb moment.  

How search engines infer topical authority

This is where hopefully we can stop being abstract.

Search engines infer topical authority by looking for reinforcement across multiple related signals, not a single page.

These include
• The breadth of related queries your site ranks for
• Consistent internal linking between pages on the same theme
• Semantic overlap across content answering adjacent questions
• External references that mention your brand in topical context
• Stable visibility across related searches over time

So basically, one good page can get you noticed whilst a connected set of good pages tells search engines you know the subject. And it’s safe to infer that isolated content rarely builds lasting authority.

Why most B2B content does not build authority

Publishing content does not automatically build authority. Some many companies pump out volumes of ‘stuff’ and look extremely busy but, to a critical eye, it’s riddled with missteps.

Common mistakes include:
• Writing across too many topics with no depth
• Publishing content to satisfy keyword lists rather than buyer questions
• Treating each page as an isolated SEO asset
• Constantly switching focus before authority compounds
• Producing content sales teams never use

Authority comes from coherence and repetition, not volume.

Authority is built outside SEO before it shows up in SEO

This is an uncomfortable truth:

In B2B, authority usually forms first through
• Sales conversations and lived experience
• Thought leadership in trusted environments
• Partnerships, associations and ecosystems
• Analyst, peer and industry recognition

SEO becomes effective when it reflects something that already exists and rarely creates authority on its own.

How to build topical authority deliberately

Topical authority is the most controllable form of authority for B2B marketers.

A deliberate approach could look like this:
• Choose a small number of problems you want to be known for solving
• Map the full set of buyer questions around those problems
• Get the team creating content that answers those questions clearly and consistently
• Reinforce those ideas through intentional internal linking
• Maintain focus long enough for patterns to emerge

For me, with tenures so low in B2B marketing, I always think of ‘plant trees whose shade you know you may never sit in’. The results will come but how fast only the Google Gods know.

Why backlinks still matter

Some people like to think of backlinks as 'up votes' but they are closer to contextual endorsements.

In B2B, the links that matter most:
• Sit within relevant editorial or industry context
• Reinforce your association with a topic
• Come from sources buyers already trust
• Accumulate naturally over time

Search engines also appear to observe repeated brand mentions and citations, especially when they reinforce topical relevance.

How authority changes SERP behaviour

This is a critical but often missed point.

As authority increases, you will see:
• New pages ranking faster with less optimisation
• Pages entering more competitive Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs)
• Rankings becoming more stable, not volatile
• Google favouring your pages over technically similar competitors

How sales accelerate authority if you let it

Talking with actual clients and directly with sales teams always surfaces the strongest authority signals available. I get so frustrated when marketers do not take the path of least resistance to driving context, speak to clients. It makes our lives so much easier.

Repeated objections, explanations and buyer questions show exactly where trust needs to be built. So, as marketers, if we can turn that into clear explanations, confident points of view and practical guidance, content becomes powerful proof. When sales actually use that content in prospecting and live deals, marketing benefits from authority uplifts and everything compounds faster.

How to tell authority is growing before rankings move

Better experts than I say that they can see authority groing before seeing the impact in rankings.

Early signals include:
• Ranking for a wider range of related queries
• Rising impressions without major optimisation changes
• Gradual, stable ranking improvements rather than spikes
• Stronger internal linking impact
• Content being referenced in sales conversations

So we can be confident that rankings lag authority. Waiting for position one in Google rankings to validate progress is a mistake… and its important for us to be able to articulate this point to any dismissive internal stakeholders.

The simple rule to remember

SEO rewards authority.
Authority is inferred from consistent, credible presence.
Presence is earned by being genuinely useful.

If you want to win harder keywords, we need to build the reputation that deserves them first.

Tools that actually help with authority building

Tools do not create authority, but they can help you observe signals, spot patterns, and avoid guessing. Used properly, they support judgement rather than replace it.

Google Search Console
Essential for understanding query breadth, impression growth, and early authority signals before rankings move.

Ahrefs or Semrush
Useful for analysing topical coverage, competitor visibility, and how authority distributes across pages rather than chasing single keywords.

Screaming Frog or similar crawlers
Helps diagnose internal linking strength and whether your content structure actually reinforces topical authority.

Brand monitoring tools
Useful for spotting mentions, citations and external references that reinforce authority beyond links.

The rule with tools is simple. If they help you see patterns, use them. If they push you toward volume and vanity metrics, have some discipline and hold yourself back.

Call to action

If you are serious about winning the keywords that matter in B2B, stop asking what to publish next and start asking what you want to be known for.

Write down the problems your best buyers trust you to help them solve. Then look honestly at your content, your sales conversations and your external presence. Because if those things are fragmented, authority will be too.

Focus on fewer topics. Go deeper. Reinforce your point of view everywhere it matters.

If you want help turning this into a deliberate authority building strategy that supports SEO, sales and long-term growth, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like

 

Jan 6, 2026

6 min read

lady holding SEO trophy aloft

How to decide which keywords are worth winning

Before we dive into this topic how to decide which keywords are worth winning, I think it’s worth being clear what ‘winning’ actually means in B2B marketing. It doesn’t necessarily mean owning the Search Engine Results Page…or capturing every single click.

In our world, just having more than our fair share of visibility is usually enough. The goal is to be consistently present, credible, and influential for the prospective clients that matter, not to dominate traffic charts.

I think the average marketer on the street feels that winning is ranking number one for a broad head term, generating lots of traffic and being competitors for every industry related keywords.

But winning is probably more like showing up reliably during buyer research, being able to support live sales conversations, having and owning a point of view that prospective clients may trust and, overall, improving pipeline quality.

If ranking does not help any of that, it is not a win.

Start with what you already rank for

Before deciding what you could win, it’s good practice to understand what you already own.

Most B2B websites already rank for far more queries than teams realise. Not just headline keywords, but dozens or hundreds of related terms that show how search engines already understand (or not) your relevance and authority.

This baseline matters because:
• It shows where you already have credibility to build on
• It reveals near win opportunities
• It prevents duplicated effort across similar topics
• It grounds decisions in reality

The four things that must stack up

To win a keyword in B2B, four conditions need to broadly stack up.

• Authority
• Intent alignment
• Content advantage
• Commercial relevance

You do not need all four to be perfect. But if one is missing entirely, you are unlikely to win in any meaningful way.

Keyword difficulty is context, not a decision

Keyword difficulty is one of the most misunderstood SEO metrics.

Most tools calculate difficulty by analysing the authority and backlink profiles of pages currently ranking. It tells you how strong the competition is, not whether you should compete.

Difficulty does not tell you:
• Whether the keyword is worth winning
• How long it will take to rank
• Whether ranking will support revenue

Treat difficulty as context. Never as a green or red light.

Step 1. Compare your authority honestly

Look at the pages currently ranking and ask
• Are these global publishers, niche specialists, or vendors?
• How strong are their domains compared to yours?
• Do they have deep topical authority or general strength?

If the SERP is dominated by brands with fundamentally stronger authority than you, the honest answer to can we realistically earn a fair share of visibility here is usually no.

Step 2. Decide if this is a domain or page level battle

Not all keywords require the same level of authority.

A simple rule helps
• If the SERP is dominated by broad category pages, this is a domain level battle
• If it is dominated by specific guides or explainers, it is more likely a page level battle

This is why narrow, intent rich keywords are often more realistic targets in B2B.

If winning this keyword would require your entire domain to outrank brands it has never realistically competed with before, SEO is not the right lever today and the topic needs broader marketing and brand work first.
If winning depends on one strong page answering an unmet need better than what exists, this is a realistic SEO opportunity.

Step 3. Decide if you can genuinely create something better

This is not about writing more words.

Ask
• Can we explain this more clearly than what already exists?
• Can we add insight competitors cannot?
• Can we reflect real buyer questions and objections?
• Can we bring first-hand experience, data, or a usable framework?

If the only advantage you can articulate is that your content will be more comprehensive, you probably do not have a real advantage.

Search engines really like to reward usefulness, not effort.

Step 4. Assess backlink reality, not backlink theory

Backlinks still matter. But in B2B, they are about credibility, not scale.

Ask
• Do the top-ranking pages have strong editorial or industry links?
• Are those links earned through expertise or just volume?
• Can we realistically earn comparable references over time?

If winning requires link tactics that only work as long as nobody asks how they are done, walk away.

Sustainable rankings come from authority, partnerships, and trust maintained over a period of time.

Step 5. Factor in time to value

Timing also matters.

Ask:
• How long would this realistically take to rank?
• Does that timeline align with business priorities?
• Will the topic still matter when we get there?

A keyword can be winnable and still be the wrong use of time. Time to value is a commercial decision, not an SEO one so this is another consideration that goes into your pot.

Step 6. Apply the B2B commercial filter

This is where SEO becomes marketing.

Ask:
• Does this keyword map to real sales conversations?
• Does it reduce friction or objections?
• Does it help buyers make decisions?
• Would sales teams actually use this content?

The three decisions every keyword must end with

I think every keyword assessment should end with one clear outcome.

• Go now
• Park it
• Walk away

“Go now” does not mean you expect to own the SERP. It means the keyword is important enough that earning a fair share of credible visibility will influence buying decisions.

Just like when sales teams are deciding to ‘no bid’ an RFP that has come their way…A well-reasoned ‘no’ is often the most valuable SEO decision a B2B marketing team can make.

Common mistakes

Most failures that I've seen over the years fall into three categories.

Metric led mistakes
• Treating difficulty scores as decision makers
• Prioritising volume over intent

Authority blind mistakes
• Assuming good content can overcome any SERP
• Underestimating entrenched competitors

Commercial blind mistakes
• Chasing visibility instead of influence
• Ignoring how sales will actually use the content

Key buzzwords explained

• Keyword difficulty, an estimate of competition strength
• Domain authority, trust built across topics
• Page authority, strength of one page for one query
• Topical authority, credibility built through depth
• Commercial relevance, whether ranking influences revenue reality

Why this matters even more now

The same signals that determine who ranks also influence how AI tools summarise, recommend, and describe brands.

AI systems do not reward dominance. They reward repeated, credible presence across related topics. If you cannot win trust in a SERP, AI systems are unlikely to surface you accurately or at all.

Call to action

If you are serious about making SEO work in B2B, stop asking whether a keyword looks attractive and start try diving deeper to ask whether it is even worth winning.

Write down the keywords your team is currently targeting. Then assess each one honestly.

• Do we already have, or can we realistically earn, a fair share of visibility on this topic?
• Do we have the authority to compete?
• Does the intent match how we sell?
• Would ranking actually help revenue?

If you want an external contractor or agency to help you decide which keywords are winnable, and for the right reasons, get in touch and we will personally introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 6, 2026

6 min read

a guy searching on google with a magnifying glass

How to analyse SERP to improve your rankings

Very few marketers actually analyse the SERP properly.

Instead, they look at a keyword in a tool, see search volume and a difficulty score, assume it is worth targeting, and only realise too late that the content never had a chance. It ranks badly or worse it ranks fine but attracts the wrong audience.

I’ve certainly been guilty of skipping SERP analysis in the past too. 

What is a SERP analysis

SERP means Search Engine Results Page. It is the page Google shows after a search.

SERP analysis is the process of manually reviewing that page to understand what Google believes the searcher wants and what type of content satisfies that intent.

This is not an SEO hygiene task. It is more impactful than that.

Many SERPs are winnable. Very few are worth winning. But if you ignore you are competing with Google’s interpretation of the query. And you’ll lose.

When to do it

You should conduct the analysis before you commit to anything.

Specifically:
• Before choosing a primary keyword
• Before writing a content brief
• Before updating an existing page
• Before assuming a keyword is commercially valuable

If you analyse everything after publishing, you are already too late.

What to check every time:
• Dominant intent
• Dominant format
• Dominant angle
• Who is winning
• SERP features present
• Winnable vs worth winning decision

If you cannot confidently answer each of these, you still have work to do.

Step 1. Search the keywords manually

Do not rely on tool screenshots. Search the keyword yourself. Put the graft in.

Use an incognito browser to reduce personalisation and check the correct location and language where relevant.

Your job here is not to admire results. It is to diagnose intent.

Step 2. Identify the dominant search intent

Search intent is the reason behind the query. What the user is trying to achieve.

Look at the top results and decide which intent dominates
• Informational, definitions, explanations, how to guides
• Commercial investigation, comparisons, best lists, alternatives
• Transactional, product pages, category pages, pricing
• Navigational, brand or product name searches

If most results are guides, the intent is informational.
If most results are comparisons, the intent is evaluative.
If most results are product pages, the intent is closer to purchase.

Trying to rank the wrong type of page against the dominant intent is the fastest way to waste effort.

Step 3. Confirm the winning format

Intent tells you what the user wants. Format tells you how they want it delivered.

Check whether the top results are dominated by
• Long form guides
• Short definitions
• List posts
• Tools or calculators
• Product or category pages
• Videos

If one format dominates, it is part of the intent. You can improve on it. You shouldn’t really ignore it.

Some common mistakes:
• Targeting the wrong intent by building a product or service page where the SERP clearly rewards educational content, or vice versa
• Relying too heavily on keyword metrics like volume or difficulty instead of what the results page is actually showing
• Treating keyword tools as the strategy rather than a validation step
• Over prioritising high volume terms that are dominated by powerful brands or irrelevant formats
• Ignoring intent rich long tail queries that align far more closely with real buyer questions and decision stages

I have also seen teams walk away from attractive looking keywords after SERP analysis and instead focus on narrower, intent rich queries that generated real inbound enquiries.

One company I worked with in the Capital Markets sector spotted an opportunity around administration for SPACs(Special Purpose Acquisition Companies). The search volume was low and most SEO tools would have dismissed it immediately.

But the SERP told a different story.

The topic was emerging, the intent was commercial, the competition was weak, and from a service delivery point of view it was highly profitable. They focused on it deliberately and owned it.

At one point they were winning around 90 percent of SPAC deals in Europe, and journalists researching the topic started contacting them directly for interviews.

Low traffic. Massive impact.

That is what good SERP analysis looks like in the real world.

Step 4. Identify the dominant angle

Most SERPs also have a clear angle. This is the framing that repeats across top results.

Examples include
• For enterprise teams
• For beginners
• Fastest approach
• Cheapest options
• Best tools for a specific use case

Scan titles and headings. If several results repeat the same framing, Google is rewarding that angle.

Your goal is not to be different for the sake of it. It is to be clearer, more useful, or more relevant to your buyers.

Step 5. Assess who you are competing with

Now look at who is ranking.

Ask
• Are major publishers dominating
• Are vendors dominating
• Are niche specialists winning
• Are directories or communities present

This tells you how hard the SERP will be to break into and what level of authority is expected.

It’s best to be really subjective at this stage. Some SERPs are technically winnable but commercially pointless.

Step 6. Pay attention to SERP features

SERPs are no longer ten blue links.

Look for features like
• Featured snippets
• People Also Ask boxes
• Video carousels
• AI generated summaries where present

These features reveal what users want to know next and how Google prefers to surface answers. They can also reduce click through even if you rank well.

Step 7. Estimate traffic potential, not just search volume

Search volume is a directional estimate for one term. It is often misleading.

Traffic potential is the broader opportunity for one page to rank across many related queries.

In B2B marketing, relevance and commercial value matter more than big numbers.

Step 8. Make the decision

Every SERP analysis should end with one clear decision being made:
• Build content now
• Park it and revisit later
• Walk away entirely

Once this decision is made, it should be locked. Do not reopen intent or format later to suit opinions or internal politics.

This is why SERP analysis can be considered to have strategic vlaue, not just another SEO task.

Tools that help

It’s so easy for marketers to fall into the trap of running straight to sign up for cloud-based tools but we have to realise that they support SERP analysis, they don’t actually perform it.  

Useful ones include
• Google Search Console for real queries you already appear for
• Ahrefs for SERP comparison, traffic potential and competitor context
• Semrush for intent signals, SERP features and keyword gap analysis

If you do not do manual SERP analysis, no tool will magically save you.

Key buzzwords explained

• SERP, the results page Google shows
• SERP analysis, reviewing that page to understand intent and competition
• Search intent, what the searcher is trying to achieve
• Content format, the type of page Google is rewarding
• Angle, the framing repeated across top results
• Traffic potential, the broader traffic a page could earn

Why SERP analysis matters even more now

The same SERP signals that shape rankings also influence how AI tools summarise topics and recommend brands.

AI systems amplify SERP misunderstandings. They do not correct them.

Call to action

If you want better results from SEO and content, analyse the SERP before you write anything.

Pick one keyword you are targeting right now. Search it. Study the first page honestly.

Ask yourself
• Does our content match the dominant intent?
• Are we using the format the SERP rewards?
• Do we have a genuinely stronger angle?
• Is this SERP even worth winning for our business?

If you want help building SERP analysis into your keyword and content process, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

Jan 5, 2026

7 min read

A woman with a magnifying glass looking into a treasure chest

How to do keyword research

Keyword research is one of the easiest ways for B2B marketing teams to waste time without realising it.

Bad keyword research creates content that ranks but does not convert, traffic that looks good in reports but goes nowhere, and frustrates CMOs that suspected there was a disconnect between writing for SEO and what we actually needed to write. I know, because I’ve been there.

So it's not an SEO problem. It is a keyword research problem.

Step 1. Start with buyer questions, not tools

A keyword is simply the phrase someone types into a search engine. In B2B marketing, those phrases usually reflect a question, a concern, or a decision being made by a committee of different stakeholders.

Before you open a tool, pull real language from real conversations:

  • Sales calls, discovery notes, objections, competitor comparisons

  • Customer success and support tickets, onboarding questions, renewal risk

  • RFP documents and lost deal notes

  • Internal Slack messages that start with “Does anyone know…”

  • And the absolute nirvana, talk to clients! Yes, even you marketers!

Those who follow me know I get very frustrated with marketers that don’t talk to clients as much as possible. This is a scenario where it helps, so, so much.

Turn that into a list of buyer questions in plain English. Buyer language, not your product language.

Step 2. Translate questions into intent

Search intent is the reason behind a search. What the buyer is trying to do?

In B2B marketing, intent usually falls into these buckets:
• Problem understanding, what is this, why is it happening
• Solution exploration, what are the options, what approaches exist
• Comparison, alternatives, best tools, vendor shortlists
• Validation, proof, pricing, implementation, risk, reviews, case studies

Do not treat all keywords equally. Two phrases can look similar but signal totally different intent.

It is also worth remembering that the same keywords, topics and intent signals now shape how AI tools summarise, recommend and describe your brand, not just how you rank in Google.

Step 3. Do SERP analysis, every time

SERP means Search Engine Results Page. It is the page Google shows after a search. SERP analysis is manually reviewing that page to understand what Google believes the searcher wants.

This step is non-negotiable.

For every priority keyword, search it and answer these questions:
• What intent is Google rewarding here, education, comparison, or purchase focused
• What format wins, guides, list posts, product pages, category pages, tools, videos
• Who is ranking, publishers, vendors, communities, directories
• What angles keep repeating, definitions, templates, pricing, pros and cons
• What is missing, what could you say better or more clearly

If your planned content does not match the intent and format of the SERP, you are not competing with competitors. You are competing with Google’s interpretation of the query. You will lose.

Step 4. Use tools to expand and validate, not to decide

Tools are essential, but they are not the strategy. Use them to expand your list, validate language, and understand competitive context.

Here are the tools most B2B teams actually use, and what each is good for:

Google Search Console: Use it to see the real queries that already drive impressions and clicks to your site. This is buyer language you have already earned. It can be clunky, but you’ll soon find the stats you need.

Google autocomplete and People Also Ask: Use them to discover how buyers phrase questions and what related questions cluster around a topic.

Ahrefs: Use it for keyword discovery, SERP comparison, and concepts like parent topics and traffic potential. It is strong for understanding what one page could realistically rank for, not just one keyword.

Semrush: Use it for keyword expansion and competitor analysis, especially keyword gap analysis. Keyword gap means identifying keywords competitors rank for that you do not.

Keyword Insights: Use it to group large keyword lists into topic clusters and reduce the risk of cannibalisation.

Two important terms to keep straight:
• Search volume is an estimate of how often a keyword is searched. It is directional, not precise. In our B2B world, low volume often means high value.
• Keyword difficulty is a tool generated estimate of ranking difficulty. Useful for context, not a decision maker.

Step 5. Consider topic clusters to avoid cannibalisation

Sorry, we’re getting a bit technical and buzzword heavy. I’ll try and keep things simple and high level. A topic cluster is a structured set of pages around one core theme. It usually includes:
• A core page that covers the main topic
• Supporting pages that answer specific questions
• Comparison pages for alternatives and evaluation
• Validation pages like case studies, implementation, pricing, and risk

Keyword cannibalisation happens when multiple pages on your site target the same intent and compete with each other. That splits authority and confuses search engines.

A simple rule helps: one page per intent. If two pages are trying to answer the same question for the same reader at the same stage, consolidate or reposition.

Step 6. Prioritise like a true B2B marketer

This is where I see most teams going wrong. They prioritise by search volume because it is easy to sort in a spreadsheet. And it looks quite exciting, seeing the volume of all those relevant key terms… “ooh, look at the traffic we can get”.

Instead, prioritise using commercial relevance. Commercial relevance means how closely a keyword maps to revenue, buying decisions, or real sales conversations.

Use this filter:
• Does this map to a real sales question or objection?
• Is the intent aligned with how we sell?
• Can we realistically win this SERP based on what is ranking today?
• If we rank, does it help pipeline quality, sales velocity, or deal confidence?

A keyword can be high volume and still be a waste of time. A keyword can be low volume (especially comparing b2c with b2b) and still influences serious revenue. Your business likely has its niches and plenty of opportunity to own them.

Step 7. Define what success looks like

If you measure success only by rankings, you will optimise for the wrong outcomes.

In B2B marketing, good keyword research shows up as:
• Better quality inbound conversations
• Content being used by sales in live deals
• Fewer late stage objections because buyers are educated earlier
• Clearer alignment between marketing language and buyer language
• A topic footprint that grows, not random one off pages

Rankings are useful signals. They are not the goal.

Key buzzwords, translated

Here are those basic terms I threw around and what they mean in plain English:
• Keyword, the phrase someone searches
• Search intent, what they are trying to achieve
• SERP, what Google shows for that search
• SERP analysis, reading the SERP to validate intent and format
• Search volume, estimated demand, directional
• Keyword difficulty, estimated competition, directional
• Topic cluster, a structured set of pages around one topic
• Cannibalisation, your pages competing with each other
• Keyword gap, what competitors rank for that you do not
• Commercial relevance, whether the keyword connects to revenue reality

Call to action

If you are serious about making keyword research work in B2B, start with the fundamentals.

Write down the questions your buyers actually ask before they buy. Not keywords. Questions.

Then read your existing content honestly.

If it does not answer those questions clearly, no amount of optimisation will save it. And please don’t leave it to the person responsible for SEO…those b2b marketers with the most context must weigh in and help…and they must also not simply overrule the person responsible for SEO… team work makes the dream work.

Next, think in terms of commercial relevance, not just search volume. The best B2B marketing teams can answer questions like:

• Which keywords map to real sales conversations?
• Where does intent actually increase?
• Which terms help buyers make decisions, not just browse?
• How does our content support sales credibility?

If you want help turning this into a clear, prioritised keyword strategy that actually supports revenue, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

Jan 5, 2026

7 min read

an hipster SEO wizard

How to create a backlink strategy

Most people know that backlinks matter. Most B2B marketers have been told for years that they are a core SEO signal. The problem is that many backlink strategies are still built for a world of high volume traffic, short buying cycles and mass audiences.

That is not the world most B2B marketers operate in.

Our audiences are smaller. Buying cycles are longer. Credibility matters more than clicks. And sales are always part of the equation whether marketing likes it or not.

Which is why a B2B backlink strategy cannot just be a scaled down version of consumer SEO. It needs to be more deliberate, more selective and far more aligned to how trust is built in a category.

Stop treating backlinks as a tactic

The biggest mistake I see in B2B marketing is treating backlinks as an SEO task rather than a strategic signal.

Links should not be the goal. They should be the by product.

Search engines and AI systems no longer just count links. They interpret them. They look at context, relevance, intent and whether the linking content is actually useful to real people.

This is the thinking behind going beyond the backlink. A link only matters because of what it says about your credibility, not because it exists.

Once we accept that, the conversation changes from how do we get more links to why would anyone credible want to reference us at all.

Decide what you want to be trusted for

Before you build anything, be clear about what role backlinks are meant to play in your marketing strategy.

Are you trying to
• Be recognised as an authority in a specific niche
• Support a small number of high value service or product pages
• Build credibility in front of buyers before they ever speak to sales
• Reinforce your position with analysts, partners or industry bodies

If you cannot answer this, backlink activity becomes random. You have probably heard me mention random acts of marketing before. They may make us look busy, but they rarely deliver much commercial value.

It is fine for B2B backlink strategies to be opinionated. In fact, they should be. They reflect how the business wants to be perceived, not just what an SEO tool suggests.

Where backlink strategy actually sits in B2B marketing

In B2B, backlink strategy should not live in an SEO silo.

It sits at the intersection of
• Content marketing
• PR and communications
• Brand positioning
• Sales credibility

This is why the strongest B2B backlinks often come from industry publications, analyst commentary, research citations, association sites and trusted partners.

They take more effort to earn, but they provide value for years. And they do more than help rankings. They make sales conversations easier. They reduce perceived risk. They give prospective clients reassurance that you are a safe choice to consider.

What actually makes a backlink valuable in B2B

Not all backlinks are equal and this matters even more in B2B where volumes are lower.

A valuable B2B backlink usually
• Comes from a site your buyers already trust
• Is clearly relevant to your category or problem space
• Sits naturally within editorial content
• Has the potential to influence perception even if it never drives significant traffic

One link from a respected industry publication can do more for a B2B brand than fifty generic placements. Not just for SEO, but for credibility across the funnel.

Build link worthy content on purpose

If you want backlinks, your content has to earn them.

In B2B, that usually means
• Original research that gives others something to cite
• Clear explainers that simplify complex topics
• Strong points of view that help people frame decisions
• Practical frameworks that sales teams and buyers can actually use

Thin blogs written to keep a content calendar alive rarely earn links. Neither does content that tries to sound clever instead of useful. And content produced purely for scale, including a lot of low effort AI output, does not help either.

A simple test applies here. Would a credible industry voice reference this in their own work. If not, it will not attract meaningful backlinks.

Use digital PR as a growth lever, not a bolt on

Some of the strongest B2B backlinks today come from digital PR.

Journalists, editors and industry publishers are constantly looking for credible insight, data and commentary. When your content genuinely helps them do their job, they will link to your site.

This is where backlink strategy, brand building and authority start to overlap. You are not just earning links. You are shaping how your company is talked about in your market.

That is far more valuable than any directory listing. I despise those. What a nonsense.

What most B2B backlink strategies get wrong

This is where many teams fall down.

Most B2B backlink strategies fail because they
• Chase volume instead of relevance
• Optimise for SEO metrics instead of buyer trust
• Sit in an SEO silo disconnected from PR and brand
• Focus on links that do nothing to help sales conversations
• Look for quick wins instead of compounding credibility

Buying links or gaming placements might deliver short term movement, but it does not build anything durable and can cause headaches every time algorithms change, which is often.

Backlinks only work when they reflect real authority.

Measure impact, not activity

In B2B, the right questions are
• Are these links improving how buyers perceive us
• Are they supporting visibility around topics we care about
• Are sales teams using these sources to build credibility
• Are they contributing to long term authority in the category

A good backlink strategy improves confidence with humans as well as algorithms. If it does not do both, it is probably underperforming.

Call to action

If you only do five things this quarter, do these.

• Decide what you want to be known for
• Create one genuinely link worthy asset
• Focus on getting that asset cited in the right places
• Invest in learning so you understand what good looks like
• Talk to good SEO agencies, even if only to stay close to current thinking

That alone will outperform most scattergun backlink campaigns.

If you want help making this happen, feel free to get in touch and we will introduce you to agencies that genuinely know their stuff.

Jan 5, 2026

5 min read

A sign showing old seo and a man on a steam train, opposite a screen with AI future and an astronout

How to make your company appear in AI search results

This is now one of the most common questions I hear from b2b marketers.

Not: How do I rank on Google?

Not: What keywords should we target?

But: Why does ChatGPT mention them and not us?

So let me answer it properly. As it currently stands.

In short
To appear in AI search results your company needs:
• Content that answers real questions clearly
• A distinct point of view repeated consistently
• Visibility in places AI already trusts

Why AI search changes the rules

Ask a question in ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity or Claude and something fundamental has changed.

You are not shown ten options. You are given one assembled answer.

If your company is not part of that answer you effectively do not exist in that moment. And that moment is now how buyers, especially the younger generation, increasingly conduct their research.

This isn't a prediction. It is already happening.

How AI search actually works

AI powered search tools do not rank pages in the traditional sense.

  • They generate answers based on patterns they have learned over time. Those patterns come from

  • Content that clearly answers questions

  • Sources that are cited repeatedly

  • Language that shows up consistently

  • Brands that demonstrate authority

So the goal is no longer to rank number one for a keyword, it is be the brand AI trusts when answering a question

That is what appearing in AI search results actually means.

A simple way to think about it

SEO was about being found.
AEO is about being quoted.
GEO is about being remembered.

And this is the line I want most marketers to sit with.

If you want to appear in AI answers you need to stop writing like you want to rank and start writing like you want to be understood.

And that's quite a shift in mindset.

Does SEO still matter

Yes. But not in the way most teams are still practising it.

SEO still matters because AI systems learn from the same web your content lives on. If your site is technically broken or invisible to search engines you will struggle to be visible to AI too.

But SEO is no longer the finish line. It is the entry fee.

Ranking pages without answering questions clearly will not help you appear in AI search results. Optimising keywords without a point of view will not get you quoted. Publishing more content without clarity will not make you memorable.

Think of SEO as the foundation.
AEO is how you get used.
GEO is how you get chosen.

What AEO really means

AEO stands for Answer Engine Optimisation.

In practice it is simple. You are making it easy for AI to lift a clean accurate answer from your content without guessing.

  • Content that performs well in AI search usually has

  • Headings written as real questions

  • Direct answers in plain language

  • Clear definitions without fluff

  • Examples that remove ambiguity

If your content exists to sound impressive AI struggles to use it. If it exists to explain something clearly, AI is far more likely to reference it.

AEO is how your company gets mentioned correctly rather than vaguely or not at all.

What GEO actually does

GEO stands for Generative Engine Optimisation.

This is where long term visibility is won or lost.

AI models learn through repetition. When the same language and framing appears again and again across credible sources it becomes the default explanation.

Try this yourself. Ask ChatGPT something like: What is the best Marketing Automation software?

You will notice the same companies appear repeatedly. That is not luck. It is clarity plus consistency over time.

If ten average sites describe a category the same way AI repeats it. But if one brand consistently explains it better and shows up often enough AI learns from that instead.

GEO rewards:

  • Distinct language

  • Clear opinions

  • Repeatable ideas

  • Consistency

This is brand building for AI search whether you like the term or not.

Where AI tools actually get their information

Despite the mystique AI does not magically know things.

ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity rely heavily on:

  • Credible editorial content

  • Recognised industry publications

  • Expert commentary and interviews

  • Clear explainer pages

  • Frequently cited sources

This is why being visible in the right places matters again. Being quoted matters again. Having named expertise matters again.

A ghost written CEO post is not a strategy.

How to actually make your company appear in AI search results

Before you worry about tools or tactics answer these honestly.

• Can we explain what we do in one clear paragraph?
• Do we answer real buyer questions directly?
• Do we use the same language everywhere?
• Are we quoted anywhere that matters?

Then do the work properly.

Start with the questions you want to be known for answering.
Not keyword lists. Real uncomfortable buyer questions.

Create definitive pages:

  • What is this

  • How does it work

  • When should you use it

  • When should you not

As b2b marketers, we will have to write to explain and not to impress as AI prefers clarity over creativity.

Get quoted elsewhere: PR and expert commentary now directly influence AI visibility.

Repeat yourself deliberately: Same language. Same framing. Same beliefs expressed consistently.

That is how generative AI tools learn.

The uncomfortable truth

There is no hack or quick fix despite what some of those Tik Tok influencers may try and tell you.

No plugin. No checklist. No shortcut.

If your company does not have a clear point of view AI will not invent one for you.
If your content is vague AI will look elsewhere.
If your brand is forgettable AI will move to someone else.

If AI cannot explain your company clearly that is not an AI problem, it's a problem for us as B2B marketers.

Call to action

If you are serious about showing up in AI search results start with the fundamentals.

Write down the three questions you want your company to be known for answering. Then read your website and content honestly.

If it does not answer those questions clearly neither will an AI.

Next, think in terms of measurable visibility not just content output. The brands that win with AI search can answer questions like:

• How likely is it that AI models recommend our brand over competitors?
• Where are we currently cited or mentioned and where are the gaps?
• How AI tools describe us and with what sentiment?
• How we perform across major generative systems including OpenAI, Gemini and Meta?
• How we stack up against competitors when AI answers buyer questions?

These are the signals AI systems use when deciding which brands to surface and suggest.

If you want help turning achieving all this then feel free to get in touch and we'll personally introduce you to the agencies that know their stuff.


Jan 4, 2026

6 min read

CMO sitting at desk assessing briefs

How to avoid common mistakes when writing a marketing brief?

Over the last few decades in numerous CMO roles, I have written, received, rewritten and quietly apologised for more marketing briefs than I care to remember. I have also been on the other side of the fence, receiving briefs so poor they make me wonder if the sender should be issuing a brief to help them write a brief.

A good brief is about clarity. It exists to remove ambiguity, so the people you want to pay to solve your problems are on the same page as you and set up to succeed, in a way that you and your team actually benefit from.

In b2b marketing, most briefs start with a decision that has already been made. A campaign is needed to launch a new product. The team has decided it is finally time for marketing automation. It is time to refresh the brand identity. Somebody wants to jump on the account based marketing train. Completely normal.

The brief is not there to pretend you are starting from scratch. It is there to explain the thinking behind the decision, what you need and why, what resources you have to play with, and how you will know an agency is the right one for you. If a brief is too bad, the perfect agency might even decline to pitch in the first place, so shooting yourself in the foot.

Most bad marketing briefs are not written by bad marketers. They are written by busy people trying to move things along.

The problem is that small mistakes at the briefing stage snowball. What starts as vagueness turns into guesswork. Guesswork turns into key people being on different pages. This could lead to shoddy work. And that turns into frustration on all sides.

Like all things, everyone has their own opinion. But here are the most common mistakes I see in b2b marketing briefs.

Mistake 1. Treating the brief like admin

This is the big one. When a brief is treated as something you have to get done, rather than something that helps you think, it shows. The language is vague. The logic is loose. Key decisions are missing.

Sometimes I get the impression people think the brief is just admin that will be put right in the face to face briefing. It is not. The brief is the one truth. It is the moment you decide what you actually want and explain it clearly enough for someone else to help. If you rush it, you will pay for that later in time, money and goodwill.

Mistake 2. Pretending some decisions have not been made

Many briefs dance around reality. The business already wants a campaign. Or a new brand identity. Or outside help. Or a new direction. But the brief is written as if everything is still up for debate.

This creates confusion immediately. Agencies do not know whether they are being asked to diagnose a problem or execute a solution. Be honest. If a decision has been made, state it clearly. You have 100% decided to use Sitecore over WordPress? Say so.

Clarity is not limiting. It is invaluable.

Mistake 3. Being vague about the problem

Briefs often describe what needs to be done without explaining why. We need more awareness. We need better leads. We need to stand out. None of this helps.

What is actually not working as it should. Where are things breaking down. What prompted this brief now. Without that context, people are forced to guess at the real problem and the work will drift.

Why not help agencies by giving them valuable context upfront. Do not rely on them asking the right questions. Give them the lowdown. Give them the inside track. Proactively.

Mistake 4. Asking the work to do too many things

If your brief has ten objectives, it has none. One brief should have one main job. You can include secondary goals, but you need to be clear about what matters most and what trumps everything else if time or resources get tight.

When everything is a priority, nothing is. This is how work ends up watered down and compromised. Focus is not a nice to have. It is what makes work effective.

Mistake 5. Defining success with buzzwords

Success is often described in language that sounds impressive but means very little. And as b2b marketing people, we can be the worst offenders. Best in class. Cutting edge. Market leading. These phrases do not give anyone something to aim for.

Describe success in plain English. What needs to happen for you to know this project has been successful. What about from your stakeholders’ perspective.

Ideally the metrics are quantifiable. At a minimum, they should be SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound. If you cannot explain success clearly, you will struggle to recognise it when it happens, praise those who delivered it, or hold people and agencies accountable if it did not.

Mistake 6. Rubbish personas

Everyone is not a target audience. And neither is a rubbish persona.

I am generally alarmed at how bad b2b marketing people are at personas. I have seen personas cross my desk with entirely useless traits, like they have three kids, like skiing, reading books and eating Mars bars. That is a real example. It serves no purpose. It fools nobody. More importantly, it adds nothing to the brief or the outcome.

An agency will never know your customers as well as you do. Good personas help them make better decisions on your behalf. Focus on what matters. What job titles buy your services. What pressures are they under. What does success look like for them. What do they fear. What do they need to believe to choose you. What tools and processes do they live in. That is the sort of thing I want to see, not where they go on holiday.

Mistake 7. Listing features instead of benefits

Much like personas, b2b marketers people also struggle with value propositions.

Listing features, locations, or how many employees you have is not a value proposition. The best briefs articulate why prospective clients would be interested in your service and why. How will you help them be more successful. What challenges do you solve and how. What does that mean for them as a business and as an individual. Why should they choose you rather than a competitor.

Mistake 8. Hiding constraints until later

Budget, timelines, legal requirements, internal politics, technical limits. These things exist whether you write them down or not. Leaving them out of the brief does not make the work more creative. It just pushes the problem down the road.

Hiding the budget is often framed as being savvy. It rarely is. It just forces people to guess, then compromise decent ideas later when the budget inevitably comes out. That helps no one.

If you cannot share an exact budget, give a range. If you cannot talk about the politics, at least describe the internal perception you will need to overcome. If legal is normally extremely risk averse, flag it early. Give agencies a chance of charting a course through the maze.

Agencies can work within constraints. What they cannot do is plan around information they do not have. Put the reality on the table early. And yes, there are always ways to say the sensitive stuff without spelling it out. Come on. You are marketers. Be creative.

Mistake 9. Being unclear about what is fixed and what is flexible

Many briefs leave agencies guessing about where they can challenge you and where they cannot. Is the message locked. Is the channel fixed. Is the timeline immovable.

If everything feels fixed, you will get safe work. If nothing feels fixed, you will get confusion. A good brief separates non negotiables from areas where thinking is welcome.

Mistake 10. Forgetting to say how you will choose

If this is a pitch, one of the biggest mistakes is not explaining how decisions will be made. What matters most. Thinking or polish. Experience or fresh perspective. Chemistry or credentials. Who is involved.

When you do not say this, agencies pitch to whatever they think you secretly want. That rarely ends well. Being clear about how you will choose is basic fairness and improves the quality of responses dramatically.

Mistake 11. Not giving all agencies the same information

I have been a stakeholder in pitches where some agencies were given more information than others. I always call it out. It is not fair and it skews the outcome.

I once had a head of procurement ask me to answer a question from one agency during an RFP process. I was happy to do it, but only if the question and answer were shared with all bidding agencies. They pushed back and said the other agencies should ask better questions if they wanted the extra context.

I reject that thinking. The agency asking good questions is great but my team want the best outcome and we do not have time to play games. Share the information and get to a better result faster.

Mistake 12. Sending the brief and hoping for the best

A brief is not finished when you send the document. Writing it and briefing it are not the same thing. If you do not talk it through, answer questions and confirm shared understanding, you are leaving too much to chance.

Send the brief. Talk them through it. Be prepared to refine it. If you just email a brief, it is a waste of time. You will not get anyone’s best people or best thinking aligned to the brief. And from an agency point of view, I would not want to bid on anything for someone I have not had a conversation with. The best agencies will push back on this. That is one of the ways you spot them.

Mistake 13. Not considering compensating bidders for their time

This may be controversial and not every budget allows it, but I have compensated losing bidders for their time, even if it is a small but meaningful gesture.

Agencies spend real time and expertise responding to your brief. Creative agencies incur real costs. If your budget allows, recognise that. Even if you went in a different direction, you valued their thinking and it helped you get to the right decision. A simple gesture can leave the door open to work together in future, and it is the decent thing to do.

The simple rule that avoids most mistakes

If there is one rule I stick to, it is this. A good marketing brief should make it obvious what is being bought, why it exists, who it is for, what success looks like and how the work will be judged. If any of those are unclear, the brief is not ready yet.

Most briefing mistakes come from rushing, avoiding decisions, and treating the whole thing like an administrative task. Slow down. Decide properly. Write it clearly. It is one of the highest ROI things you can do in b2b marketing.

 

Dec 30, 2025

9 min read

Previous
Next
woman screaming at journalist until shes blue in the face

How to use PR to build credibility in B2B

In my experience, most PR underperforms for one simple reason. It is built to generate coverage, not influence.

Press releases go out. Coverage appears. Logos get dropped into decks. Somewhere along the way, teams convince themselves that visibility equals impact.

It does not.

In complex B2B buying, nobody buys because they saw your logo in the trade press. They buy because choosing you feels safe, defensible, and sensible to the people who have to put their names against the decision.

PR only works when it reduces risk. When it does not, it becomes noise.

What PR is actually for in B2B

PR is not about announcements or press releases (I am not even sure journalists read them anymore). It is not about share of voice. It is not about chasing journalists for coverage.

In our world, PR exists to build external credibility that buyers can borrow internally.

When a deal is live, buying group members are quietly asking themselves variations of:

  • Are these people legitimate?

  • Do they understand our world?

  • Have others trusted them before?

  • Would I look foolish defending this choice internally?

This aligns closely with buying group research from Gartner, which shows that deals stall far more often due to lack of confidence and consensus than lack of information. PR contributes to what Gartner calls sense making. It helps groups align around whether a decision feels safe.

So from that viewpoint, PR is another tool in the arsenal that helps do that job.

PR is not the same as media relations

One reason PR disappoints is because it is often reduced to media relations alone.

It actually includes:

  • Media commentary

  • Executive visibility

  • Analyst relations

  • Third party validation

  • Consistent narrative across external touchpoints

  • Media coverage is just one output. Credibility is the outcome.

You can get plenty of coverage and still be ignored in deals if what you say sounds generic, inconsistent, or self-congratulatory.

Why most B2B PR fails

Most B2B PR fails in predictable ways.

  • It sounds like marketing

  • It talks about the company, not the problem

  • It overclaims and underexplains

  • It avoids trade-offs and reality

  • It focuses on announcements that only matter to that firm, rather than insight for anybody else

This is why buyers skim it or ignore it entirely. They are not looking for promotion. They are looking for reassurance.

Research from the Edelman Trust Barometer consistently shows that people trust expertise, transparency, and third-party validation far more than corporate messaging. PR that feels polished but empty actively erodes trust.

What is actually newsworthy in B2B

Most B2B companies are not newsworthy because they exist. They become newsworthy when they help others make sense of change.

What journalists and buyers actually care about:

  • What is changing in the market?

  • What is breaking or no longer working?

  • What leaders are seeing that others are missing?

  • What trade-offs organizations are facing?

  • What mistakes are being repeated?

This is why commentary outperforms announcements. Insight travels further than information.

If your PR plan is built around what you want to say rather than what your market is struggling to understand, it will not perform. It simply adds to the plethora of noise that is already out there.

Credibility is built through consistency, not volume

Buyers do not remember one article. They remember patterns.

This is where mental availability matters. Research from the B2B Institute shows that brands grow by being consistently associated with specific problems and outcomes over time.

Effective PR reinforces the same story across:

  • Executive interviews

  • Bylined articles

  • Panel appearances

  • Analyst commentary

  • Partner quotes

If each appearance tells a slightly different version of who you are, or if different executives say conflicting things, you are not building credibility, you are creating friction.

Reality check
If your CEO sounds visionary, your CTO sounds tactical, your PR agency sounds promotional, and your sales team sounds defensive, buyers will trust none of them.

How PR actually supports live deals

PR will never close deals directly, of course, but bad PR can lose it.

It can make sales conversations easier.

Good PR helps when:

  • Prospects already recognize your name

  • Stakeholders reference your perspective unprompted

  • Objections sound familiar rather than hostile

  • Sales spends less time proving legitimacy

This aligns with Forrester guidance on executive thought leadership, which emphasizes that credibility shortens evaluation cycles by reducing perceived risk.

PR works best when sales does not have to explain it.

How to tell if your PR is building credibility

If you want a simple diagnostic, ask these questions:

  • Would a journalist describe us as experts in one specific thing?

  • Do our leaders sound consistent across interviews?

  • Does sales ever forward this coverage without being asked?

  • Would a cautious buyer feel safer after reading this?

If the answer is no, the issue is not distribution it is a lack of substance.

How to measure PR without pretending attribution

PR does not lend itself to last click attribution and pretending otherwise damages its credibility internally.

Avoid over relying on:

  • Raw coverage volume

  • Share of voice without context

  • Generic sentiment scores

  • Last click revenue models

Instead, look for signals that confidence is forming:

  • Sales referencing coverage in meetings

  • Increased inbound credibility rather than inbound volume

  • Faster movement through late-stage objections

  • Analyst inclusion and citation

  • Executives being sought out for perspective

PR should be discussed in the language of influence, not performance marketing.

The simple rule to remember

PR in B2B is not about being visible. It is about being believable.

If your PR helps buyers feel safer choosing you and helps sales spend less time proving legitimacy, it is working. If it just fills a coverage report, it is not. Especially if you don’t actually recognise the publications who picked up your press release verbatim.

Call to action

Audit your last six months of PR and ask one hard question.

If a cautious buyer read this, would they feel more confident choosing us?

If the answer is unclear, stop producing more content and fix the narrative first.

  • Decide what you want to be trusted for.

  • Ensure your leaders sound consistent.

  • Prioritize insight over announcements.

  • Measure confidence, not clicks.

If you want help turning PR into a credibility engine rather than a coverage machine, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

How to avoid catching Social Influenza

The lyrics of "Social Influenza" paint a dystopian picture of our modern condition: a feverish need for validation, a contagion of comparison, and the exhausting static of a life lived for the feed. The song warns of a sickness where we develop a craving for performance theater and an addiction to meaningless likes and comments.

For B2B marketers, LinkedIn is Ground Zero for this outbreak.

We are under constant pressure to optimize, to influence, and to "add value" until we are empty. The pressure to be a "Top Voice" can quickly mutate into a professional illness. This is the Social Influenza.

It starts with a slight fever of anxiety when you haven't posted in 24 hours and ends with full-blown Corporate Dysmorphia: the sickening gap between the human you are and the polished, hustle-culture avatar sufferers feel they need to present online.

If you find yourself posting "inspirational" stories about your morning coffee or using the phrase "delighted to announce" with a sinking feeling in your stomach, you may already be infected. If you want to survive the platform without losing your soul, you need to understand the pathology of the disease.

Here is your chart for diagnosis, treatment, and recovery.

Part I: The Pathology

The virus mutates quickly. In the B2B ward, we are currently seeing seven distinct variants of the influenza. You must learn to spot them in your feed, and, more importantly, in your own drafts.

Strain 1: The "Hustle Fever"

  • The Symptom: This is the inability to rest. You feel a burning compulsion to post seven days a week because "the algorithm demands consistency." You start measuring your self-worth by impression metrics rather than actual business conversations. You are burning up, generating heat but no light.

  • The Cure: Treat LinkedIn like a potent antibiotic, not a daily buffet. One or two insightful posts a week will always outperform seven days of empty noise. Your goal is resonance, not volume.

Strain 2: Buzzword Delirium

  • The Symptom: The virus attacks the language centers of the brain. You lose the ability to speak like a human. Suddenly, you aren't "solving problems"; you are "leveraging synergistic paradigms to unlock granular value adds." You are writing to sound smart, which inevitably makes you sound infected.

  • The Cure: Read your draft post out loud. If you wouldn't say those exact words to a friend at a bar (or a colleague over coffee) without getting laughed at, delete them. Write for humans, not for the "thought leader" persona.

Strain 3: The "Bro-etry" Spasms

  • The Symptom: This respiratory issue forces the writer to speak in short. Staccato. Sentences. You find yourself physically unable to write a paragraph. You break every sentence into its own line to "stop the scroll." You start posts with dramatic hooks like "I almost lost everything..." only to pivot into a banal tip about email open rates.

  • The Cure: Respect the Paragraph. Trust that your audience is intelligent enough to read three sentences grouped together. If your insight is actually valuable, you don't need to dress it up in the costume of a dramatic revelation.

Strain 4: Engagement Bait Nausea

  • The Symptom: You post polarizing or overly personal content solely to trigger the dopamine hit of the "comments" section. You ask questions you don't care about ("Agree?") just to boost the numbers. You feel a sinking sensation in your stomach because you know you are prioritizing the algorithm over your integrity.

  • The Cure: Intentionality. Before every post, ask: Does this actually help my prospect, or does it just feed my ego?If the answer is ego, keep it in the drafts. It is actually a very impressive trait to be able to talk yourself back from the ledge; it is not wasted time.

Strain 5: The "Tag-You’re-It" Rash

  • The Symptom: A highly contagious strain where the infected attempts to force the virus onto others. You finish a mediocre post and tag 30 people in the comments with the caption "Thoughts?" These people have no relation to the topic, but you need their "clout" to simulate a fever of engagement.

  • The Cure: Only tag someone if you are specifically quoting them or if you have a pre-existing relationship where they expect to be brought into the conversation. Do not sneeze on strangers to get their attention.

Strain 6: The "ChatGPT" Pallor

  • The Symptom: The infection takes over the brain completely, replacing independent thought with a gray, lifeless simulation. You stare at someone else’s post and realize you have nothing to say, so you generate a comment: "Great insights, [Name]! Synergy is indeed key." You become part of the perfect breeding ground for the virus to multiply and mutate.

  • The Cure: If you can't write a 50-word comment yourself, write a 5-word comment that is actually true. "This specific point resonates because" carries more weight than three paragraphs of AI slop.

Strain 7: Toxic Positivity Paralysis

  • The Symptom: The most dangerous strain, characterized by the inability to experience a human emotion without calculating its ROI. You suffer a personal tragedy, but before you can even process the grief, you are already mentally drafting the LinkedIn post about "resilience." You see your own life not as an experience to be lived, but as raw material to be mined for "lessons." You have become a content parasite on your own soul.

  • The Cure: Reclaim your humanity by refusing to monetize your suffering. Sometimes, a bad quarter is just a bad quarter, not a "failing forward" masterclass. Silence is an immune booster. It allows you to heal offline so you can return online as a person, not a carcass of content.

Strain 8: Circadian Grindset Syndrome

  • The Symptom: You jolt awake at 3:45 AM, cortisol spiking, convinced that if you sleep until 7:00 AM, you have already "lost" the day to your competitors. You drag yourself to the gym not for health, but to take a blurry photo of the squat rack or your watch face with the caption "Rise and Grind." You are sleep-deprived, hallucinating success, and mistaking exhaustion for dedication.

  • The Cure: High performance requires recovery, not deprivation. Unless you are training for the Olympics or operating a dairy farm, you do not need to be up at 4:00 AM. Sleep is a productivity tool. Your net worth is not tied to your alarm clock settings.

Part II: Building Immunity

The song lyrics speak to the desire to "escape" or "shut down." You likely cannot delete LinkedIn if it is your livelihood, but you can build a Hazmat suit to wear while you work.

1. Create a "Quarantine Zone" Social Influenza spreads when you let the platform dictate your schedule.

  • The Protocol: Turn off all LinkedIn notifications on your phone. All of them. Check the platform only during designated "work windows" (e.g., 9:00 AM to 9:30 AM). Do not let the virus follow you home to the dinner table.

2. Vaccinate with Reality The virus thrives on perfection. It dies in the face of reality.

  • The Protocol: Post about a failure. Not a "humble brag" failure (e.g., "I worked too hard and my team loved me for it"), but a real lesson learned from a mistake. Vulnerability is the antibody to the fake perfection of social influenza.

3. Mute the Super-Spreaders If a specific "influencer" makes you feel inadequate, annoyed, or tired, realize they are contagious.

  • The Protocol: Use the Mute button liberally. It is our best defense. You cannot heal in a toxic environment.

Part III: The Prognosis

To recover from the Social Influenza, you must remember the core sentiment of the song: You are not your feed.

In B2B, the most effective marketers are not the ones who have "gone viral" with a fever-dream of hashtags. They are the ones who remain healthy, grounded, and undeniably human.

The Final Prescription:

  • Stop "Networking," Start "Connecting": The influenza makes us view people as numbers (leads, likes, followers). Recover by viewing them as peers.

  • Check Your Pulse: Before you hit "Post," check your physical reaction. Do you cringe at the thought of posting it? If so, you are symptomatic.

  • Discharge: Close the tab. Go outside. Touch grass.

The static will always be there. You don't have to tune into it.

Listen to Social Influenza on the Marketing Mixtape

man at a crossroads

How to pick the right ABM accounts

Before you begin your ABM programme your foundations (account selection) has to be right. Many ABM programmes don’t fail because the tactics are wrong, it’s more fundamental than that, if your account selection is wishful rather than calculated, you are starting on the wrong foot. 

A big logo gets picked, everyone rallies, content gets built, outreach starts then you find out the buying path is opaque, there isn’t enough repeatable work and nobody can confidently explain why this account is worth the effort right now.

ABM is not a quick fix to revenue and profit, it requires commitment and consistent time investment across research, outreach, content, relationship-building, and internal coordination. Without a consistent way to choose accounts, ABM can become a mix of activity noise and hope which is the worst thing for pipeline and speed to revenue and client-stickiness.

This article outlines a straightforward scoring method that I have used in the past to identify the accounts most likely to succeed in an ABM programme, based on recurring/upsell/cross-sell revenue potential, speed to value, and realistic expansion runway. It’s designed to be quick enough to use in the real world, even with limited resources and consistent enough to avoid internal debate.

Before you start: define your revenue goals 

Before you score anything, you need to be clear on what “success” looks like commercially to avoid scoring accounts in isolation which can lead teams to chase numbers that don’t connect to a specific outcome.

A revenue forecast is simply the result you’re trying to produce and the kind of work you need to produce it. For example, you might decide your ABM programme is meant to prioritise accounts that can reach £10k MRR within 12 months, with a credible path to £20k MRR without requiring significant additional internal investment.

ABM is a focused investment, if your programme is built to generate recurring revenue for example, your account selection needs to reflect recurring revenue realities: repeatable work, reliable buying paths, urgency, and expansion potential.

Step 1: Choose a simple but solid scoring model 

If your scoring process is complex it will confuse and if it’s too vague it can lead to gaming. You are aiming for something that can be done quickly, creates consistency, and stays connected to commercial outcomes.

A practical model is a 0 - 20 total score made up of five components:

  • Volume or Cross-sell/Upsell Potential (0 - 5)

  • Budget Access + Decision Path Strength (0 - 4)

  • Urgency / Timing (0 - 4)

  • Trigger-Offer Fit (0 - 4)

  • Expansion Runway (0 - 3)

The weighting is intentional - volume/cross-sell/upsell potential gets the most value because recurring or cross-sell/upsell revenue relies on recurring or new product/ service/jurisdiction work. The other factors determine whether you can land, deliver fast enough, and expand without friction.

Think of the total score as a quick “is this account realistically capable of hitting our ICP revenue profile?” It’s not perfect but much more effective than choosing accounts based on brand recognition and sentiment.

Step 2: Gather enough signals to score 

When teams hear “account scoring,” they often assume it means deep research and analysis paralysis. It doesn’t, you only need enough signal to make a smart first-pass decision, and then you improve the score as you learn more.

This is where the evidence score provides a simple way to track how strong your proof is.

At the first pass, you’re usually working with public signals, things you can see quickly and consistently. LinkedIn can tell you team size and structure. Job posts can hint at upcoming initiatives, pain, and maturity. Annual reports and press releases can reveal growth activity, transformation programmes, acquisitions, regulatory exposure, and operational complexity.

Then you’ve got network intel, which is often the best predictor of whether you’ll get traction. A credible internal contact, a warm intro route, prior panel status, or past work can dramatically change the probability of success sometimes more than the account’s “fit” on paper.

Finally, there’s discovery confirmation where you turn assumptions into facts, from which you can confidently make a decision. 

The key is to keep the first pass light. Score quickly based on what you know, then use the score to decide what you need to validate next.

Step 3: Score the five components (without overthinking)

Volume/Cross-sell/Upsell Potential (0 - 5)

Start with the most important question: is there likely to be enough repeatable/new work to justify recurring revenue or enough upsell/cross-sell opportunity?

A low score here usually means the work is sporadic, ad hoc, and unpredictable. Even if the company is large, that doesn’t automatically mean volume/opportunity in the area you sell. A mid-range score often suggests a few teams with steady needs, or moderate complexity spread across regions. A high score indicates environments with ongoing operational churn: regulated industries, data-heavy organisations, multi-entity structures, many vendors, procurement involvement, and the kind of compliance pressure that keeps work flowing.

If you’re aiming for something like £10k MRR or an average revenue per entity increase, this helps you sanity-check the idea of recurring or upsell/cross-sell work - can this account generate enough steady demand rather than isolated one-offs?

Budget Access + Decision Path Strength (0 - 4)

Next, look at how realistically you can get decisions made.

A low score means you don’t know who decides, procurement is unknown, and you have no route in to the people who can approve spend. A mid score suggests you have a route to stakeholders, and you can start to map the buying path even if it’s not fully clear. A high score means you can identify the decision owner/s, you understand the procurement route, and you have a credible way in through a warm intro, panel status, or existing relationship.

This factor matters because ABM without decision-path clarity can produce lots of “activity” without moving the opportunity forward.

Urgency / Timing (0 - 4)

Ask: is there a reason to act now?

ABM needs accounts that have momentum triggers and real pressure. Low urgency is steady-state- no deadlines, no pain, no reason to allocate budget as there is no clear challenge. Medium urgency suggests some triggers: maybe hiring, a new initiative, or mild dissatisfaction. High urgency usually shows up when there’s a time-bound driver such as M&A, restructuring, a transformation programme, regulatory change or commercial/competitor friction.

Trigger-Offer Fit (0 - 4)

Now ask how well your offer connects to a pain you can fix quickly.

If the fit is vague, you’ll struggle to get messaging right and fall back on generic content, and the account will stay “interested” without moving. A mid score suggests there’s a clear problem you can solve and a plausible early win. A top score means your offer maps clearly to their operational language, and you can describe outcomes in terms they actually care about.

You want to be able to create an offer that gets a foot in the door, proves value fast, and creates internal momentum.

Expansion Runway (0 - 3)

Finally, consider whether there’s room to grow beyond the initial scope.

A low score implies a narrow team or single use case. You can still win, but the growth opportunity beyond that is low. A medium score suggests multiple stakeholders, regions, or adjacent product types. A top score indicates multiple business units, repeatable or new work types and an ongoing need where expansion is a logical next step rather than a brand-new sale each time.

Step 4: Keeping your scorecard “honest”

First, assign an Evidence Level to the account. Keep it simple: Level 1 is based on public information, Level 2 includes credible network intel or relationship proof, and Level 3 is validated through discovery.

Second, assign Confidence (High/Medium/Low). High confidence means you’ve validated key assumptions in conversation and you can see a path to spend. Medium confidence means you have strong public signals and a decent route in. Low confidence means you’re mostly guessing.

These two fields stop the most common scoring hurdle, which is treating an optimistic first-pass score as if it’s truth. A high score with low confidence is not “wrong.” It’s simply a signal that you need further validation before you invest heavily.

Step 5: Can you service if you win it? (uncomfortable but important!)

ABM account selection is also about your ability to execute.

A perfect Tier 1 account becomes a poor ABM choice if you don’t have the people, time, or delivery bandwidth to follow through. After scoring, do a quick capacity review. Ask how many high-touch accounts you can genuinely service this quarter without lowering quality. Ask who owns the core motions: research, messaging, content, outreach, follow-up, sales enablement, and delivery coordination.

If naming owners is a challenge, you may not have capacity and need to be realistic in your approach. A wise colleague once told me - undersell and over deliver, don’t oversell and under-deliver, a strategy Apple follows coincidently!

Step 6: Use the score to tier accounts into ABM strength

The point of scoring is to determine how much ABM effort an account deserves - strategic (1:1), scale (1:few) or programmatic (1:many).

A practical approach is to map accounts into tiers. High-scoring accounts with stronger evidence and confidence are candidates for 1:1 ABM. Mid-range accounts often suit 1:few clusters where you can share a core play and personalise around specific triggers and roles. Lower-scoring accounts might still be relevant, but they belong in 1:many campaigns or a lighter engagement approach.

This helps by protecting you from applying Tier 1 effort to too many accounts and then wondering why everything feels hard.

Step 7: Re-score after discovery (scores are designed to evolve)

TA scorecard is not a once-and-done exercise. It’s a living number, and its job is to improve.

After your first meaningful discovery call, revisit the score. This is often where the biggest shifts happen: volume assumptions get corrected, decision paths become clearer (or more complicated), urgency becomes real (or not!), and trigger-offer fit either sharpens or turns out to be misaligned.

A simple cadence works well: first-pass score before outreach, second score after first discovery, third score after procurement and scope are clearer. No need to over-engineer, just keep it reflective of current status.

Step 8: Calibrate scoring so it stays consistent

If you have more than one person scoring accounts, you’ll see variance which is to be expected as relationships ands opinions from different view points vary which is why shared interpretation becomes important.

The easiest solution is a short calibration call to compare scores, and agree what a “4” really means in your context. From the start you should document definitions to reduce debate and increase consistency.

Step 9: Use the scorecard to make decisions

Your scorecard should sit in (or behind) your CRM with the current ABM score surfaced at the Account or ABM intelligence tab level. 

It should be used to decide which accounts enter ABM now, what tier they sit in, what needs to be validated next, and what the next action is. If an account has a strong score but weak evidence, your next action is not  to build content it should be to validate the assumptions quickly. If an account has a solid score and strong confidence, your next action is to mobilise and move via your designed outbound/inbound tactics.

For most businesses, ABM success comes from less is more - fewer accounts and clearer actions with tighter execution leading to better conversion.

For a practical way to pick the right clients for your ABM programme, download our ABM Account Scoring template 

We’ve built a practical ABM Account Scoring Scorecard template based on the five factors described and including Evidence Level and Confidence fields. It’s designed to help you prioritise accounts based on commercial reality and team capacity - so your ABM programme is focused, winnable, and repeatable. Let us know if you'd like an introduction to ABM agencies that we'd recommend.

Sketch of woman looking irritated

How to choose the right CRM?

If you’ve ever inherited a CRM, in all likelihood you’ll know this uncomfortable feeling: users avoid it, reporting can’t be trusted, and the client experience suffers in ways that are difficult to pinpoint but very easy to feel. 

Choosing a CRM is a critical operating model decision affecting all functions of a business. Done well, it becomes the backbone of predictable growth and consistent client handling. Done badly, it becomes an expensive habit you keep feeding because switching feels worse than suffering.

This article is a step-by-step guide to choosing a CRM with commercial outcomes and client experience front and centre. 

Step 1: Start with how your business actually wins revenue

Before you sit through demos or compare feature lists from shortlisted vendors, draft what you’re trying to enable commercially. A CRM will amplify whatever is already true about your go-to-market. If you don’t start with a clear strategy, the system becomes a mirror of that ambiguity and the team will improvise their way around it.

Begin with your ideal client profile and your revenue process. Who are you trying to win and keep? How do deals typically start - through inbound, outbound, referrals, partners, account expansion, events, or a mix? How long do they take? Who needs to be involved? What do you need to know early in the cycle to qualify properly to avoid building a vapourware pipeline full of hope and guesswork and a contact list of ghosts?

It helps to write a simple “CRM purpose statement” (including resource reality) in plain English. For example: “We need a system that helps us respond quickly to inbound interest, run structured follow-up, manage opportunities consistently across a small team, and give leadership forecasting they can trust.” This statement is a grounding filter when a vendor starts showing you all the fancy extras, which can be very distracting in the era of AI enablement. 

Step 2: Map the client journey, not just your pipeline

A lot of CRM decisions get caught inside the sales pipeline. Pipeline matters, but it’s only one part of the client experience. The real question to ask is whether the CRM supports the full journey from first touch to expansion/renewal and advocacy, and whether it helps your commercial team present as organised and consistent throughout the buyer experience.

Think through the stages your clients’ buyer experience: anonymous interest, known lead, qualification, proposal, verbal committment, contracting, onboarding, delivery, upsell and cross-sell. For each stage, ask what a good experience looks like for the client and what has to happen behind the scenes to make that experience smooth. Where do leads and deals get stuck today? Where do handoffs break? Where do clients have to repeat themselves because internal context gets lost between teams?

When you map the journey this way, it becomes easier to see what should live inside the CRM, who owns what part and what should sit alongside it. You also stop designing around internal departmental lines and start designing around the client’s reality, which is usually where the commercial gains live.

Step 3: Decide how the CRM fits into your wider tech stack

Your CRM is never standalone, it will sit between your website, your marketing channels, your email and calendar, your proposal and contracting tools, your invoicing, your support or customer success workflows, and your reporting. The mistake many teams make is treating the CRM as a walled-garden, then being surprised when the “integrations later” plan turns into a long-running painful saga.

At this stage, draft a basic workflow view of your stack and ask what needs to be the single source of truth for accounts and contacts. Decide how leads will enter the system, where consent will be captured, how attribution will be handled, and what will be used for reporting and what data passports into finance and operations systems. It’s also worth being honest about your integration appetite. Every integration is a mini-product you now own. Someone has to maintain it, troubleshoot it, and notice when it silently breaks.

This is where you should also consider whether you want an in-suite approach or a best-of-breed approach. Suites can reduce integration complexity, but they can also push you into paying for modules you weren’t planning to buy. Best-of-breed stacks can be powerful, but they demand dedicated specialist operational ownership and discipline. Neither is inherently “right.” The right choice is the one your team can actually manage without the system degrading over time.

Step 4: Take your data seriously before you move anything

If your current data is messy, migrating it won’t magically clean it, in 99% of cases it will multiply and formalise the mess as CRMs can create the illusion of order while storing poor data in structured fields.

Before you migrate, run a practical data quality check. How many duplicates do you have? Are companies and contacts up to date, what fields have gaps and are they critical for segmentation? Are job titles reliable? Do you have consistent lead source values, or is it a creative-writing exercise? Can you tell where leads come from and whether they convert? And importantly, do you have consent captured properly, with enough detail to be confident you’re GDPR compliant?

Data cleaning and enrichment should happen before migration wherever possible. Deduplicate. Standardise key fields like industry, lifecycle stage, region, lead source. Decide what’s worth migrating and what should be archived. Migrating everything “just in case” is fatal, do the hard yards first, users and your bottom line will thank you later. You want the system to feel useful on day one and that means removing noise, not importing it.

Step 5: Design for real user behaviour (not wishful user behaviour)

Most CRM problems are user behaviour problems disguised as technology problems. If it’s hard to use, people won’t use it. If it feels like admin, they’ll avoid it. If it doesn’t help them sell or serve clients, it will become something they update when they’re told off.

Decide what you need users to do, and keep it grounded in reality. Sales teams need to be able to capture activity quickly, keep opportunities moving, and know what to do next without the CRM becoming another layer of friction. Marketing needs clean segmentation, reporting and reliable handoffs. Leadership needs always-on forecasting they can believe, and visibility into bottlenecks that doesn’t rely on someone building a fresh spreadsheet every single time, where a minor deviation in report building creates a different number for the same thing, leading to mistrust.

This is also where you choose your “non-negotiables” for adoption. If follow-up tasks aren’t created consistently today, you’ll want automation. If leads aren’t contacted quickly enough, you’ll want routing rules and alerts. If forecasting is opaque, you’ll want clear stage definitions and hygiene checks. The best CRM is the one that makes the right behaviours the easiest behaviours.

Step 6: Draft requirements as commercial outcomes vs feature lists

It’s tempting to write requirements like a shopping list: “custom objects,” “advanced reporting,” “workflows,” “AI.” A more effective approach is to express requirements in plain English terms of what the system needs to make possible.

For example, “We need to route inbound leads to the right person automatically based on territory and product line, and we need to see response time”, or “We need campaign reporting that helps us decide where to invest marketing time and money, even if it’s not perfect attribution.”

Once you have requirements phrased commercially, you can prioritise them better. Some capabilities are essential on day one, some matter later, and some can be handled by another tool in the stack. When everything is treated as equally important, nothing becomes important and you tend to overbuy and overwhelm.

Step 7: Pressure-test pricing like you’re buying a house!

This is where many CRM selections go off the rails: teams compare entry-level pricing, feel relieved, and then discover that the features they assumed were “standard” are locked behind higher tiers or separate modules.

You want to understand exactly which tier includes the capabilities that matter to your plan. Lead routing and assignment rules are a common one. Workflow automation is another. Reporting depth, forecasting tools, campaign tracking, and even basic permissions can be licence-gated depending on the vendor. Some systems also restrict things like the number of workflows, contacts, reports, API calls, or custom objects, which feels fine until you start scaling and then suddenly hits you with an ugly surprise bill.

There’s also the module trap. A vendor may position the CRM as one product, but for the setup you need, you may end up buying marketing automation, integration apps (eg into your finance application), or reporting add-ons earlier than you expected. That isn’t necessarily bad, but it should be an intentional decision with a two-year cost view, not something you discover after implementation that becomes an unforseen budget bunker-buster.

If you take one thing from this section, let it be this: build a simple two-year total cost of ownership model. Include licences, implementation, integrations, storage, enrichment tools, and the internal time and human resources required to run it. The cheapest option on month one is never the cheapest option by month eighteen.

Step 8: Look for flexibility early

Your business will change. You’ll refine your ICP, adjust your products, enter a new region, or add a partner channel and your CRM needs to move with you without becoming fragile.

Evaluate flexibility through specific scenarios. Ask how easy it is to update pipeline stages without breaking reporting, how segmentation changes are handled, what it takes to support account hierarchies if you move into enterprise. Ask how routing rules evolve as you add territories or product lines. Pay attention to whether customization is clean and governable, or whether it encourages every team to create their own fields and definitions until reporting becomes meaningless (a personal “bette noir”!).

Flexibility is useful when it supports evolution but can quickly becomes dangerous when it allows freedom of inconsistency at scale.

Step 9: Treat AI as an enablement layer that depends on your foundations

AI features in CRM platforms can be genuinely valuable. They can reduce admin through enrichment, suggest next actions, help with forecasting signals, improve data quality, and speed up content creation for emails and follow-ups. When they’re implemented well, they can genuinely benefit productivity and consistency.

AI also has dependencies, yes, pesky data hygiene, again! If your underlying data is inconsistent, AI outputs become unreliable. If activity is not logged consistently, AI insights will be incomplete. As AI often touches communication and customer data, you should check privacy and storage terms carefully, particularly if calls and emails are being analysed or summarised.

A sensible approach is to decide which AI use cases you can benefit from now, and which ones should wait until your data, user and process maturity improve. That avoids buying “AI potential” you can’t actually use yet.

Step 10: Run a proof of concept that reflects real workflows

A CRM demo is designed to impress, but a proof of concept reveals the real truth.

Test the workflows that matter most: lead capture through to qualification and handoff, opportunity progression with clear next steps and rules, and reporting that supports decisions. Use real data, even if it’s a small sample and put the system in front of the people who will use it daily and watch for where friction appears. How many clicks does it take to log an activity? How clear is the pipeline view? Can you tell what to do next without hunting? Can marketing see what happened to leads after handoff? Can leadership see pipeline health without someone interpreting it for them?

It is helpful to score it in practical terms: speed, clarity, reliability, and user willingness. If users resist during a trial, they won’t magically embrace it after you’ve signed a three-year contract. Go onto G2 and/or Capterra and read the honest “warts and all” reviews, they will give you further insight into what you can expect and potential roadblocks/mis-understandings.

Step 11: Implement a CRM like a business-critical solution, with proper ownership

Implementation should be treated as a business change programme, not a simple software setup.

Resource and ownership is critical, you need a business owner who cares about commercial outcomes and an ops owner who keeps the system clean, consistent, and continuously improving. Get your process and definitions agreed before you configure too much. Focus on a “minimum viable CRM” for the first release: core fields, one pipeline, essential dashboards, and the automations that remove friction and protect speed to revenue.

Training needs to be role-based and scenario-based. People don’t need a tour of the menu. They need to know how to do their job in the system quickly, and why it helps them. Reinforcement matters too: regular hygiene checks, clear expectations, and reporting that leaders actually use.

Step 12: Put governance in place from the start

CRMs don’t usually fail fast and loud, they degrade slowly over time. Fields proliferate, definitions drift, duplicates pile up, reporting becomes questionable, and users quietly stop trusting the system.

Clear, documented governance prevents this. For example, decide who can change pipeline stages and fields, standardise lead source values and lifecycle definitions with buy-in from the relevant stakeholders (Marketing and Sales) and establish how duplicates are handled. Assign ownership of dashboards and set a cadence for reviewing whether they still reflect how you sell and serve, archive those that are no longer used to avoid overwhelm. An oft overlooked and critical action is to set an ops rhythm of business for integration monitoring to ensure data doesn’t quietly stop syncing.

A CRM is a living, breathing ecosystem in need of solid, consistent stewardship.

Pitfalls I wish more teams spotted early

One of the most common traps is buying based on entry price and discovering later that the capabilities you assumed were included require a major tier upgrade and/or eye-watering storage fees. Another is realising that the CRM relies on other modules for basic commercial functions meaning you end-up buying a broader suite sooner than planned. Lock-ins can also emerge in subtler ways: proprietary objects, limited functionality, or complex implementations that make switching feel impossible.

There’s also the human trap of designing a CRM for reporting rather than execution. It looks great in dashboards, but it doesn’t help the team move work forward, learn and iterate for greater success and faster contract to cash cycles. When this happens, the system becomes a compliance exercise, adoption drops, data quality suffers, and leadership ends up back in spreadsheets. The irony is that the business then blames the tool, when the real issue is a mismatch between system design and user reality.

Call to action

A final word as someone who’s cleaned up too many CRM messes…

Choose the CRM that fits with your commercial strategy, user behaviours, data maturity, and wider stack. Get pricing clarity and future early, and please. . . clean your data ruthlessly before you migrate or set and stick to quality standards if starting from scratch, your entire business will thank you later. Treat AI as a productivity layer that sits on top of good foundations and implement every piece with ownership and governance so it doesn’t quietly deteriorate.

If you practice these core rules consistently your CRM becomes something people rely on rather than avoid and you can spend your time improving revenue performance instead of arguing about whose spreadsheet is correct.

For a structured way to shortlist and choose the right CRM, download our CRM Selection Scorecard 

Use it with your team during vendor demos for an evidence-based evaluation anchored to your commercial goals. 

If you’d like a second set of eyes, we can also review your requirements and vendor options and help you avoid the common (expensive) traps. Get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

a customer dictionary

How to speak your customers' language in b2b marketing

In B2B marketing we are surrounded by jargon, buzzwords, and clever phrasing that makes us feel smart but often does the opposite for the people we most want to reach. So, in some ways, we are masters of our own frustration and only have ourselves to blame.

Confusion is the enemy of decision making. When your audience does not understand what you are saying, they stop listening, they stop engaging, and they choose someone simpler, clearer, and easier to work with.

Speaking the language of your customers is not about dumbing things down. It is about meeting them where they already are, using the words, explanations, and examples that make sense in their world.

Do this well and you may see an impact on sales cycles, build trust faster, and make your marketing feel like a conversation, not a lecture.

1. Listen to how your customers actually talk

Your customers are not experts in your product. They are experts in their own business. That distinction matters.

To speak their language, start by understanding how they describe:

  • Their problems

  • Their priorities

  • The outcomes they care about

  • The risks they worry about

  • The way they talk about suppliers and competitors

The fastest way to learn this is not dashboards. It is real conversations.

  • Sit in on sales calls.

  • Go to sales meetings (marketers are allowed believe it or not!).

  • Listen to discovery.

  • Read RFPs.

  • Review call transcripts.

  • Ask customers to explain things in their own words.

Write down the phrases they use. The metaphors. The shorthand. The emotional cues. This is the raw material your messaging should be built from.

2. Spend time in their world, not just your own

You do not become fluent in a language by reading a dictionary your French class. You become fluent by living in France for a while, hearing it used in context.

The same is true in B2B.

  • Attend the events your customers attend.

  • Read the publications they read.

  • Follow the people they follow.

  • Watch how they talk to each other when they are not being sold to.

  • Build your only relationships and rapport with clients too.

You will start to notice patterns. Certain words come up again and again. Certain problems are described in very specific ways. Certain phrases signal credibility and others trigger scepticism.

That is the difference between sounding like any other vendor and sounding like one of them.

3. Test whether your words really land

Once you start using your customers’ language, do not assume you have nailed it. Check.

Ask:

  • Does this phrase make sense to you?

  • Is this how you would describe the problem?

  • What would you call this in your world?


If people hesitate, rephrase, or translate your words back to you in different terms, that is a signal your language is still too internal.

4. Remove confusion to speed up decisions

Sometimes people do not engage because they are not sure what you mean, what you actually do, or how you are different. The more mental effort it takes to decode your message, the more risk it feels like to engage.

  • Strip out anything that requires explanation.

  • Replace jargon with familiar terms.

  • Swap abstract claims for concrete examples.

  • Say what you do in the words your customers already use.

Clarity is not simplistic. It is respectful. Crowbarring ‘optimizing efficiency’ is not.

5. Use the same language everywhere

Once you have earned fluency, use it consistently.

  • Website

  • Sales decks

  • Case studies

  • Emails

  • LinkedIn posts

  • Proposals

  • Onboarding

When the same words and ideas show up across every touchpoint, people feel understood. And when people feel understood, they trust faster.

6. Keep listening as language evolves

Markets shift. Priorities change. New pressures emerge. The language your customers use will evolve with them.

  • Build regular listening into your process.

  • Review calls.

  • Talk to customers.

  • Debrief with sales.

  • Sense check your messaging every quarter.

The goal is not to sound clever. It is to stay relevant.

Reality check

If your marketing sounds smarter than your customers, you are doing it wrong.

If your customers have to translate your language before they can engage, you are creating friction.

If you could substitute your product name for any other, you are wasting your time.

If your words reflect how they actually think and talk, you are making their lives easier.

That is what speaking your customers’ language really means.

Want help sense checking your messaging?

If you want help pressure testing your messaging, sense checking whether you are really speaking your customers’ language, or getting an outside view from people who have been on both sides of the table, get in touch. We can connect you with experienced B2B marketers who have lived the problems you are trying to explain and know what clarity actually looks like in the real world.

 

champagne CMO CD

How to Spot a Champagne CMO in the Wild

There is a particular character many of us have met in our careers.

They arrive with a fanfare. A big title. A big salary. And a reputation that somehow always seems to survive the wreckage they leave behind.

The ink is barely dry on the contract and already they are restless.

They have not met the team.
They do not yet understand the product.
They could not explain the customer problem if you gave them a whiteboard and an hour.

But they know one thing with absolute certainty.

Everything needs to change.

  • New website.

  • New brand.

  • New message.

  • New colours.

  • New fonts.

  • New positioning.

  • New strategy.

Tear it down. Start again. Make it visible. Make it loud. Make it look like momentum.

That is what the song Champagne CMO is about. And I have met so many…!

Not bad people. Not even always untalented. But leaders who mistake vanity for progress and optics for impact. Who reach for the biggest, shiniest levers first because they are the most visible, the most award friendly, and the easiest way to signal importance.

The song pokes fun at a familiar pattern.

The rebrand before the revenue problem is understood.
The AI strategy before the go to market is fixed.
The keynote before the pipeline.
The awards table before the sales forecast.

Every year, a new buzzword. A new bandwagon. A new silver bullet.

  • Big Data.

  • The Cloud.

  • Web3.

  • Blockchain.

  • The Metaverse.

  • Artificial Intelligence.

Not as tools in service of a clear commercial problem, but as costumes to be worn. Language to be paraded. Saying the things they think their bosses and the masses want to hear.

Right now, it is Artificial Intelligence. Crowbarred into every conversation. Setting off red flags with every soundbite.

Do not get me wrong. Real AI is coming and it will continue to get better and better. But the Champagne CMOs claiming they have increased productivity by 35 percent or that every new product they launch is now AI led are not people you should be listening to, let alone hiring.

If you put a computer in front of them and said show me, they would not know where to start. But that does not stop them climbing on stages and pretending they are leading the way.

Underneath the veneer is a simple truth. Real B2B marketing is hard. And leadership is harder still.

  • It means doing your best with messy data.

  • It means listening to customers.

  • It means aligning with sales.

  • It means being accountable when the numbers do not move. Yet.

That work is slow. Unsexy. And rarely comes with a trophy or a pedestal.

So instead, some leaders reach for theatre.

  • They polish the brand while the engine misfires.

  • They talk transformation while sales squirm.

  • They chase awards while the team quietly burns out.

And when the cracks start to show, they do what they have always done.

  • Move on.

  • New role. New title. New narrative.

  • Eighteen months later, a golden goodbye and a fresh stage to perform on.

Champagne CMO is not really about one person. It is about a system that rewards confidence over competence, presentation over substance, and short term optics over long term value creation.

It is about how easy it is to look like a leader and how hard it is to actually be one.

The irony is that the best CMOs I have ever worked with look nothing like this:

  • They do not arrive with a rebrand. They arrive with a desire for context.

  • They do not lead with slogans. They lead with listening.

  • They do not chase every new trend. They make sure the boring foundations are in place.

They do not need champagne moments to feel important. They care far more about whether the business is healthier, the team is stronger, and the customer is better served than it was a year ago.

That is the quiet punchline of the song.

Real leadership does not need performance, a parade of buzzwords, or the most expensive bottle in the room.

It just needs to do the work.

How many Champagne CMOs could you name over a drink?

Listen to Champagne CMO on Marketing Mixtape

an agency celebrating good blueprints

How to write a good marketing brief

I have written, received, rewritten, and quietly apologised for more marketing briefs than I care to remember.

I have also been on the other side of the table, receiving briefs so unclear they made me wonder if the sender should issue a brief to help them write a brief.

And here is the pattern. When agency work fails, it is rarely because the agency is incompetent. Sometimes it is. But it is almost always because the brief was vague, political, or simply containing too much hope that everyone would be able to build the plane whilst flying it.  

Agencies cannot fix confusion you have not fixed internally. If you cannot clearly explain the problem, nobody can solve it for you. A brief exists for one reason only and that’s to get everybody on the same page.

What a brief is actually for

A brief should not be seen as admin that can be done half assed whilst saving yourself for the face-to-face briefing where you incorrectly assume the agency are understanding every word of what you’re saying whilst furiously nodding their heads.  

The brief is the moment you force yourself to decide what problem you are actually trying to solve, why now, what success looks like commercially, and what is fixed and what is flexible. Even if you know your role inside out, its not until you have to articulate it written down that you truly connect all those synapses and truly understand the big picture and how to communicate it.

B2B marketers have known this for years. Industry bodies like the ANA and 4A’s built entire agency briefing frameworks around exactly these principles. Every serious global brand uses some version of them.

Because without clarity, everything downstream becomes guesswork. Guesswork becomes rework. Rework becomes cost. Cost becomes frustration.

Why most briefs fail in B2B

Most bad briefs are not written by bad marketers. They are written by busy people trying to move quickly. But small gaps early snowball later.

Vague problems like “we need more awareness”. Undefined success like “best in class”. Hidden budgets. Political landmines discovered too late. Multiple stakeholders giving conflicting direction. Treating the brief like something to “talk through later”. From an agency point of view, this is chaos. And chaos produces safe, average work and the odd conversation around things not being in scope. And the output ultimately suffers. 

Stop treating the brief like admin

If the brief is rushed, the thinking is rushed. If the thinking is rushed, the work is rushed.

The brief is the one truth everyone aligns around. It is not a placeholder for a future conversation. Writing it properly is some of the highest ROI time you will ever spend as a marketer.

Start with the business problem, not the deliverable

Too many briefs start like this. “We need a campaign.” “We need a website refresh.” “We need a brand video.” That is already the wrong starting point. Those are solutions.

A brief should start with the problem. For example, “Our win rate in enterprise RFPs has dropped from 22 percent to 14 percent. We think this is because prospects do not understand how we differ from competitors.” Now an agency can think. Not just execute. Specific beats abstract every time.

Use a structure that forces clarity

There are lots of formal templates out there. Most of them say the same thing in different language. Here is the simple structure I use and I feel it consistently works.

  1. Context. Who you are. What is happening commercially. Why this matters now. This is my number one recommendation. Give agencies the honest truth in as much detail as possible. The brief isn’t a sterile marketing brochure. You do not need to sugar coat everything. You get the best out of your doctors by telling them absolutely everything and letting them decide how to proceed. Same principle applies here.

  2. The real problem. What is actually broken or underperforming. With evidence.

  3. Objectives. Business outcomes first. Then marketing outcomes. Be explicit about your KPIs and Objectives and Key Results (OKR). KPIs are operational signals like MQLs from target accounts, conversion rates, or pipeline created. OKRs are strategic outcomes like increasing enterprise pipeline or improving win rate. If you confuse the two, agencies optimise the wrong thing.

  4. Audience. Not “decision makers”. Be precise. Titles, pressures, risks, and how they buy. If you have good personas, share them. If you don’t, it’s really worth putting the effort in before you brief an agency.

  5. Insight. Why would anyone care. What tension or frustration are you solving.

  6. Scope and deliverables. What you think you need the agency to deliver.

  7. Constraints and non-negotiables. Budget ranges (please do this, it wastes time pretending it's a secret), timelines, legal rules, brand requirements, internal politics, technical limitations. Put reality on the table early. Constraints do not limit creativity. They focus it.

  8. Success criteria. How you will judge the work. In plain English. If you cannot describe success clearly, you will never recognise it and it would be unfair to beat the agency with a stick later.

  9. Decision rights and governance. Define who signs off strategy, who approves budgets, who can veto work, how feedback will be consolidated, and what gets escalated. If ten stakeholders can rewrite creative later, the agency needs to know now.

  10. Cadence. Set check ins up front. Weekly, fortnightly, or milestone based. Aligned feedback loops massively reduce rework because assumptions are challenged early.

Separate leading and lagging expectations

Another common failure is expecting instant results, especially in B2B. Some results lead and some lag. Leading signals include engagement, meetings, and early pipeline. Lagging signals include revenue and closed deals. If you brief agencies only on lagging results, you could panic too early and kill good work before it compounds.

Define a single source of truth

One owner. One document. One version. Not email threads. Not conflicting decks. A brief should be the single source of truth everyone refers back to. If stakeholders contradict the brief mid project, you reset alignment. Otherwise, chaos creeps in.

What good versus bad looks like

“Enterprise win rate has fallen 14% in the last 6 months due to perceived weak differentiation in RFPs versus our top competitor.” Versus “Need more awareness.”

“We are only interested in influencing CIOs and procurement leads our Top 20 target Hedge Fund firms.” Versus “Decision makers in financial services.”

Success. “Increase win rate 20 percent in six months for our core service.” Versus “Be market leading.”

Constraints. “Budget is capped at $30,000 for this year and procurement benchmarking is required”. Versus not mentioned.

The difference, again, is clarity. You do not win by hiding anything.

Walk the agency through it live

Never just email the brief. Talk it through. Encourage questions. If an agency does not challenge parts of your brief, worry. The best ones always push back. The great ones walk away if they are not being heard.

Ship the brief early

Do not wait three weeks polishing language. Get a solid version out. Use it. Refine it. Real conversations improve briefs faster than internal wordsmithing ever will. Engage agencies before you have finished the brief, they will add value even if you end up not selecting them.

The simple rule to remember

A good brief makes it obvious what is being bought, why it exists, who it is for, what success looks like, and how decisions will be made. If any of those are fuzzy, the brief is not ready. The clearer you are upfront, the less you pay later in rework, delays, and disappointment.

Call to action

Before your next agency project, stop and write the brief properly. Define the real problem. Be honest about constraints. Agree success criteria. Clarify who decides what. Then sit with sales and ask one question. If we nailed this, what would actually change commercially? Put that answer in the brief.

If you want help building briefs that agencies actually respect and that consistently produce better work, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

emojis relating to case studies

How to write a case study that actually helps you win deals

I have lost count of how many B2B case studies I have read that sound like this.

“Leading global provider…”
“Best in class solution…”
“Seamless transformation…”
“Delighted customer…”

Followed by marketing spiel that definitely came from the marketing team and not the client themselves. By paragraph two you already know whether the whole case study is nonsense or not.

If nobody talks like that in real life, nobody believes it.

Yet marketing teams keep producing them. Beautiful PDFs. Fancy layouts. Sanitized quotes. Then we wonder why no positive feedback is ever received about them. But hey, some firms have no case studies at all so at least something is better than nothing?

Most case studies feel like they are written to impress internally. The best case studies are written to help a prospect make a decision.

What a case study is actually for

A case study is not content. It is not brand storytelling. It is not a trophy cabinet.

For the selling entity, it is a risk reduction tool.

In complex B2B buying, prospective clients are not asking, are these guys impressive?

They are asking:

  • Has someone like me done this before?

  • Did it work in the real world?

  • What broke?

  • How painful was it?

  • Would I look stupid choosing these people?

  • If things went wrong, would these guys help fix it?

This is what Gartner calls sense making. Buying groups use evidence to build confidence and justify decisions internally.

Your case study exists to help them decide to purchase from you.

In plain English, it is social proof and risk reduction. In more technical terms, it is sales enablement. It gives buying groups evidence they can circulate internally to justify a decision. If it cannot survive being forwarded to a CFO or procurement lead, it is not doing its job.

Why most case studies fail

The B2B case studies I have seen fail all follow similar paths:

  • They sound like press releases

  • They hide the messy bits

  • They over claim

  • They use vendor language, not prospect language

  • They report vanity metrics

  • They focus on features, not decisions

They read like marketing. And marketing is exactly what buyers are suspicious of.

So they get ignored. And sales get no help from them.

Reality check

If sales never sends your case studies to prospects, that is not a distribution problem. It is a credibility problem.

Structure it like a story, not a brochure

Authoritative guides all say the same thing in different ways. Case studies that convert follow a clear narrative arc.

Call it what you like. Situation, complication, resolution, results. Or simply problem, decision, outcome. Either way, it mirrors how real buying happens.

A simple structure that consistently works:

  1. Context
    Who they are and why this mattered commercially

  2. The real problem
    What was broken and what it was costing them

  3. The options considered
    Competitors, internal builds, doing nothing

  4. The risks and objections
    What nearly stopped the decision

  5. The approach
    What you did and why those choices mattered

  6. The outcomes
    Hard, commercial results

  7. Lessons learned
    What they would do differently next time

That last one is gold. Almost nobody includes it. It is also the most believable part.

Start with the prospect’s problem, not your solution

The biggest mistake I see is jumping straight to “what we delivered.”

Prospects do not care what you delivered until they recognize themselves in the problem.

So describe the reality.

Not “digital transformation initiative.” More like “these three systems didn’t talk to each other and a team stuck in spreadsheets at midnight.”

Specific beats abstract every time.

Include the messy bits

Perfection kills credibility. If everything sounds seamless, buyers assume it is edited fiction.

Show:

  • Delays

  • Trade offs

  • Internal disagreements

  • Things that did not work first time

  • What you fixed

Small imperfections increase trust. “Here is what went wrong and how we handled it” is far more convincing than “everything was flawless.”

Use real quotes, not marketing quotes

The fastest way to ruin a case study is a ghostwritten quote.

Interview the client properly.

Ask:

  • What kept you up at night before this?

  • What nearly stopped you choosing us?

  • What surprised you during the project?

  • What would you warn others about?

Capture how they actually talk. Keep the rough edges.

Write for sales, not for awards

Sit next to a salesperson and ask, “When would you actually use this?”

If they hesitate, it is not useful.

Strong case studies give sales:

  • Language they can borrow

  • Proof they can forward

  • Numbers they can quote

  • Stories they can tell in meetings

Case studies should feel like ammunition, not collateral.

Visuals like evidence, not decoration

Use:

  • Before and after charts

  • Simple metric tables

  • Pull quotes

  • Snapshots of results

  • Client logos with permission

Focus on metrics that matter:

  • Revenue impact

  • Cost savings

  • Time saved

  • Risk reduced

  • Operational efficiency

If a CFO would not care, neither will your prospect.

Make them easy to share

Nobody wants a 25 page PDF.

Create:

  • A short version

  • A one page summary

  • Slides sales can paste into decks

  • A web page version

  • A PDF

Friction kills usage.

Ship early and iterate

Do not wait six months for the perfect version.

Start simple. Use it in live deals. Get feedback. Improve it.

Case studies get better through iteration, not perfection.

Make it a repeatable process, not a one off project

The teams that do this well treat case studies like a system, not an occasional marketing exercise.

For example:

  • Agree one clear owner

  • Ask sales to nominate one client per quarter

  • Run structured interviews within 30 days of a win

  • Ship a simple V1 in weeks, not months

  • Track usage in CRM or sales feedback

  • Retire anything sales never uses

If you cannot produce two or three solid case studies a quarter, you probably have a process problem, not a customer problem.

Lessons learnt over the years

It is easy to decide you need more case studies. It is much harder to actually source them.

Trying to get case studies made and signed off is almost a rite of passage for every B2B marketer.

Some ways I have succeeded:

Ask sales
Ask sales and client delivery teams for nominations. They have the relationships. Help them position it as low effort and high value for the client.

Incentivize if needed
Run an internal program. Offer a meaningful prize for successful nominations. It works.

Client contracts
Try to weave case study rights into contracts upfront. They will negotiate, but at least you start from yes.

Align with client satisfaction programs
When clients rate you highly or say they would recommend you, ask right then for a testimonial or case study.

Testimonials
If a full case study is not possible, get a short testimonial. Something is better than nothing.

Make sign off simple
Case studies often die at legal. Keep approval forms simple. This is not the Declaration of Independence.

Named clients are better than anonymous
But anonymous is still useful. Give sales options.

Client logos
If it is reasonable, just use them. If they ask you to remove it, apologize and move on.

Writing them before you even mention the subject to the client
Sometimes, you have to grab the bull by the horns and write the case study for the client, then shove it in front of them to say "how do you feel about this case study?". It's amazing what that can do to spur action as editing someone else's work is so much easier than starting from a blank page.

Reality check

A case study that sounds like a brochure may impress internally.
A case study that sounds like real life builds trust with prospective clients.
One gets likes. The other wins deals.

If your case studies make marketing proud but clients ignore them, they are not assets. They are decoration.

The simple rule to remember

A case study is not about proving you are great. It is about helping a prospective client feel safe choosing you.

If it helps them justify the decision internally, it works.

Call to action

Pick your last five case studies and ask sales one question.

Have you used this in a live deal in the last 90 days and did it make a difference?

If the answer is no, rewrite them.

Start with the real problem. Show the risks. Include the messy bits. Use numbers that matter. Let the customer sound human.

If you want help turning your case studies into assets that sales teams actually use, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

lady with cup against wall trying to listen

How to influence the buying group when you are not in the room

I’ve long believed that if we could run a proper win loss analysis on every enterprise deal ever done, we’d find that most decisions are not for the ‘best’ solution, but for the one that carries the least personal and professional risk.

Some organisations still behave as if influence only happens in meetings, presentations, and pitches. But anyone who has sat on the buying side of a large decision knows the real work, debate and decisions happen elsewhere.

In corridor conversations. In internal Slack threads. In late-night email chains. In the quiet moment when someone asks themselves, “If this goes wrong, what will it mean for me?”

Gartner’s Buying Group and Sense Making research shows that complex purchases are made by groups, not individuals, and that progress is blocked less by lack of information and more by lack of confidence and internal alignment. Buyers are rarely asking, “Do we know enough?” They are asking, “Are we sure enough to put our names to this?”

When you are not in the room, influence does not disappear. You just have to hope you have done enough of the right things that it permeates.

How buying groups actually make sense of decisions

Gartner call this ‘sense making’ – the process by which a group interprets information, aligns perspectives, and becomes confident enough to commit. It isn’t about learning features.

In practice, buying groups use external signals to answer questions like:

  • Is this company credible?

  • Do they really understand our world?

  • Have others like us trusted them?

  • Will I look foolish if this goes wrong?

  • Is this the safest decision I can defend internally?

  • Do I want to give these guys business?

  • Do I want to work with them for the foreseeable future?

From the buying side, I once watched a nine-figure technology deal stall for months, not because of any functional gap, but because a CFO quietly told our CIO, “I’m just not convinced these people are a safe pair of hands.” The vendor never heard that sentence. But it decided the outcome.

Conversely, as part of an ABM programme I once ran, we put a prospect in a room with an existing client and then deliberately left. We let them talk for hours without us present. No sales pitch. No marketing slides. No intervention.

When we won the deal, the feedback was simple. They trusted us because we trusted the conversation, and because the client spoke honestly about where we were strong and where we were not, and how we showed up when things went wrong.

That is influence when you are not in the room.

Persuasion versus reassurance

Most marketing is built to persuade. Late-stage B2B buying is about reassurance. It is about helping people defend a decision they already lean towards, not forcing them into a new one.

In those situations, what they do not need is another feature list. They simply want enough confidence to take the final step without fearing personal fallout.

This is why content that genuinely helps get deals over the line does not shout. It steadies.

Mental availability and narrative consistency

Research from the B2B Institute and Ehrenberg Bass introduces the concept of mental availability, which in simple terms means how easily your brand comes to mind in a buying situation and what it is associated with when it does. When I studied B2B marketing over 25 years ago (gulp), we simply called this ‘recall’.

Mental availability is built through consistent association with specific problems, outcomes, and points of view. When stakeholders discuss an issue, your name should feel like a natural, credible reference point.

That only happens when your story is coherent across:

  • Your content

  • Your leadership voice

  • Your subject matter experts

  • Your customers

  • Your partners and analysts

Reality check

If your website, your executives’ LinkedIn feeds, your case studies, and your sales decks all tell slightly different versions of who you are, and in different ways, you are not building influence. It is a wasted opportunity for marginal gains.

Map influence to buying group roles

Gartner’s Buying Group model shows that different stakeholders carry different risks.

The economic buyer worries about strategic impact, financial exposure, and reputation with peers and board.
The technical and functional evaluators worry about feasibility, integration, and whether your team truly understands their reality.
The risk and governance influencers worry about compliance, security, contractual exposure, and personal accountability.

Influence outside the room comes from making sure each of these roles can find reassurance in your external presence.

Proxies for presence

When you are not in the room, others speak for you:

  • Content that explains trade-offs in plain language

  • Leaders who show clarity and stability of thought

  • Experts who share practical lessons from the field

  • Customers who talk honestly about what went wrong and how it was fixed

  • Analysts and partners who validate your position

These act as proxies for your credibility and reduce the psychological cost of choosing you.

The psychology underneath

Several behavioural forces shape this:

  • Authority bias means people trust credible voices.

  • Social proof means they look for evidence others have chosen safely.

  • Loss aversion means the fear of a wrong decision outweighs the upside of a bold one.

  • Status quo bias means familiar often feels safer than better.

Your job as a marketer is to ensure the signals prospective clients encounter counterbalance these forces, not reinforce their anxiety.

How marketing can deliberately shape influence

Practical steps that work:

  • Map priority accounts and their buying group roles

  • Identify the unspoken fears at each stage

  • Build content that answers those fears directly

  • Align visible leaders and experts to those concerns

  • Ensure customers and partners tell consistent stories

  • Train sales on which assets reduce which objections

This is hard work and will require support from the comms team, but it will be hugely valuable to your sales teams and they will really notice it.

How to tell if you are influencing without being present

I doubt we will ever see the holy grail of perfect attribution. But we should be able to see signals:

  • Prospects referencing your content before you send it

  • Stakeholders already using your language internally

  • Fewer late-stage surprises

  • Shorter internal approval cycles

  • Sales reporting higher confidence and fewer defensive conversations

It can be hard for marketing to get explicit credit once this way of working becomes embedded, as sales will simply come to expect it. But the process of putting it in place will make you a stronger, more commercial marketer, and the insight you gain from those conversations will serve you for the rest of your career.

The simple rule to remember

In complex B2B buying, deals are rarely won by the loudest voice in the room. They are won by the most trusted voice in the minds of the group when you are not there.

If your narrative, your people, and your proof help prospective clients feel safe, aligned, and confident, you are influencing the buying group long before the final meeting and materially increasing your chances of winning.

Call to action

For your three most important live deals, ask sales one simple question:

What is the one unspoken fear in the room?

Then audit your content, leadership visibility, and proof points and ask honestly what directly reduces that fear.

  • Map your buying groups.

  • Understand their personal and professional risks.

  • Decide what you want to be trusted for.

  • Ensure your story is consistent wherever they look.

If you want help turning your marketing into a system that builds confidence and consensus when you are not in the room, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

man revealing content for sale under his jacket

How to use content to support live B2B sales deals

It sometimes feels that some B2B organisations still think of content as something that happens before sales get involved. Awareness, consideration, nurture, etc. Then the baton is passed to sales and content becomes background noise.

That is not how buying actually works in reality.

Gartner’s Buying Group research has shown repeatedly that complex B2B purchases are made by groups of six to ten people, each with different concerns, risks, and success criteria. Progress doesn’t really stall because the buyers lack information but because they lack confidence and internal alignment.

Content is one of the main tools buying groups can use to try and nudge that alignment along. Between meetings, in internal threads, and in private preparation.

How buying groups actually use content in live deals

Once a deal is active, content is used to:

  • Sense check what sales has said

  • Prepare for internal conversations

  • Build a shared understanding of the problem

  • Reduce personal and professional risk

  • Validate that a choice is safe and defensible

This is what Gartner calls ‘sense making’. It is the process by which groups interpret information, align their views, and become confident enough to commit.

Content that does not help with sense making rarely helps close deals and probably just irritate the buyer.

Map content to real buying group roles

Gartner’s Buying Group model identifies several roles that appear consistently in complex purchases. For practical purposes, they can be grouped into three clusters.

The economic buyer
The senior executive accountable for business impact. They care about strategic fit, financial outcomes, and whether the decision looks sensible to their peers and board. For them, content must articulate commercial logic, market context, and long-term direction. If you can get them to read it.

The technical and functional evaluators
The people who will live with the solution. CIOs, Heads of Ops, Architects, Practitioners. They care about feasibility, integration, trade-offs, and whether your organisation truly understands their reality. They value depth, realism, and evidence from the field.

The risk and governance influencers
Procurement, Legal, Security, Compliance, Finance. They care about exposure, process, and personal accountability. Their job is to stop bad decisions, not to enable bold ones. They look for reassurance, standards, proof, and precedent.

Reality check
If your content only speaks to the economic story and ignores technical or risk concerns, consensus could collapse later in the deal.

Align content to deal stages, not funnel stages

In live opportunities, content plays different roles at different moments.

Early stage
Reframing and problem definition.
Content that helps the group agree what the real issue is and why change matters.

Mid stage
Evaluation and comparison.
Content that explains approaches, options, trade-offs, and implementation realities.

Late stage
Validation and risk reduction.
Content that proves safety, credibility, and that others have succeeded without disaster. Are you the safe pair of hands? Are you going to pick up the phone at 10pm on a Saturday if the shit hits the fan?

Most B2B content strategies are heavily weighted to early stage and dangerously thin where deals are actually won or lost. Marketers often struggle to go deep into the sales cycle but you could argue that’s where sales need us most.

What content sales actually use

Content that supports deals typically has these characteristics:

  • It addresses real objections raised in meetings

  • It is written in the language prospects use, not internal product language

  • It contains practical detail, not just positioning

  • It shows what good and bad look like, not just success stories

  • It is easy to share internally and easy to quote

This is not brand storytelling, the high-level guff that adds value to no one. It is commercial reassurance.

A simple example in practice

Imagine a complex technology services deal in financial services.

  • The CIO is concerned about transformation risk and a key part of their plan falling over.

  • The Head of Ops worries about disruption and knock on effects of not doing things fast enough or doing things badly.

  • Procurement focuses on contractual exposure.

  • Security wants proof of maturity.

A content set that genuinely supports the deal might include:

  • An executive brief on how similar firms managed change without destabilising operations

  • A practical integration guide written by delivery leaders, in their language

  • A case study that openly discusses what went wrong and how it was fixed

  • A security and compliance overview mapped to regulatory language

Each piece speaks to a different fear. Together they help the group say yes.

How to organise content so sales can actually use it

The strongest organisations:

  • Map content to buying group roles

  • Tag assets by objection and decision stage

  • Train sales on when to use what, and why

  • Review which assets appear in progressing deals

  • Retire or rewrite content that never features in real conversations

This turns content from a library into a decision support system.

How to measure contribution without pretending attribution

You will not get clean last click revenue attribution. That is not how complex buying works.

Instead, we need to look for:

  • Content presence in progressing opportunities

  • Stakeholder engagement across buying groups

  • Reduced repetition of the same objections

  • Shorter time between deal stages

  • Sales feedback on prospect confidence and preparedness (key internally!)

This is what influenced pipeline and opportunity velocity look like in practice.

Reality check
If your best content never appears in live sales conversations, it is not doing the job you think it is.

The simple rule to remember

In our B2B world, content does not exist to generate traffic.It exists to reduce risk, build confidence, and help groups of people make hard decisions together.

If it does not support sense making and consensus, it is noise. And the one thing our buyers and marketing in general, need is yet more noise.

Call to action

If you want content to help win deals, stop planning around formats and start planning around decisions.

  • Map your buying groups.

  • Map their fears, questions, and internal politics.

  • Map where confidence breaks down.

  • Then build content that helps them make sense of what they are about to commit to.

If you want help turning your content into a system that supports real commercial decisions rather than a publishing machine, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

linkedin logo spray painted on black wall

How to use LinkedIn to support live sales deals

Most B2B organisations still treat LinkedIn as a parallel marketing activity. Content is published. Executives post occasionally (quite often via junior members of the comms team). Sales connect and sometimes message. None of it is deliberately tied to what is happening inside live deals.

That is a mistake.

Gartner and CEB research have shown for years that complex B2B purchases are made by buying groups, not individuals, and that confidence, consensus, and risk reduction are as important as product capability. Today, a significant part of that sense making happens on LinkedIn.

When a deal is live, buying group members use LinkedIn to:

  • Validate who you are

  • Assess whether your people understand their world

  • Look for stability and leadership

  • Seek peer and analyst signals

  • Quietly reduce perceived risk

Now, they may not be consciously doing this. But they are doing this. LinkedIn is already influencing deals and most teams just are not managing it.

Map LinkedIn to real buying group roles

To make this practical, think about the three roles that almost always shape enterprise decisions.

The economic buyer
Usually a C suite or senior commercial leader. They care about business impact, risk, stability, and whether your leadership looks credible and in control. For them, LinkedIn presence should demonstrate strategic clarity, market understanding, and organisational maturity.

The technical or functional evaluator
Often a CIO, CTO, Head of Ops, or senior practitioner. They look for depth, realism, and whether your people genuinely understand the problem space. Here, subject matter experts sharing practical insight, trade-offs, and lessons learned matter far more than polished marketing messages.

The risk and compliance influencer
Legal, security, procurement, or governance roles. They are looking for trust signals, proof, and reassurance that choosing you will not expose them. Analyst commentary, customer stories, and evidence of process maturity play a big role.

Reality check
If your LinkedIn presence only speaks to one of these groups, you are leaving the others to form their own, often conservative, conclusions.

Create a simple deal support loop

To move from theory to practice, I often recommend teams treat LinkedIn as part of their deal operating rhythm.

A simple model that works in B2B organisations looks like this:

  • Identify priority live accounts in CRM

  • Map the buying group and key roles

  • Agree which internal voices should be visible to each role

  • Define the themes that reduce risk at this stage of the deal

  • Coordinate light, authentic visibility and engagement

  • Review which stakeholders viewed, followed, or engaged

This is not about orchestrated commenting or spammy activity. It is about making sure the right people, with the right credibility, are visible to the right stakeholders at the right time. And in the largest, transformational deals, you should be looking for any marginal gain you can get. From a career perspective, hearing a marketer talk about this stuff could really help the internal perception of them, we’re thinking about marketing from a commercially lense here.

A simple example of LinkedIn supporting one live deal

Imagine a £500k enterprise software deal with a financial services firm. The buying group includes a CIO, a Head of Operations, a Procurement lead, and a Risk Director.

Before first contact
Marketing and sales agree this is a priority account. The CIO and Head of Ops are already connected to your CTO and one of your lead consultants. Over the previous month, both have seen thoughtful posts about regulatory change and operational resilience. When the first outreach email arrives, your company name is not unfamiliar. Response rates are higher because recognition and credibility are already forming.

During evaluation
The technical team is assessing your platform against two competitors. Your subject matter experts are sharing practical perspectives on integration challenges and lessons learned from similar clients. The Head of Ops clicks through to a case study and notices several of your consultants commenting with real implementation insight and its clearly written by them and not the comms team. This quietly reinforces that you have depth, not just marketing polish.

Late stage and risk sign off
Procurement and Risk are now involved. They look at your leadership team on LinkedIn. They see consistent messaging about security, governance, and long-term partnership. They also see analysts and partners engaging with your content. Nothing raises red flags. No grand claims, no hype. Just steady, credible signals. The internal question shifts from “Are they safe” to “Which of the three is the safest?”.

LinkedIn will not close a deal; I’d never go that far. But it can help reduce uncertainty, reinforce confidence, and make every sales conversation a little easier and are useful reasons to follow up for salespeople who want to reinforce a point made in a meeting.

Warm accounts before outreach

Before the first call, familiarity matters. LinkedIn’s own B2B Institute and ABM research from firms like ITSMA (which I have a long history with – I met my wife at one of their conferences!) consistently show that recognition and perceived expertise increase response rates.

This means:

  • Ensuring target stakeholders are connected to relevant leaders and experts

  • Making sure your company and people appear in their feed in a useful, non-promotional way

  • Establishing presence before the first sales interaction

The goal should be to ensure that by the time outreach happens, you are no longer a cold name.

Support evaluation and objection handling

Late-stage objections are rarely about features. They are about giving the buyers confidence that they are ready to finalize their decision.

  • Is this company stable?

  • Do they really understand our industry?

  • Are we taking a personal or professional risk by choosing them?

  • Will they be a safe long term partner?

LinkedIn content and presence can quietly address these by:

  • Showing how your leaders think about industry change. I mean truly them not sanitised BS that takes the soul and personality from their views.

  • Demonstrating how your experts handle complexity

  • Sharing how clients have navigated challenges with you. REAL anecdotes and stories.

  • Providing analyst and partner validation

This is narrative reassurance, not sales scripting.

A hard truth
We all know that people by from people. Most B2B deals are lost on confidence, not capability. LinkedIn is now one of the main places that confidence is formed for relatively new professional people in your life, yet it is still treated as a side project. It may not make you like someone but it sure can put you off dealing with them.

What not to do

To use LinkedIn effectively in live deals, it helps to be clear about what actively undermines credibility.

Avoid

  • Generic thought leadership that says nothing specific

  • Engagement bait and motivational poster content

  • Over polished, obviously ghostwritten executive posts

  • Automated connection and messaging sequences

  • Product pushing in public threads

Senior buyers can smell inauthenticity and manipulation instantly. It erodes trust rather than builds it. I like to call it Social Influenza.

How sales should use LinkedIn day to day

At an individual level, effective sales use of LinkedIn includes:

  • Researching stakeholder backgrounds and priorities

  • Following what matters to them

  • Sharing relevant insight before and after meetings

  • Reinforcing key points with credible third party content

  • Staying visible without being intrusive

The best salespeople already do this. The best organisations support it with training, content, and alignment.

How to evidence impact

You will never be able to claim direct attribution in the same way as paid media. But you can show contribution.

Useful indicators include:

  • Growth of relationships within target accounts

  • Profile views and follows from buying group members

  • Engagement with deal relevant content

  • Improved reply rates and meeting acceptance

  • Sales feedback on confidence and preparedness of prospects. And that’s a key one. If they verbally support what marketing

  • is doing to support their active deals and have been actively involved, there’s half the battle won.

The simple rule to remember

The biggest and best deals are competitive and strategic use of LinkedIn can give your team a very slim edge. At the very least, it can really help insert strategic communication thoughts into the sales team and, if at the very least, they have more relevant and tailored material to call upon and have the talking points front of mind.

Sometimes it’s the little things that could tip deals into your favour.

Call to action

If you want LinkedIn to support live sales deals, stop treating it as a social channel and start treating it as part of your commercial system.

  • Map buying group roles.

  • Align visible voices to those roles.

  • Agree the stories and proof that reduce risk at each stage.

  • Support sales to use LinkedIn deliberately, not opportunistically.

If you want help turning LinkedIn into a genuine deal support capability rather than a vanity platform, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

businessmen making a predator handshake

How to collaborate better with commercial operations

"Hey, we're about to have a strategy meeting - can I invite you/your team?" These words are heard way too infrequently by Commercial Ops and it costs businesses money. All too often, until a nurturing sequence, form or automation breaks, nobody cared how the leads arrived in their inbox, who maintained how they got to them, or what “data hygiene” even means.

Marketing Operations (MOps) and Sales Operations (SOps, together; Commercial Ops) often live in an invisible zone.

When working well, it’s quiet, prospects are nurtured and leads route correctly. Emails and segmentation behaves, forms funnel leads for actions smoothly and the data is usable. Sales sees what it needs at the right time and your prospects experience a coherent journey from “I’m curious” to “Let’s talk” without a spray-and-pray email avalanche, confusion, or being ghosted.

When it’s not working, teams panic and the finger-pointing begins. Why are leads going to the wrong rep? Why did the nurture email hit customers and prospects with the same message, etc? 

Ops can feel “difficult” – bear with them

Most commercial strategies look elegant on slides but real life is more complicated. People have limited time, definitions are not clarified or drift and systems don’t behave as expected. That doesn’t even include clients - who do unexpected things (like clicking “request a demo” three times, or buying after reading a blog post without ever filling out a form!) 

Commercial Ops is hardwired to surface the questions that knit “great idea” into “operational reality.” These questions can feel inconvenient because they question ideas early by demanding clarity and trade-offs. They expose where leadership hasn’t agreed on what “good” looks like. That can be uncomfortable but it’s also exactly how you avoid wasting months and money building the wrong thing.

A strong Commercial Ops function tends to ask questions like: What outcome are we actually driving here - pipeline this quarter, revenue later, retention, expansion or partner-sourced deals? Who exactly is this for, and what are we choosing to ignore so we keep focus? What is the customer experience end-to-end, including the bits after the form submit when people are waiting? What counts as an MQL and SQL in our business, not someone else’s framework? How will we measure impact, and what data needs to exist for that measurement to be trustworthy? Who owns each step, and what happens when they don’t do it?

These aren’t “admin” questions, they are commercial questions that sharpen and ground your plan in reality for repeatable execution. 

What do Commercial Ops do?  

These professionals often get reduced to “the person who makes HubSpot work” or “the team that runs the tools.” Tools matter, yet that framing misses the bigger value which is Marketing Ops is the discipline of designing and running the systems behind growth: the data, workflows, automation, measurement, and operational experience that customers and revenue teams move through every day.

When MOps is included early, the following happens that commercial leaders care about:

First, decisions get better. Commercial decisions rely on signal: segment performance, funnel conversion, acquisition cost, channel mix, pipeline velocity, response rates, intent signals, and the story the data is telling. When the signal is confusing, the business makes expensive guesses and then argues about what happened later. Commercial Ops improves decision quality by engineering reliable capture, consistent definitions, and a sensible measurement system that leadership can trust.

Second, execution gets faster, sustainably. Speed is about being able to act repeatedly, learning, and scaling without rebuilding every single time by creating reusable assets like campaign templates, routing logic and automation flows so the business can move quickly without creating fragile systems that collapse when one person goes on holiday.

Third, customer experience improves. The buying journey has an operational interface, including how many form fields you demand, whether the thank-you page is helpful, how quickly someone follows up, if sales is informed or unaware, and whether the emails they receive make sense based on what they did. Commercial Ops shapes that operational UX directly affecting buyer experience  in particular trust, conversion, and momentum.

The hidden cost of excluding Commercial Ops from commercial decisions

When Commercial Ops is invited late, predictable failures occur. Some examples include: backlogs because nobody mapped capacity, sequencing, or implementation; sales and marketing disagree on reality because dashboards tell different stories and definitions aren’t consistent, or Leads get mishandled, either routed incorrectly or followed up too slowly.

Customer experience suffers in invisible ways that aren’t clear immediately, or in a single measurable way, such like duplicate emails, irrelevant nurture, inconsistent messaging or sales conversations that start from zero context, all of which require operational clean-up.

I can’t emphasise this more - that clean-up cost is usually higher than the cost of doing it properly upfront and breaks trust internally. Teams lose confidence in systems (and sometimes, more dangerously, each other), then build workarounds, then your process becomes a patchwork of spreadsheets and Teams messages. 

An inclusive operating approach 

Including Commercial Ops in commercial decisions doesn’t have to turn everything into decision-by-committee. It means thinking of ops in the moments where decisions become operational reality, and giving them clear ownership over how the system is built.

A practical starting point is to change your mindset about Commercial Ops from downstream execution to co-designer of growth and the easiest way to do that is to decide which decisions require an ops voice. Any decision that changes what you measure, how customers move through the journey, or who owns which step should involve Commercial Ops early. Think go-to-market changes, pricing and packaging changes, lifecycle definitions, lead qualification rules, campaigns, CRM or MarTech changes, integrations, and anything that touches customer data, consent, or handoffs.

The Strategy-to-Execution Brief: one page that changes everything

If you adopt one habit, make it this: every meaningful initiative gets a short “Strategy-to-Execution Brief” that Commercial Ops helps shape. Keep it to one page. The goal is to translate intent into an executable system before you commit timelines and targets.

In paragraph form, the brief answers: What are we trying to achieve commercially, and in what timeframe? Who is the target audience, what is the offer, and what is the call-to-action? Where in the funnel are we expecting movement, and how will we know the initiative worked? What operational requirements exist - changes to the CRM, automation, routing, tracking, data capture? Who owns each step, what is the expected follow-up time, and what happens if that follow-up doesn’t happen? What risks exist - tracking gaps, deliverability issues, consent problems, data quality - and how will we mitigate them?

This is about creating a clarity mechanism that Commercial Ops co-authors with marketing and sales leadership.

Definitions are a fundamentally necessary foundation 

Every organisation claims it wants alignment, which consequently requires shared language. Without it, you can’t tell whether you’re winning, and you can’t compare performance across teams, segments, and time periods. Definitions may sound boring until they save you. I have unfortunately experienced working in many businesses where this clarity was never defined or documented resulting in consistent misalignment and mistrust between teams and results.

At minimum, commercial leadership should align on what counts as a lead, what “marketing engaged” means, how qualification works, what an SQL is, deal stages and how customers move through lifecycle stages, and what disqualification reasons look like. These definitions should be documented and embedded in the systems, CRM properties, validation rules, routing logic, reporting dashboards, and onboarding materials so users behave consistently.

This discipline highlights where definitions create unintended consequences. If you reward volume, you’ll get volume, or “MQLs” without quality controls, and you’ll get a funnel full of people who were never going to buy, turning it into a vanity metric vortex. Commercial Ops helps design the system so your incentives and definitions support revenue outcomes rather than vanity metrics.

Designing the buying journey like it’s a product

Buyer experience or BX has never been more important. In 2025 I saw a brand new AI-enabled CRM built around this exact premis. The fact of the matter is that prospects experience your sequence of operational steps long before they experience your service or product. 

A practical way to include Commercial Ops is to treat the buyer journey like a product flow. Map how someone enters, what they see, what they do, and what happens next. Then pressure-test the edge cases, because edge cases are where systems break and reputation suffers. For example - what happens when someone is already a customer and requests a demo? What happens when someone is in a region you don’t serve? What happens when the lead source is missing?

Commercial Ops shines here because it thinks in “if this, then that” mode which supports customer experience and protects team time and reduces the number of “why didn’t it work?” post-mortems.

A lightweight rhythm of business that keeps ops embedded

A short weekly revenue execution check-in (30 - 45 minutes) can be enough: what was executed, what wasn’t, what’s blocked, what decisions are needed and what the funnel signals are saying across your top 3 KPIs. A monthly funnel health review (60 minutes) can focus on looking for leakage points, SLA compliance, conversion trends, and what experiments are working. A quarterly alignment session allows for bigger discussions such as GTM changes, new products in the pipeline that need CRM field and journey thought, tech stack reviews, governance, and what operational investments will support the next stage of growth.

Give Commercial Ops ownership over the “how”

A common pattern is that leadership wants ops accountable while refusing to let ops make operational decisions which slows down execution, creates constant rework, and resentment on all sides.

Commercial leaders and founders should own the “why” and the “what”: commercial goals, target segments, strategic bets and resource allocation. Commercial Ops should own the “how” within its domain: data architecture, lifecycle implementation, routing logic, automation design, tracking and reporting, documentation, and governance.

When Commercial Ops has clear swim-lanes and actual authority, execution speeds up and fewer changes need to be reversed later.

What inclusive leadership looks like day-to-day

Inclusive commercial leadership brings ops in early, while ideas are still being cogitated rather than after deadlines have been promised. It treats operational questions as a necessary discipline that sharpens strategy, tests assumptions, and turns a vision into something buildable, not as “pushback” to be managed. It protects focus by making hard prioritisation decisions, choosing fewer initiatives that can be executed properly over a long list that collapses. It also guards against tech stack proliferation by resisting tool sprawl and one-off workarounds that quietly create cost and complexity later. 

A quick test for whether you’re building an ops-inclusive culture, ask yourself - what happens when something breaks? Does the team ask “who mucked up?” or “what do the systems allow?” [Tip, you are aiming for the latter response!]

Your simple next step: 

Take your next campaign, GTM shift, new product/service, or funnel initiative and write a one-page Strategy-to-Execution Brief with your Commercial Ops lead (or the colleague currently undertaking the MOps and/or SOps work). If you don’t have that capability in-house, or you want an experienced expert to help you, get in touch and we can connect you with a marketing operations or sales operations expert who can help you design the brief, tighten your definitions, and turn the plan into a working system that supports your revenue objectives.

man shaking hands with robot

How to build content AI can trust

For most of my career, content health was a quiet, unglamorous topic that I left to the content team. It mattered, but it rarely felt urgent. Outdated pages were an SEO problem. Inconsistent messaging was a brand problem. Duplicate content was a technical problem. All fixable. All largely contained. And the content team were on top of it all.

AI has changed that and we now need to be much more in front of things.

When AI systems start shaping answers, recommending suppliers and summarising what your company stands for, any weakness in your content estate gets amplified. Old claims get resurfaced. Inconsistent terminology gets repeated. Half-forgotten positioning gets treated as current truth.

That could confuse prospects, shapes expectations before sales ever speak to them, introduce risk late in the buying cycle and undermine confidence in pricing, proof or credibility. If by chance any of that happened, fingers would be pointed at Marketing & Comms.

Content debt used to be an efficiency issue. But it is increasingly a pipeline and reputation risk.

Reality check
If you would be uncomfortable with an AI assistant quoting a page from your site to a prospect in a senior level conversation, that page is not healthy.

What healthy content actually means in an AI world

Healthy content is not about how much you publish. It is about whether your content can be safely trusted by both humans and machines.

In practical terms, healthy content is:

  • Accurate

  • Current

  • Consistent

  • Structured

  • Owned

Content debt is the opposite. It is outdated, duplicated, contradictory or orphaned content that no one maintains but AI systems will happily reuse anyway.

In an AI mediated buying journey, content health becomes part of commercial risk management, not just marketing hygiene.

Most AI used in marketing today is generative AI, powered by large language models. These models generate language by predicting likely word sequences based on patterns in training data. They do not understand your market, your strategy or your legal and commercial constraints.

Two technical terms matter.

Inference is the process of generating an answer in response to a prompt.
Hallucination is when that answer sounds plausible but is factually wrong.

A third term is worth understanding.

Retrieval augmented generation is how many AI systems now work. Instead of relying only on what they learned in training, they actively retrieve content from the web or from indexed sources and stitch answers together from what they find. In plain English, they are not just guessing. They are selecting, weighting and reusing the content that looks most authoritative and coherent.

That is why structure, consistency and accuracy in your own content matter so much. What is most clearly defined and repeatedly reinforced becomes the story the machine tells about you.

Reality check
AI understands patterns and sources, not truth, nuance or consequence.

Where AI genuinely helps with content health

Used properly, AI is extremely useful for the unglamorous but critical work that keeps content trustworthy over time.

In B2B, AI is well suited to:

  • Pulling from various research and source materials

  • Producing first drafts for human refinement

  • Summarising sales calls and extracting recurring questions

  • Identifying duplicate or overlapping content

  • Spotting outdated pages and terminology

  • Supporting content audits and gap analysis

  • Monitoring how your brand and key topics appear in AI generated answers

This is copilot work. It accelerates preparation and maintenance. It absolutely does not replace judgement.

Where AI must not be allowed to decide

AI should not own:

  • Positioning

  • Value propositions

  • Competitive claims

  • Pricing or legal language

  • Final external copy

  • Anything a salesperson will forward directly to a prospect without context

These decisions require commercial judgement, brand accountability and an understanding of consequence.

Reality check
If a decision would normally require senior sign off, AI does not remove that requirement.

Treat content health as an operating discipline

The biggest mistake I see is treating content health as problem for the comms team. It is not. It is an operational one.

A healthy content operation has:

  • Clear ownership for every major content area

  • Defined workflows for creation, review, update and retirement

  • Agreed sources of truth for product, pricing, legal and positioning

  • A regular content audit cadence, not a once a year panic exercise

  • The ability to answer simple questions like what do we have, is it right and who owns it?

A simple operating rhythm that actually works in large B2B organisations looks like this.

  • Quarterly content health review focused on priority prospect problems

  • Named business owner for each problem area and its core pages

  • AI supported audit of accuracy, overlap and freshness

  • Human sign off on any content that defines positioning, proof or claims

  • Retirement or consolidation of weak or conflicting pages

  • One internal source of truth for anything an AI system might quote

This is not process for the sake of process. It is what makes AI safe to use at scale. Without it, AI simply helps you spread inconsistency faster.

Content observability, explained in plain English

A term you will hear more often is content observability. It means being able to see and understand the state of your content estate at any point in time.

In everyday language, it means:

  • Knowing what content exists

  • Knowing where it is used

  • Knowing whether it is accurate and current

  • Knowing whether it is being trusted and referenced

  • Knowing what needs fixing, consolidating or deleting

One uncomfortable truth here. Most content problems persist not because teams do not know what good looks like, but because no one is truly accountable for deleting things. Creation has owners. Maintenance rarely does and often only when you’re moving from one website platform to another. AI makes that neglect visible.

Structure matters more than volume

AI driven discovery rewards clarity and coherence, not publishing frequency.

This means:

  • Clear definitions of key terms

  • Consistent use of language across pages

  • Strong topical depth around the problems you want to be known for

  • Structured content that machines can parse and humans can understand

  • Fewer, better maintained pages rather than endless new ones


Reality check
If your content library is growing faster than your ability to maintain accuracy, you could be building content debt, not authority.

How to measure whether your content is actually healthy

Output metrics like number of pages, words published or time to draft tell you very little, as former CMO, I can tell you we have no interest in those statistics.

In B2B, healthier signals include:

  • Sales teams reusing content in live deals

  • Prospects arriving better informed and with fewer basic questions

  • Reduced late stage misunderstandings and objections

  • More consistent language across regions and teams

  • Growing visibility for the right problems, not just more traffic

If AI assisted content makes it easier for sales to explain, reassure and close, it is helping. If it increases output but creates confusion or inconsistency, it is not. Although, as with most things in our world, that is easier said than done.

The simple rule to remember

AI will amplify whatever state your content is already in.

If your content is accurate, consistent and well governed, AI increases your reach and credibility.
If your content is fragmented, outdated or poorly owned, AI accelerates confusion, risk and sales friction.

AI does not create content problems, but it could expose them and if you’re looking for a competitive edge, and those marginal gains, then best get on top of it.

Call to action

If you are serious about using AI without damaging trust, stop thinking about tools and start thinking about content health as an operating discipline.

  • Audit what you have.

  • Identify and retire content debt.

  • Define and protect sources of truth.

  • Be explicit about ownership and sign off.

  • Use AI to support research, drafting, monitoring and maintenance.

  • Keep strategy, positioning and judgement firmly human.

If you want help turning this into a practical content health and AI readiness programme that your leadership team and sales organisation can trust, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like

SEO reporting lady

How to report SEO internally

It’s quite hard to bring executives along with you on an SEO journey.

It’s easy to explain it all at a high level because everyone has used Google. But it’s much harder for outsiders to understand why it matters, how hard it is to get right and why they must support you in spending time and money on it. I am unsure it helps that SEO is so often bundled with PPC and paid media, which is very binary in its reporting.

Sometimes it feels like SEO reporting is all about communicating upwards…maintaining belief long enough for results to compound.

Why SEO reporting fails in B2B organisations

There are three structural reasons SEO reporting struggles to garner support internally:

  1. Buying cycles are long, so revenue takes time to arrive

  2. SEO delivers influence before conversion; not last click wins.

  3. Most reporting defaults to consumer style metrics, which do not reflect how prospects actually buy in B2B.

When those three collide, SEO can look slow, fuzzy, and optional to people that don’t quite ‘get it’.

Start by agreeing what SEO is responsible for

Before you build a single report, align on what SEO is meant to do.

In our world, SEO is often responsible for:
• Increasing visibility for priority prospect problems
• Educating prospects earlier in the buying process
• Supporting sales conversations with credible content
• Improving conversion quality rather than volume

If SEO is expected to drive revenue in the same way as paid media, it will fail the test unfairly and B2B marketers have to acknowledge the comparisons outsiders will automatically make.

Reality check
If SEO’s role is not articulated well, it will be judged against the wrong criteria.

Stop reporting the wrong things first

Before improving SEO reporting, most teams need to stop reporting something else.

If your report leads with rankings, total traffic, or an SEO score, you are training stakeholders to ask the wrong questions. Those metrics are not useless, but when they dominate reporting they crowd out the signals that actually matter.

Good SEO reporting replaces vanity with relevance.

Separate leading and lagging indicators in every report

Leading indicators are early signals that progress is happening.
Lagging indicators are outcomes that appear later.

This usually looks like:

Leading indicators:
• Impressions in Google Search Console
• Click through rate on priority queries
• Query breadth across a topic
• Ranking stability over time

Lagging indicators
• Conversions
• Assisted conversions
• Pipeline influence
• Revenue

Leading indicators build confidence that the things you and the team are doing are starting to work. Lagging indicators validate that it did.

Reality check
If you only report lagging indicators, SEO will always look like it is underperforming.

Use Search Console

Google Search Console should sit at the heart of SEO reporting because it comes directly from Google and reflects actual search visibility.

Key technical terms to explain internally:

Impressions
How often your pages appear in search results. This measures visibility, not interest.

Clicks
How often searchers choose your result. This reflects interest.

Click through rate
Clicks divided by impressions. This reflects how relevant and credible your result appears in the SERP (Search Engine Results Page).

Average position
The average ranking across impressions. Useful for trend context, not precision.

Query
The exact phrase a prospect searched for. This reveals how prospects describe problems.

Query breadth
The range of related queries you appear for. This indicates growing topical authority.

Search Console should be used to show whether visibility is expanding in the right problem spaces, not whether one keyword moved up or down.

Give executives a simple reporting spine

Good B2B SEO reporting should always answer three questions:

  1. Are we visible for the right prospect problems?

  2. Is trust and credibility increasing?

  3. Is that trust showing up in pipeline behaviour?

Whenever I stepped into new CMO roles, it would make me so happy to see something that at least resembled that thought process.

Explain SERPs and intent to non-marketers

A SERP, or Search Engine Results Page, is what Google shows after a search.

You cannot report on SEO properly without referencing the SERP, because the SERP reveals search intent, meaning what the searcher is actually trying to achieve.

Intent typically falls into patterns like learning, comparing, validating, or deciding.

If your content does not match the dominant intent of the SERP, rankings alone will not convert.

Reality check
If traffic is not converting, the answer is usually in the SERP. A spreadsheet shows performance while the gold ol’ SERP shows intent. If Google is rewarding educational content, expect education behaviour, not conversions.

Show contribution without overclaiming revenue

This is where B2B marketers can look a little silly. Most SEO value shows up as assisted influence, not last click revenue.

An assisted conversion is when SEO influenced a prospect’s journey but was not the final interaction before conversion.

Prospects often discover, research, and validate through organic search weeks before they speak to sales. By the time they convert, they already know who you are.

If reporting only credits the final click, SEO will appear invisible. It’s really important that B2B marketers control the narrative and communicate the full picture, every time.  

Reality check
If SEO never appears in assisted conversions, either SEO is failing or attribution is broken.

Connect SEO reporting to GA4 and CRM language

GA4 measures what prospects do after they land on your site.

Key concepts to explain simply:

Conversion
A tracked action that matters commercially.

Attribution
How credit for conversions is assigned across channels.

Assisted influence
Where SEO supports the journey without closing it.

In CRM terms, SEO should be discussed in relation to
• Deal quality
• Sales velocity
• Objection handling
• Content usage in live deals

The best Chief Marketing/Commercial/Revenue Officer’s care less about where you rank and more about whether prospects arrive informed, confident, and easier to close. Why? Because they can use that narrative and evidence upwards (and sidewards with sales peers).

Report less often, but with more narrative

Quarterly SEO reporting can focus on:
• Leading indicators
• Visibility trends
• Early behavioural signals

With a narrative rich story around:
• Assisted influence
• Pipeline contribution
• Strategic progress against priority topics

Giving your CMO that insight is so useful for them to have in their arsenal.

Reality check
If your report cannot be explained verbally to a sales leader in five minutes, you may not understand it well enough.

Understand evidence versus proof

SEO reporting rarely provides courtroom proof and, like many things with marketing, there does need to be some level of believe that if you do the right things, the results will come. Reporting should gradually build that evidence that value is accruing over time.
It builds evidence that value is accruing over time.

Expecting certainty too early is one of the fastest ways to increase the risk of killing a good programme that would have produced in the end.

The metrics that quietly kill SEO programmes

Avoid these in senior reporting:

•       Vanity ranking snapshots

•        Total organic traffic without intent segmentation

•       Single KPI SEO scorecards

•       Last click only revenue charts

•       Data overload

As a former CMO, I can tell you that I really don’t want to see table after table or screenshot after screenshot of SEMrush or various tools. I want the numbers I should care about and your, evidenced, narrative. Leave the rest for the appendix.

The simple rule to remember

SEO reporting exists to maintain confidence while authority compounds.

If SEO is reported like a channel that should perform instantly, you are encouraging your stakeholders to come to the wrong conclusions and it will be hard to get them back after you’ve lost them.

Call to action

If you want SEO to survive and thrive internally, stop reporting it like a consumer channel.

Agree what SEO is responsible for. Separate leading and lagging indicators. Use Search Console to show growing visibility in the right problem spaces. Connect that visibility to assisted influence, sales confidence, and pipeline quality over time.

If you want help building an SEO reporting approach that senior stakeholders actually trust, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

man holding ruler

How to measure SEO success

All B2B Marketer’s know that SEO matters but we often measure it in ways that make us look busy rather than useful. Rankings go up, traffic goes up, and yet nothing changes commercially. Eventually someone senior decides SEO is a hobby and cuts it.

So, let’s be clear on what success actually means.

In our world, winning in SEO does not mean ranking first. It means earning a disproportionate share of visibility and trust for the prospect questions that matter and doing so consistently enough to influence real buying decisions over time.

Start by separating leading and lagging indicators

This distinction really matters because it prevents good work being killed too early.

Leading indicators are early signals that progress is happening before revenue shows up.
Lagging indicators are outcomes that arrive later, such as pipeline and revenue.

In B2B, lagging indicators move slowly because buying cycles are long. If we only measure lagging indicators, we risk concluding SEO is failing long before it has had a chance to work.

Reality Check
If leading indicators are not improving, SEO is probably not working.
If leading indicators are improving but revenue has not arrived yet, be patient.

Decide what SEO is meant to achieve commercially

This is where many teams go wrong. They measure whatever a dashboard makes easy to measure.

Common B2B objectives include:
• Increasing qualified inbound enquiries from target prospects
• Improving conversion rates on high intent pages
• Reducing friction in sales conversations by educating prospects earlier

So it’s best to build your reporting with this in mind and being ruthless with vanity metrics.

 Use Search Console as your source of truth

Google Search Console is obviously their own reporting tool for how your site performs in Google Search. It is not perfect, by any means, but it is the closest thing you have to ground truth for organic visibility.

Here are the Search Console metrics that matter, explained plainly.

Impressions
An impression is counted when your page appears in a search result. In plain English, this reflects visibility, not interest.

Clicks
A click is when someone selects your result and lands on your site. This reflects interest turning into action.

Click through rate
Click through rate is clicks divided by impressions. It reflects how relevant and credible your result appears in the SERP (Search Engine Results Page).

Average position
Average position is the average ranking of your result across impressions. It is a rough indicator of competitiveness but can be misleading when rankings fluctuate or when multiple URLs rank.

Query
A query is the exact phrase typed by a searcher. This is how prospects describe their problem in their own words. Super insightful for marketers.

Landing page
A landing page is the page that earns the impression or click. This is the asset doing the work.

Measure success in a clear hierarchy

To avoid dashboard sprawl, measure SEO in this order.

  1. Visibility for the right problems
    Impressions growth for priority topics and prospect questions.

  2. Trust and engagement signals
    Click through rate improvement, ranking stability, and repeat exposure in relevant SERPs.

  3. Commercial contribution
    Assisted conversions, conversion rates on high intent pages, and pipeline influence.

These signals reflect progress and help so much in demonstrating marketing’s value.

Measure at three levels: query, page, and topic

Query level
This shows which prospect questions you are earning visibility for.

Track:
• Impressions for priority query groups
• Click through rate changes on high intent queries
• Query breadth, meaning how many related queries you appear for

Query breadth is an indicator of topical authority building, not proof of it.

Page level
This shows which pages earn trust over time.

Good things to track include:
• Clicks and impressions per page
• Click through rate per page
• Average position trends
• Ranking stability, meaning how steady positions are rather than volatile

Unstable rankings often correlate with weaker authority in that SERP.

Topic level
This shows whether authority is compounding.

It’s useful to track:
• Impression growth across a topic cluster
• Query expansion, meaning ranking for terms you did not explicitly target
• Internal linking impact across related pages

These trends indicate whether search engines are increasingly associating you with a topic.

Use SERP checks to validate your data

SERP is a Search Engine Results Page.

You cannot measure SEO properly without looking at the SERP itself. The SERP shows what Google believes the searcher wants at that moment.

So, check:
• Whether your content type matches what ranks
• Whether SERP features absorb clicks
• Whether you are competing with publishers, vendors, or communities

Reality check
If metrics look healthy but prospects do not convert, you may be winning visibility for the wrong intent.

Connect Search Console to GA4 to measure behaviour

GA4, Google Analytics 4, measures what people do after they land on your site.

This is where SEO begins to connect to observable outcomes.

Key terms to understand.

Conversion
A conversion is a tracked action that matters commercially, such as a demo request or pricing page view.

Attribution
Attribution is how credit for a conversion is assigned across touchpoints.

Assisted conversions and why they matter in B2B

An assisted conversion is when organic search helps move a prospect towards a conversion, even though it was not the final interaction before they converted.

In plain English, SEO helped, but it did not get the credit.

This happens because most analytics tools default to last click attribution, which only gives credit to the final touchpoint. In B2B, that final touchpoint is often direct traffic, email, paid media, or sales outreach.

A simple example makes this clearer.

A prospect searches for a problem they are trying to understand and finds your content via organic search. They read it, learn something, and start to trust your thinking. Days or weeks later, they return via a branded search, a LinkedIn post, or a sales email and request a demo.

In that journey, organic search played a critical role, but it was not the last click. That initial organic visit is recorded as an assist, not a conversion.

This is why SEO often shows up as an assisted conversion in B2B. Prospects use search to research, learn, and validate long before they are ready to act. By the time they convert, they already know who you are.

Reality check
If you only measure last click conversions, you will almost always undervalue SEO in B2B. Assisted conversions are where SEO’s real influence usually shows up.

Be honest about CRM and pipeline influence

SEO rarely closes deals directly in B2B.

Its value more often shows up as
• Better educated prospects
• Higher quality conversations
• Improved sales velocity
• Increased deal confidence

If organic search never appears in assisted conversions or influenced pipeline, either SEO is underperforming or tracking is incomplete. And that’s an important distinction for you to bear in mind.

Metrics that can misdirect us

If you want to spot misleading reporting quickly, it often includes:
• Vanity ranking snapshots without context
• Total organic traffic without intent segmentation
• Single KPI SEO scorecards
• Last click only conversion reporting

They may make us feel better and be easier for other stakeholders to understand, but they will not be optimal.

Tools that help

Here’s some tools that I use:

Google Search Console for visibility and authority signals.
GA4 for behaviour and conversion analysis.
Looker Studio for combining data sources into one narrative.
Ahrefs or Semrush for competitive context and ranking stability.

But remember, tools cannot tell you what to be known for and can’t judge a propsect’s trust. That’s all done to you!

The simple rule to remember

If your SEO reporting would impress someone who does not understand your prospects or your revenue model, it is probably not the reporting your business needs. Its too complicated and too nuanced for that.

Measure visibility first, then trust, then commercial impact. In that order.

Call to action

If we are serious about measuring SEO success in B2B marketing, it’s important we don’t hide behind rankings.

A good plan would be to pick three topics you want to be known for. Track impressions, click through rate, query breadth, and ranking stability for those topics. Then connect Search Console to GA4 and define conversions that reflect real prospect intent, not vanity engagement. Learn and refine as you go.

If you want help building an SEO measurement framework that senior stakeholders will respect, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

man looking at blueprints

How to structure content so authority compounds

One of the reasons B2B content underperforms is not quality it is structure. Or lack of it.

Content teams can product useful, sensible, very good content. But because it is scattered, disconnected, or constantly changing direction, topical authority never compounds i.e. there is a bigger picture that needs to be realised over time, reinforcing the same ideas repeatedly over time.

There are quite a few technical terms but I’ll do my best to break them down and explain them clearly as we go.

Start with buyer problems, not content formats

I’ve seen so many content strategies start with formats like blogs, guides, videos, or white papers. But that is backwards.

Authority compounds when content is organised around buyer problems, meaning the real challenges buyers are trying to solve, not the assets marketing wants to produce.

This matters because topical authority is built when search engines repeatedly see your site addressing the same problem space clearly and consistently.

Topical authority simply means how strongly your website is associated with a specific subject. In plain English, do search engines believe you genuinely know what you are talking about?

Reality check
I like to be really binary. If a piece of content does not clearly reinforce one of your core buyer problems, do not publish it.

Decide what you are building authority around

You cannot build authority around everything. It’s just too hard and none of us are blessed with the resources required. Unless you’re extremely lucky, you have to choose.

So, focus becomes a technical decision, not a creative one.

When teams publish across too many topics, they dilute entity association, which is how search engines connect your brand name with specific concepts over time.

Entity association means that when your brand appears online, it repeatedly shows up in connection with the same ideas. That repetition is how recognition forms.

Reality check
If a new topic does not strengthen an existing authority area, it weakens your overall signal.

Understand the role of a core page

For each problem you choose to focus on, there should be a core page, sometimes called a pillar page.

A core page is the main page that defines the problem, sets shared language, and anchors your point of view.

Its job is to:
• Explain the problem clearly in everyday language
• Define key terms and concepts
• Outline approaches, trade-offs, and options
• Reflect how buyers actually think

Search engines use this page as a reference point when it is reinforced correctly.

Reality check
If you cannot point to the core page a piece of content supports, your structure is already breaking.

Supporting pages exist to answer specific questions

Once a core page exists, you create supporting pages.

Supporting pages answer specific buyer questions, objections, comparisons, or implementation concerns related to the core problem.

This structure creates semantic overlap, which means multiple pages on your site cover closely related questions using similar language and concepts.

Semantic overlap helps search engines understand that your site understands a topic in depth rather than mentioning it once.

Each supporting page should clearly relate back to the core problem. If it does not strengthen the core page, it should not exist.

Internal linking reinforces meaning, not just rankings

Internal linking is often treated as a technical SEO task. It is actually a meaning signal.

Internal linking is the practice of linking from one page on your site to another. When done deliberately, it tells search engines
• Which pages matter most
• How concepts relate to each other
• Which topics you consider authoritative

A strong internal linking structure:
• Links supporting pages back to the core page
• Links laterally between closely related questions
• Uses consistent, buyer aligned language

This reinforces topical authority and entity association at the same time.

Avoid keyword cannibalisation by managing intent

Keyword cannibalisation happens when multiple pages on your site target the same search intent, meaning the same underlying goal of the searcher.

Search intent might be learning, comparing, validating, or deciding.

The fix is simple
• One page per intent

If two pages answer the same question for the same reader at the same stage, they compete.

Cannibalisation is usually a structural problem, not a keyword problem.

The fastest ways to kill compounding authority

If you want to undo progress quickly, these are the most reliable ways.

• Rebranding language every year
• Restarting content themes with each new CMO (and we know how short their tenures are)
• Publishing for internal politics rather than buyer problems (especially egotistic service line heads)
• Letting the content calendar dictate strategy
• Launching new topic areas before existing ones mature

One way to think about it is that these behaviours reset any authority you had building.

How to know when a topic is complete enough

Many teams abandon topics too early.

A topic is usually complete enough when:
• You rank for a wide range of related queries
• Search impressions grow without new optimisation
• Sales teams use multiple pieces in live deals
• New content adds marginal value rather than new ground

At this point, content maintenance matters more than expansion.

Content maintenance means updating language, consolidating overlap, and strengthening internal links.

How structure changes SERP behaviour

As topical authority increases, you will see changes in SERP (Search Engine Results Page) behaviour, meaning how your pages perform in search results.

These include:
• Faster ranking velocity, meaning new pages rank more quickly
• Greater ranking stability, meaning positions fluctuate less
• Query expansion, meaning you rank for terms you did not explicitly target
• Reduced reliance on heavy optimisation

This is how authority shows up before obvious wins.

The simple rule to remember

SEO rewards authority.
Authority compounds through structure.

Without structure, effort resets.
With structure, effort compounds.

If your content library does not make it obvious what you are known for, neither search engines nor prospective clients will work it out for you.

Tools that help observe authority building

As you’d expect, there’s tools out there to help you observe patterns.

Google Search Console shows query breadth, impressions, and early authority signals.
Ahrefs or Semrush help analyse topical coverage and competitor visibility.
Crawlers like Screaming Frog reveal whether internal linking reinforces structure.
Brand monitoring tools help track entity association beyond links.

Just be cautious and don’t rely on them too much. Tools cannot tell you what to be known for. They cannot judge prospect trust. They support judgement, not replace it.

Call to action

If you want your content to actually build authority, stop asking what to publish next and start asking what you are reinforcing.

Write down the buyer problems you want to be known for solving. Then map your existing content against them. If most of it does not clearly support those problems, authority will not compound.

Focus on fewer topics. Build depth. Structure deliberately.

If you want help turning your content into a system that compounds authority rather than scattering it, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

man building google ranking authority

How to build authority that actually helps you win keywords

As always, I like to be clear on what the key word in the question means.

Authority is a trust signal inferred over time, not something assigned or scored in isolation. And search engines and AI platforms infer authority by observing patterns across many signals.

Those patterns include:
• Depth and consistency of coverage around a topic
• Repeated association between your brand and specific concepts
• External references that reinforce that association
• Long term performance stability in search results
• Signals that correlate with trust and usefulness

SEO tools try to approximate these signals and search engines infer them directly by observing behaviour and outcomes at scale.

The three types of authority that matter in B2B

To make authority actionable, I think it helps to separate it into three layers:

Domain authority
Overall trust in your site and brand. This affects how easily new pages can rank at all.

Topical authority
How strongly your site is associated with a specific subject. In B2B, this is usually the most important layer.

Brand authority
Whether buyers and the wider market recognise your name in connection with a problem or solution, independent of your website.

Most B2B teams struggle because they chase domain authority when what they actually need is topical and brand authority first. Hopefully you just experienced a lightbulb moment.  

How search engines infer topical authority

This is where hopefully we can stop being abstract.

Search engines infer topical authority by looking for reinforcement across multiple related signals, not a single page.

These include
• The breadth of related queries your site ranks for
• Consistent internal linking between pages on the same theme
• Semantic overlap across content answering adjacent questions
• External references that mention your brand in topical context
• Stable visibility across related searches over time

So basically, one good page can get you noticed whilst a connected set of good pages tells search engines you know the subject. And it’s safe to infer that isolated content rarely builds lasting authority.

Why most B2B content does not build authority

Publishing content does not automatically build authority. Some many companies pump out volumes of ‘stuff’ and look extremely busy but, to a critical eye, it’s riddled with missteps.

Common mistakes include:
• Writing across too many topics with no depth
• Publishing content to satisfy keyword lists rather than buyer questions
• Treating each page as an isolated SEO asset
• Constantly switching focus before authority compounds
• Producing content sales teams never use

Authority comes from coherence and repetition, not volume.

Authority is built outside SEO before it shows up in SEO

This is an uncomfortable truth:

In B2B, authority usually forms first through
• Sales conversations and lived experience
• Thought leadership in trusted environments
• Partnerships, associations and ecosystems
• Analyst, peer and industry recognition

SEO becomes effective when it reflects something that already exists and rarely creates authority on its own.

How to build topical authority deliberately

Topical authority is the most controllable form of authority for B2B marketers.

A deliberate approach could look like this:
• Choose a small number of problems you want to be known for solving
• Map the full set of buyer questions around those problems
• Get the team creating content that answers those questions clearly and consistently
• Reinforce those ideas through intentional internal linking
• Maintain focus long enough for patterns to emerge

For me, with tenures so low in B2B marketing, I always think of ‘plant trees whose shade you know you may never sit in’. The results will come but how fast only the Google Gods know.

Why backlinks still matter

Some people like to think of backlinks as 'up votes' but they are closer to contextual endorsements.

In B2B, the links that matter most:
• Sit within relevant editorial or industry context
• Reinforce your association with a topic
• Come from sources buyers already trust
• Accumulate naturally over time

Search engines also appear to observe repeated brand mentions and citations, especially when they reinforce topical relevance.

How authority changes SERP behaviour

This is a critical but often missed point.

As authority increases, you will see:
• New pages ranking faster with less optimisation
• Pages entering more competitive Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs)
• Rankings becoming more stable, not volatile
• Google favouring your pages over technically similar competitors

How sales accelerate authority if you let it

Talking with actual clients and directly with sales teams always surfaces the strongest authority signals available. I get so frustrated when marketers do not take the path of least resistance to driving context, speak to clients. It makes our lives so much easier.

Repeated objections, explanations and buyer questions show exactly where trust needs to be built. So, as marketers, if we can turn that into clear explanations, confident points of view and practical guidance, content becomes powerful proof. When sales actually use that content in prospecting and live deals, marketing benefits from authority uplifts and everything compounds faster.

How to tell authority is growing before rankings move

Better experts than I say that they can see authority groing before seeing the impact in rankings.

Early signals include:
• Ranking for a wider range of related queries
• Rising impressions without major optimisation changes
• Gradual, stable ranking improvements rather than spikes
• Stronger internal linking impact
• Content being referenced in sales conversations

So we can be confident that rankings lag authority. Waiting for position one in Google rankings to validate progress is a mistake… and its important for us to be able to articulate this point to any dismissive internal stakeholders.

The simple rule to remember

SEO rewards authority.
Authority is inferred from consistent, credible presence.
Presence is earned by being genuinely useful.

If you want to win harder keywords, we need to build the reputation that deserves them first.

Tools that actually help with authority building

Tools do not create authority, but they can help you observe signals, spot patterns, and avoid guessing. Used properly, they support judgement rather than replace it.

Google Search Console
Essential for understanding query breadth, impression growth, and early authority signals before rankings move.

Ahrefs or Semrush
Useful for analysing topical coverage, competitor visibility, and how authority distributes across pages rather than chasing single keywords.

Screaming Frog or similar crawlers
Helps diagnose internal linking strength and whether your content structure actually reinforces topical authority.

Brand monitoring tools
Useful for spotting mentions, citations and external references that reinforce authority beyond links.

The rule with tools is simple. If they help you see patterns, use them. If they push you toward volume and vanity metrics, have some discipline and hold yourself back.

Call to action

If you are serious about winning the keywords that matter in B2B, stop asking what to publish next and start asking what you want to be known for.

Write down the problems your best buyers trust you to help them solve. Then look honestly at your content, your sales conversations and your external presence. Because if those things are fragmented, authority will be too.

Focus on fewer topics. Go deeper. Reinforce your point of view everywhere it matters.

If you want help turning this into a deliberate authority building strategy that supports SEO, sales and long-term growth, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like

 

lady holding SEO trophy aloft

How to decide which keywords are worth winning

Before we dive into this topic how to decide which keywords are worth winning, I think it’s worth being clear what ‘winning’ actually means in B2B marketing. It doesn’t necessarily mean owning the Search Engine Results Page…or capturing every single click.

In our world, just having more than our fair share of visibility is usually enough. The goal is to be consistently present, credible, and influential for the prospective clients that matter, not to dominate traffic charts.

I think the average marketer on the street feels that winning is ranking number one for a broad head term, generating lots of traffic and being competitors for every industry related keywords.

But winning is probably more like showing up reliably during buyer research, being able to support live sales conversations, having and owning a point of view that prospective clients may trust and, overall, improving pipeline quality.

If ranking does not help any of that, it is not a win.

Start with what you already rank for

Before deciding what you could win, it’s good practice to understand what you already own.

Most B2B websites already rank for far more queries than teams realise. Not just headline keywords, but dozens or hundreds of related terms that show how search engines already understand (or not) your relevance and authority.

This baseline matters because:
• It shows where you already have credibility to build on
• It reveals near win opportunities
• It prevents duplicated effort across similar topics
• It grounds decisions in reality

The four things that must stack up

To win a keyword in B2B, four conditions need to broadly stack up.

• Authority
• Intent alignment
• Content advantage
• Commercial relevance

You do not need all four to be perfect. But if one is missing entirely, you are unlikely to win in any meaningful way.

Keyword difficulty is context, not a decision

Keyword difficulty is one of the most misunderstood SEO metrics.

Most tools calculate difficulty by analysing the authority and backlink profiles of pages currently ranking. It tells you how strong the competition is, not whether you should compete.

Difficulty does not tell you:
• Whether the keyword is worth winning
• How long it will take to rank
• Whether ranking will support revenue

Treat difficulty as context. Never as a green or red light.

Step 1. Compare your authority honestly

Look at the pages currently ranking and ask
• Are these global publishers, niche specialists, or vendors?
• How strong are their domains compared to yours?
• Do they have deep topical authority or general strength?

If the SERP is dominated by brands with fundamentally stronger authority than you, the honest answer to can we realistically earn a fair share of visibility here is usually no.

Step 2. Decide if this is a domain or page level battle

Not all keywords require the same level of authority.

A simple rule helps
• If the SERP is dominated by broad category pages, this is a domain level battle
• If it is dominated by specific guides or explainers, it is more likely a page level battle

This is why narrow, intent rich keywords are often more realistic targets in B2B.

If winning this keyword would require your entire domain to outrank brands it has never realistically competed with before, SEO is not the right lever today and the topic needs broader marketing and brand work first.
If winning depends on one strong page answering an unmet need better than what exists, this is a realistic SEO opportunity.

Step 3. Decide if you can genuinely create something better

This is not about writing more words.

Ask
• Can we explain this more clearly than what already exists?
• Can we add insight competitors cannot?
• Can we reflect real buyer questions and objections?
• Can we bring first-hand experience, data, or a usable framework?

If the only advantage you can articulate is that your content will be more comprehensive, you probably do not have a real advantage.

Search engines really like to reward usefulness, not effort.

Step 4. Assess backlink reality, not backlink theory

Backlinks still matter. But in B2B, they are about credibility, not scale.

Ask
• Do the top-ranking pages have strong editorial or industry links?
• Are those links earned through expertise or just volume?
• Can we realistically earn comparable references over time?

If winning requires link tactics that only work as long as nobody asks how they are done, walk away.

Sustainable rankings come from authority, partnerships, and trust maintained over a period of time.

Step 5. Factor in time to value

Timing also matters.

Ask:
• How long would this realistically take to rank?
• Does that timeline align with business priorities?
• Will the topic still matter when we get there?

A keyword can be winnable and still be the wrong use of time. Time to value is a commercial decision, not an SEO one so this is another consideration that goes into your pot.

Step 6. Apply the B2B commercial filter

This is where SEO becomes marketing.

Ask:
• Does this keyword map to real sales conversations?
• Does it reduce friction or objections?
• Does it help buyers make decisions?
• Would sales teams actually use this content?

The three decisions every keyword must end with

I think every keyword assessment should end with one clear outcome.

• Go now
• Park it
• Walk away

“Go now” does not mean you expect to own the SERP. It means the keyword is important enough that earning a fair share of credible visibility will influence buying decisions.

Just like when sales teams are deciding to ‘no bid’ an RFP that has come their way…A well-reasoned ‘no’ is often the most valuable SEO decision a B2B marketing team can make.

Common mistakes

Most failures that I've seen over the years fall into three categories.

Metric led mistakes
• Treating difficulty scores as decision makers
• Prioritising volume over intent

Authority blind mistakes
• Assuming good content can overcome any SERP
• Underestimating entrenched competitors

Commercial blind mistakes
• Chasing visibility instead of influence
• Ignoring how sales will actually use the content

Key buzzwords explained

• Keyword difficulty, an estimate of competition strength
• Domain authority, trust built across topics
• Page authority, strength of one page for one query
• Topical authority, credibility built through depth
• Commercial relevance, whether ranking influences revenue reality

Why this matters even more now

The same signals that determine who ranks also influence how AI tools summarise, recommend, and describe brands.

AI systems do not reward dominance. They reward repeated, credible presence across related topics. If you cannot win trust in a SERP, AI systems are unlikely to surface you accurately or at all.

Call to action

If you are serious about making SEO work in B2B, stop asking whether a keyword looks attractive and start try diving deeper to ask whether it is even worth winning.

Write down the keywords your team is currently targeting. Then assess each one honestly.

• Do we already have, or can we realistically earn, a fair share of visibility on this topic?
• Do we have the authority to compete?
• Does the intent match how we sell?
• Would ranking actually help revenue?

If you want an external contractor or agency to help you decide which keywords are winnable, and for the right reasons, get in touch and we will personally introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

a guy searching on google with a magnifying glass

How to analyse SERP to improve your rankings

Very few marketers actually analyse the SERP properly.

Instead, they look at a keyword in a tool, see search volume and a difficulty score, assume it is worth targeting, and only realise too late that the content never had a chance. It ranks badly or worse it ranks fine but attracts the wrong audience.

I’ve certainly been guilty of skipping SERP analysis in the past too. 

What is a SERP analysis

SERP means Search Engine Results Page. It is the page Google shows after a search.

SERP analysis is the process of manually reviewing that page to understand what Google believes the searcher wants and what type of content satisfies that intent.

This is not an SEO hygiene task. It is more impactful than that.

Many SERPs are winnable. Very few are worth winning. But if you ignore you are competing with Google’s interpretation of the query. And you’ll lose.

When to do it

You should conduct the analysis before you commit to anything.

Specifically:
• Before choosing a primary keyword
• Before writing a content brief
• Before updating an existing page
• Before assuming a keyword is commercially valuable

If you analyse everything after publishing, you are already too late.

What to check every time:
• Dominant intent
• Dominant format
• Dominant angle
• Who is winning
• SERP features present
• Winnable vs worth winning decision

If you cannot confidently answer each of these, you still have work to do.

Step 1. Search the keywords manually

Do not rely on tool screenshots. Search the keyword yourself. Put the graft in.

Use an incognito browser to reduce personalisation and check the correct location and language where relevant.

Your job here is not to admire results. It is to diagnose intent.

Step 2. Identify the dominant search intent

Search intent is the reason behind the query. What the user is trying to achieve.

Look at the top results and decide which intent dominates
• Informational, definitions, explanations, how to guides
• Commercial investigation, comparisons, best lists, alternatives
• Transactional, product pages, category pages, pricing
• Navigational, brand or product name searches

If most results are guides, the intent is informational.
If most results are comparisons, the intent is evaluative.
If most results are product pages, the intent is closer to purchase.

Trying to rank the wrong type of page against the dominant intent is the fastest way to waste effort.

Step 3. Confirm the winning format

Intent tells you what the user wants. Format tells you how they want it delivered.

Check whether the top results are dominated by
• Long form guides
• Short definitions
• List posts
• Tools or calculators
• Product or category pages
• Videos

If one format dominates, it is part of the intent. You can improve on it. You shouldn’t really ignore it.

Some common mistakes:
• Targeting the wrong intent by building a product or service page where the SERP clearly rewards educational content, or vice versa
• Relying too heavily on keyword metrics like volume or difficulty instead of what the results page is actually showing
• Treating keyword tools as the strategy rather than a validation step
• Over prioritising high volume terms that are dominated by powerful brands or irrelevant formats
• Ignoring intent rich long tail queries that align far more closely with real buyer questions and decision stages

I have also seen teams walk away from attractive looking keywords after SERP analysis and instead focus on narrower, intent rich queries that generated real inbound enquiries.

One company I worked with in the Capital Markets sector spotted an opportunity around administration for SPACs(Special Purpose Acquisition Companies). The search volume was low and most SEO tools would have dismissed it immediately.

But the SERP told a different story.

The topic was emerging, the intent was commercial, the competition was weak, and from a service delivery point of view it was highly profitable. They focused on it deliberately and owned it.

At one point they were winning around 90 percent of SPAC deals in Europe, and journalists researching the topic started contacting them directly for interviews.

Low traffic. Massive impact.

That is what good SERP analysis looks like in the real world.

Step 4. Identify the dominant angle

Most SERPs also have a clear angle. This is the framing that repeats across top results.

Examples include
• For enterprise teams
• For beginners
• Fastest approach
• Cheapest options
• Best tools for a specific use case

Scan titles and headings. If several results repeat the same framing, Google is rewarding that angle.

Your goal is not to be different for the sake of it. It is to be clearer, more useful, or more relevant to your buyers.

Step 5. Assess who you are competing with

Now look at who is ranking.

Ask
• Are major publishers dominating
• Are vendors dominating
• Are niche specialists winning
• Are directories or communities present

This tells you how hard the SERP will be to break into and what level of authority is expected.

It’s best to be really subjective at this stage. Some SERPs are technically winnable but commercially pointless.

Step 6. Pay attention to SERP features

SERPs are no longer ten blue links.

Look for features like
• Featured snippets
• People Also Ask boxes
• Video carousels
• AI generated summaries where present

These features reveal what users want to know next and how Google prefers to surface answers. They can also reduce click through even if you rank well.

Step 7. Estimate traffic potential, not just search volume

Search volume is a directional estimate for one term. It is often misleading.

Traffic potential is the broader opportunity for one page to rank across many related queries.

In B2B marketing, relevance and commercial value matter more than big numbers.

Step 8. Make the decision

Every SERP analysis should end with one clear decision being made:
• Build content now
• Park it and revisit later
• Walk away entirely

Once this decision is made, it should be locked. Do not reopen intent or format later to suit opinions or internal politics.

This is why SERP analysis can be considered to have strategic vlaue, not just another SEO task.

Tools that help

It’s so easy for marketers to fall into the trap of running straight to sign up for cloud-based tools but we have to realise that they support SERP analysis, they don’t actually perform it.  

Useful ones include
• Google Search Console for real queries you already appear for
• Ahrefs for SERP comparison, traffic potential and competitor context
• Semrush for intent signals, SERP features and keyword gap analysis

If you do not do manual SERP analysis, no tool will magically save you.

Key buzzwords explained

• SERP, the results page Google shows
• SERP analysis, reviewing that page to understand intent and competition
• Search intent, what the searcher is trying to achieve
• Content format, the type of page Google is rewarding
• Angle, the framing repeated across top results
• Traffic potential, the broader traffic a page could earn

Why SERP analysis matters even more now

The same SERP signals that shape rankings also influence how AI tools summarise topics and recommend brands.

AI systems amplify SERP misunderstandings. They do not correct them.

Call to action

If you want better results from SEO and content, analyse the SERP before you write anything.

Pick one keyword you are targeting right now. Search it. Study the first page honestly.

Ask yourself
• Does our content match the dominant intent?
• Are we using the format the SERP rewards?
• Do we have a genuinely stronger angle?
• Is this SERP even worth winning for our business?

If you want help building SERP analysis into your keyword and content process, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

 

A woman with a magnifying glass looking into a treasure chest

How to do keyword research

Keyword research is one of the easiest ways for B2B marketing teams to waste time without realising it.

Bad keyword research creates content that ranks but does not convert, traffic that looks good in reports but goes nowhere, and frustrates CMOs that suspected there was a disconnect between writing for SEO and what we actually needed to write. I know, because I’ve been there.

So it's not an SEO problem. It is a keyword research problem.

Step 1. Start with buyer questions, not tools

A keyword is simply the phrase someone types into a search engine. In B2B marketing, those phrases usually reflect a question, a concern, or a decision being made by a committee of different stakeholders.

Before you open a tool, pull real language from real conversations:

  • Sales calls, discovery notes, objections, competitor comparisons

  • Customer success and support tickets, onboarding questions, renewal risk

  • RFP documents and lost deal notes

  • Internal Slack messages that start with “Does anyone know…”

  • And the absolute nirvana, talk to clients! Yes, even you marketers!

Those who follow me know I get very frustrated with marketers that don’t talk to clients as much as possible. This is a scenario where it helps, so, so much.

Turn that into a list of buyer questions in plain English. Buyer language, not your product language.

Step 2. Translate questions into intent

Search intent is the reason behind a search. What the buyer is trying to do?

In B2B marketing, intent usually falls into these buckets:
• Problem understanding, what is this, why is it happening
• Solution exploration, what are the options, what approaches exist
• Comparison, alternatives, best tools, vendor shortlists
• Validation, proof, pricing, implementation, risk, reviews, case studies

Do not treat all keywords equally. Two phrases can look similar but signal totally different intent.

It is also worth remembering that the same keywords, topics and intent signals now shape how AI tools summarise, recommend and describe your brand, not just how you rank in Google.

Step 3. Do SERP analysis, every time

SERP means Search Engine Results Page. It is the page Google shows after a search. SERP analysis is manually reviewing that page to understand what Google believes the searcher wants.

This step is non-negotiable.

For every priority keyword, search it and answer these questions:
• What intent is Google rewarding here, education, comparison, or purchase focused
• What format wins, guides, list posts, product pages, category pages, tools, videos
• Who is ranking, publishers, vendors, communities, directories
• What angles keep repeating, definitions, templates, pricing, pros and cons
• What is missing, what could you say better or more clearly

If your planned content does not match the intent and format of the SERP, you are not competing with competitors. You are competing with Google’s interpretation of the query. You will lose.

Step 4. Use tools to expand and validate, not to decide

Tools are essential, but they are not the strategy. Use them to expand your list, validate language, and understand competitive context.

Here are the tools most B2B teams actually use, and what each is good for:

Google Search Console: Use it to see the real queries that already drive impressions and clicks to your site. This is buyer language you have already earned. It can be clunky, but you’ll soon find the stats you need.

Google autocomplete and People Also Ask: Use them to discover how buyers phrase questions and what related questions cluster around a topic.

Ahrefs: Use it for keyword discovery, SERP comparison, and concepts like parent topics and traffic potential. It is strong for understanding what one page could realistically rank for, not just one keyword.

Semrush: Use it for keyword expansion and competitor analysis, especially keyword gap analysis. Keyword gap means identifying keywords competitors rank for that you do not.

Keyword Insights: Use it to group large keyword lists into topic clusters and reduce the risk of cannibalisation.

Two important terms to keep straight:
• Search volume is an estimate of how often a keyword is searched. It is directional, not precise. In our B2B world, low volume often means high value.
• Keyword difficulty is a tool generated estimate of ranking difficulty. Useful for context, not a decision maker.

Step 5. Consider topic clusters to avoid cannibalisation

Sorry, we’re getting a bit technical and buzzword heavy. I’ll try and keep things simple and high level. A topic cluster is a structured set of pages around one core theme. It usually includes:
• A core page that covers the main topic
• Supporting pages that answer specific questions
• Comparison pages for alternatives and evaluation
• Validation pages like case studies, implementation, pricing, and risk

Keyword cannibalisation happens when multiple pages on your site target the same intent and compete with each other. That splits authority and confuses search engines.

A simple rule helps: one page per intent. If two pages are trying to answer the same question for the same reader at the same stage, consolidate or reposition.

Step 6. Prioritise like a true B2B marketer

This is where I see most teams going wrong. They prioritise by search volume because it is easy to sort in a spreadsheet. And it looks quite exciting, seeing the volume of all those relevant key terms… “ooh, look at the traffic we can get”.

Instead, prioritise using commercial relevance. Commercial relevance means how closely a keyword maps to revenue, buying decisions, or real sales conversations.

Use this filter:
• Does this map to a real sales question or objection?
• Is the intent aligned with how we sell?
• Can we realistically win this SERP based on what is ranking today?
• If we rank, does it help pipeline quality, sales velocity, or deal confidence?

A keyword can be high volume and still be a waste of time. A keyword can be low volume (especially comparing b2c with b2b) and still influences serious revenue. Your business likely has its niches and plenty of opportunity to own them.

Step 7. Define what success looks like

If you measure success only by rankings, you will optimise for the wrong outcomes.

In B2B marketing, good keyword research shows up as:
• Better quality inbound conversations
• Content being used by sales in live deals
• Fewer late stage objections because buyers are educated earlier
• Clearer alignment between marketing language and buyer language
• A topic footprint that grows, not random one off pages

Rankings are useful signals. They are not the goal.

Key buzzwords, translated

Here are those basic terms I threw around and what they mean in plain English:
• Keyword, the phrase someone searches
• Search intent, what they are trying to achieve
• SERP, what Google shows for that search
• SERP analysis, reading the SERP to validate intent and format
• Search volume, estimated demand, directional
• Keyword difficulty, estimated competition, directional
• Topic cluster, a structured set of pages around one topic
• Cannibalisation, your pages competing with each other
• Keyword gap, what competitors rank for that you do not
• Commercial relevance, whether the keyword connects to revenue reality

Call to action

If you are serious about making keyword research work in B2B, start with the fundamentals.

Write down the questions your buyers actually ask before they buy. Not keywords. Questions.

Then read your existing content honestly.

If it does not answer those questions clearly, no amount of optimisation will save it. And please don’t leave it to the person responsible for SEO…those b2b marketers with the most context must weigh in and help…and they must also not simply overrule the person responsible for SEO… team work makes the dream work.

Next, think in terms of commercial relevance, not just search volume. The best B2B marketing teams can answer questions like:

• Which keywords map to real sales conversations?
• Where does intent actually increase?
• Which terms help buyers make decisions, not just browse?
• How does our content support sales credibility?

If you want help turning this into a clear, prioritised keyword strategy that actually supports revenue, get in touch and we will introduce you to people who genuinely know what good looks like.

an hipster SEO wizard

How to create a backlink strategy

Most people know that backlinks matter. Most B2B marketers have been told for years that they are a core SEO signal. The problem is that many backlink strategies are still built for a world of high volume traffic, short buying cycles and mass audiences.

That is not the world most B2B marketers operate in.

Our audiences are smaller. Buying cycles are longer. Credibility matters more than clicks. And sales are always part of the equation whether marketing likes it or not.

Which is why a B2B backlink strategy cannot just be a scaled down version of consumer SEO. It needs to be more deliberate, more selective and far more aligned to how trust is built in a category.

Stop treating backlinks as a tactic

The biggest mistake I see in B2B marketing is treating backlinks as an SEO task rather than a strategic signal.

Links should not be the goal. They should be the by product.

Search engines and AI systems no longer just count links. They interpret them. They look at context, relevance, intent and whether the linking content is actually useful to real people.

This is the thinking behind going beyond the backlink. A link only matters because of what it says about your credibility, not because it exists.

Once we accept that, the conversation changes from how do we get more links to why would anyone credible want to reference us at all.

Decide what you want to be trusted for

Before you build anything, be clear about what role backlinks are meant to play in your marketing strategy.

Are you trying to
• Be recognised as an authority in a specific niche
• Support a small number of high value service or product pages
• Build credibility in front of buyers before they ever speak to sales
• Reinforce your position with analysts, partners or industry bodies

If you cannot answer this, backlink activity becomes random. You have probably heard me mention random acts of marketing before. They may make us look busy, but they rarely deliver much commercial value.

It is fine for B2B backlink strategies to be opinionated. In fact, they should be. They reflect how the business wants to be perceived, not just what an SEO tool suggests.

Where backlink strategy actually sits in B2B marketing

In B2B, backlink strategy should not live in an SEO silo.

It sits at the intersection of
• Content marketing
• PR and communications
• Brand positioning
• Sales credibility

This is why the strongest B2B backlinks often come from industry publications, analyst commentary, research citations, association sites and trusted partners.

They take more effort to earn, but they provide value for years. And they do more than help rankings. They make sales conversations easier. They reduce perceived risk. They give prospective clients reassurance that you are a safe choice to consider.

What actually makes a backlink valuable in B2B

Not all backlinks are equal and this matters even more in B2B where volumes are lower.

A valuable B2B backlink usually
• Comes from a site your buyers already trust
• Is clearly relevant to your category or problem space
• Sits naturally within editorial content
• Has the potential to influence perception even if it never drives significant traffic

One link from a respected industry publication can do more for a B2B brand than fifty generic placements. Not just for SEO, but for credibility across the funnel.

Build link worthy content on purpose

If you want backlinks, your content has to earn them.

In B2B, that usually means
• Original research that gives others something to cite
• Clear explainers that simplify complex topics
• Strong points of view that help people frame decisions
• Practical frameworks that sales teams and buyers can actually use

Thin blogs written to keep a content calendar alive rarely earn links. Neither does content that tries to sound clever instead of useful. And content produced purely for scale, including a lot of low effort AI output, does not help either.

A simple test applies here. Would a credible industry voice reference this in their own work. If not, it will not attract meaningful backlinks.

Use digital PR as a growth lever, not a bolt on

Some of the strongest B2B backlinks today come from digital PR.

Journalists, editors and industry publishers are constantly looking for credible insight, data and commentary. When your content genuinely helps them do their job, they will link to your site.

This is where backlink strategy, brand building and authority start to overlap. You are not just earning links. You are shaping how your company is talked about in your market.

That is far more valuable than any directory listing. I despise those. What a nonsense.

What most B2B backlink strategies get wrong

This is where many teams fall down.

Most B2B backlink strategies fail because they
• Chase volume instead of relevance
• Optimise for SEO metrics instead of buyer trust
• Sit in an SEO silo disconnected from PR and brand
• Focus on links that do nothing to help sales conversations
• Look for quick wins instead of compounding credibility

Buying links or gaming placements might deliver short term movement, but it does not build anything durable and can cause headaches every time algorithms change, which is often.

Backlinks only work when they reflect real authority.

Measure impact, not activity

In B2B, the right questions are
• Are these links improving how buyers perceive us
• Are they supporting visibility around topics we care about
• Are sales teams using these sources to build credibility
• Are they contributing to long term authority in the category

A good backlink strategy improves confidence with humans as well as algorithms. If it does not do both, it is probably underperforming.

Call to action

If you only do five things this quarter, do these.

• Decide what you want to be known for
• Create one genuinely link worthy asset
• Focus on getting that asset cited in the right places
• Invest in learning so you understand what good looks like
• Talk to good SEO agencies, even if only to stay close to current thinking

That alone will outperform most scattergun backlink campaigns.

If you want help making this happen, feel free to get in touch and we will introduce you to agencies that genuinely know their stuff.

A sign showing old seo and a man on a steam train, opposite a screen with AI future and an astronout

How to make your company appear in AI search results

This is now one of the most common questions I hear from b2b marketers.

Not: How do I rank on Google?

Not: What keywords should we target?

But: Why does ChatGPT mention them and not us?

So let me answer it properly. As it currently stands.

In short
To appear in AI search results your company needs:
• Content that answers real questions clearly
• A distinct point of view repeated consistently
• Visibility in places AI already trusts

Why AI search changes the rules

Ask a question in ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity or Claude and something fundamental has changed.

You are not shown ten options. You are given one assembled answer.

If your company is not part of that answer you effectively do not exist in that moment. And that moment is now how buyers, especially the younger generation, increasingly conduct their research.

This isn't a prediction. It is already happening.

How AI search actually works

AI powered search tools do not rank pages in the traditional sense.

  • They generate answers based on patterns they have learned over time. Those patterns come from

  • Content that clearly answers questions

  • Sources that are cited repeatedly

  • Language that shows up consistently

  • Brands that demonstrate authority

So the goal is no longer to rank number one for a keyword, it is be the brand AI trusts when answering a question

That is what appearing in AI search results actually means.

A simple way to think about it

SEO was about being found.
AEO is about being quoted.
GEO is about being remembered.

And this is the line I want most marketers to sit with.

If you want to appear in AI answers you need to stop writing like you want to rank and start writing like you want to be understood.

And that's quite a shift in mindset.

Does SEO still matter

Yes. But not in the way most teams are still practising it.

SEO still matters because AI systems learn from the same web your content lives on. If your site is technically broken or invisible to search engines you will struggle to be visible to AI too.

But SEO is no longer the finish line. It is the entry fee.

Ranking pages without answering questions clearly will not help you appear in AI search results. Optimising keywords without a point of view will not get you quoted. Publishing more content without clarity will not make you memorable.

Think of SEO as the foundation.
AEO is how you get used.
GEO is how you get chosen.

What AEO really means

AEO stands for Answer Engine Optimisation.

In practice it is simple. You are making it easy for AI to lift a clean accurate answer from your content without guessing.

  • Content that performs well in AI search usually has

  • Headings written as real questions

  • Direct answers in plain language

  • Clear definitions without fluff

  • Examples that remove ambiguity

If your content exists to sound impressive AI struggles to use it. If it exists to explain something clearly, AI is far more likely to reference it.

AEO is how your company gets mentioned correctly rather than vaguely or not at all.

What GEO actually does

GEO stands for Generative Engine Optimisation.

This is where long term visibility is won or lost.

AI models learn through repetition. When the same language and framing appears again and again across credible sources it becomes the default explanation.

Try this yourself. Ask ChatGPT something like: What is the best Marketing Automation software?

You will notice the same companies appear repeatedly. That is not luck. It is clarity plus consistency over time.

If ten average sites describe a category the same way AI repeats it. But if one brand consistently explains it better and shows up often enough AI learns from that instead.

GEO rewards:

  • Distinct language

  • Clear opinions

  • Repeatable ideas

  • Consistency

This is brand building for AI search whether you like the term or not.

Where AI tools actually get their information

Despite the mystique AI does not magically know things.

ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity rely heavily on:

  • Credible editorial content

  • Recognised industry publications

  • Expert commentary and interviews

  • Clear explainer pages

  • Frequently cited sources

This is why being visible in the right places matters again. Being quoted matters again. Having named expertise matters again.

A ghost written CEO post is not a strategy.

How to actually make your company appear in AI search results

Before you worry about tools or tactics answer these honestly.

• Can we explain what we do in one clear paragraph?
• Do we answer real buyer questions directly?
• Do we use the same language everywhere?
• Are we quoted anywhere that matters?

Then do the work properly.

Start with the questions you want to be known for answering.
Not keyword lists. Real uncomfortable buyer questions.

Create definitive pages:

  • What is this

  • How does it work

  • When should you use it

  • When should you not

As b2b marketers, we will have to write to explain and not to impress as AI prefers clarity over creativity.

Get quoted elsewhere: PR and expert commentary now directly influence AI visibility.

Repeat yourself deliberately: Same language. Same framing. Same beliefs expressed consistently.

That is how generative AI tools learn.

The uncomfortable truth

There is no hack or quick fix despite what some of those Tik Tok influencers may try and tell you.

No plugin. No checklist. No shortcut.

If your company does not have a clear point of view AI will not invent one for you.
If your content is vague AI will look elsewhere.
If your brand is forgettable AI will move to someone else.

If AI cannot explain your company clearly that is not an AI problem, it's a problem for us as B2B marketers.

Call to action

If you are serious about showing up in AI search results start with the fundamentals.

Write down the three questions you want your company to be known for answering. Then read your website and content honestly.

If it does not answer those questions clearly neither will an AI.

Next, think in terms of measurable visibility not just content output. The brands that win with AI search can answer questions like:

• How likely is it that AI models recommend our brand over competitors?
• Where are we currently cited or mentioned and where are the gaps?
• How AI tools describe us and with what sentiment?
• How we perform across major generative systems including OpenAI, Gemini and Meta?
• How we stack up against competitors when AI answers buyer questions?

These are the signals AI systems use when deciding which brands to surface and suggest.

If you want help turning achieving all this then feel free to get in touch and we'll personally introduce you to the agencies that know their stuff.


CMO sitting at desk assessing briefs

How to avoid common mistakes when writing a marketing brief?

Over the last few decades in numerous CMO roles, I have written, received, rewritten and quietly apologised for more marketing briefs than I care to remember. I have also been on the other side of the fence, receiving briefs so poor they make me wonder if the sender should be issuing a brief to help them write a brief.

A good brief is about clarity. It exists to remove ambiguity, so the people you want to pay to solve your problems are on the same page as you and set up to succeed, in a way that you and your team actually benefit from.

In b2b marketing, most briefs start with a decision that has already been made. A campaign is needed to launch a new product. The team has decided it is finally time for marketing automation. It is time to refresh the brand identity. Somebody wants to jump on the account based marketing train. Completely normal.

The brief is not there to pretend you are starting from scratch. It is there to explain the thinking behind the decision, what you need and why, what resources you have to play with, and how you will know an agency is the right one for you. If a brief is too bad, the perfect agency might even decline to pitch in the first place, so shooting yourself in the foot.

Most bad marketing briefs are not written by bad marketers. They are written by busy people trying to move things along.

The problem is that small mistakes at the briefing stage snowball. What starts as vagueness turns into guesswork. Guesswork turns into key people being on different pages. This could lead to shoddy work. And that turns into frustration on all sides.

Like all things, everyone has their own opinion. But here are the most common mistakes I see in b2b marketing briefs.

Mistake 1. Treating the brief like admin

This is the big one. When a brief is treated as something you have to get done, rather than something that helps you think, it shows. The language is vague. The logic is loose. Key decisions are missing.

Sometimes I get the impression people think the brief is just admin that will be put right in the face to face briefing. It is not. The brief is the one truth. It is the moment you decide what you actually want and explain it clearly enough for someone else to help. If you rush it, you will pay for that later in time, money and goodwill.

Mistake 2. Pretending some decisions have not been made

Many briefs dance around reality. The business already wants a campaign. Or a new brand identity. Or outside help. Or a new direction. But the brief is written as if everything is still up for debate.

This creates confusion immediately. Agencies do not know whether they are being asked to diagnose a problem or execute a solution. Be honest. If a decision has been made, state it clearly. You have 100% decided to use Sitecore over WordPress? Say so.

Clarity is not limiting. It is invaluable.

Mistake 3. Being vague about the problem

Briefs often describe what needs to be done without explaining why. We need more awareness. We need better leads. We need to stand out. None of this helps.

What is actually not working as it should. Where are things breaking down. What prompted this brief now. Without that context, people are forced to guess at the real problem and the work will drift.

Why not help agencies by giving them valuable context upfront. Do not rely on them asking the right questions. Give them the lowdown. Give them the inside track. Proactively.

Mistake 4. Asking the work to do too many things

If your brief has ten objectives, it has none. One brief should have one main job. You can include secondary goals, but you need to be clear about what matters most and what trumps everything else if time or resources get tight.

When everything is a priority, nothing is. This is how work ends up watered down and compromised. Focus is not a nice to have. It is what makes work effective.

Mistake 5. Defining success with buzzwords

Success is often described in language that sounds impressive but means very little. And as b2b marketing people, we can be the worst offenders. Best in class. Cutting edge. Market leading. These phrases do not give anyone something to aim for.

Describe success in plain English. What needs to happen for you to know this project has been successful. What about from your stakeholders’ perspective.

Ideally the metrics are quantifiable. At a minimum, they should be SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound. If you cannot explain success clearly, you will struggle to recognise it when it happens, praise those who delivered it, or hold people and agencies accountable if it did not.

Mistake 6. Rubbish personas

Everyone is not a target audience. And neither is a rubbish persona.

I am generally alarmed at how bad b2b marketing people are at personas. I have seen personas cross my desk with entirely useless traits, like they have three kids, like skiing, reading books and eating Mars bars. That is a real example. It serves no purpose. It fools nobody. More importantly, it adds nothing to the brief or the outcome.

An agency will never know your customers as well as you do. Good personas help them make better decisions on your behalf. Focus on what matters. What job titles buy your services. What pressures are they under. What does success look like for them. What do they fear. What do they need to believe to choose you. What tools and processes do they live in. That is the sort of thing I want to see, not where they go on holiday.

Mistake 7. Listing features instead of benefits

Much like personas, b2b marketers people also struggle with value propositions.

Listing features, locations, or how many employees you have is not a value proposition. The best briefs articulate why prospective clients would be interested in your service and why. How will you help them be more successful. What challenges do you solve and how. What does that mean for them as a business and as an individual. Why should they choose you rather than a competitor.

Mistake 8. Hiding constraints until later

Budget, timelines, legal requirements, internal politics, technical limits. These things exist whether you write them down or not. Leaving them out of the brief does not make the work more creative. It just pushes the problem down the road.

Hiding the budget is often framed as being savvy. It rarely is. It just forces people to guess, then compromise decent ideas later when the budget inevitably comes out. That helps no one.

If you cannot share an exact budget, give a range. If you cannot talk about the politics, at least describe the internal perception you will need to overcome. If legal is normally extremely risk averse, flag it early. Give agencies a chance of charting a course through the maze.

Agencies can work within constraints. What they cannot do is plan around information they do not have. Put the reality on the table early. And yes, there are always ways to say the sensitive stuff without spelling it out. Come on. You are marketers. Be creative.

Mistake 9. Being unclear about what is fixed and what is flexible

Many briefs leave agencies guessing about where they can challenge you and where they cannot. Is the message locked. Is the channel fixed. Is the timeline immovable.

If everything feels fixed, you will get safe work. If nothing feels fixed, you will get confusion. A good brief separates non negotiables from areas where thinking is welcome.

Mistake 10. Forgetting to say how you will choose

If this is a pitch, one of the biggest mistakes is not explaining how decisions will be made. What matters most. Thinking or polish. Experience or fresh perspective. Chemistry or credentials. Who is involved.

When you do not say this, agencies pitch to whatever they think you secretly want. That rarely ends well. Being clear about how you will choose is basic fairness and improves the quality of responses dramatically.

Mistake 11. Not giving all agencies the same information

I have been a stakeholder in pitches where some agencies were given more information than others. I always call it out. It is not fair and it skews the outcome.

I once had a head of procurement ask me to answer a question from one agency during an RFP process. I was happy to do it, but only if the question and answer were shared with all bidding agencies. They pushed back and said the other agencies should ask better questions if they wanted the extra context.

I reject that thinking. The agency asking good questions is great but my team want the best outcome and we do not have time to play games. Share the information and get to a better result faster.

Mistake 12. Sending the brief and hoping for the best

A brief is not finished when you send the document. Writing it and briefing it are not the same thing. If you do not talk it through, answer questions and confirm shared understanding, you are leaving too much to chance.

Send the brief. Talk them through it. Be prepared to refine it. If you just email a brief, it is a waste of time. You will not get anyone’s best people or best thinking aligned to the brief. And from an agency point of view, I would not want to bid on anything for someone I have not had a conversation with. The best agencies will push back on this. That is one of the ways you spot them.

Mistake 13. Not considering compensating bidders for their time

This may be controversial and not every budget allows it, but I have compensated losing bidders for their time, even if it is a small but meaningful gesture.

Agencies spend real time and expertise responding to your brief. Creative agencies incur real costs. If your budget allows, recognise that. Even if you went in a different direction, you valued their thinking and it helped you get to the right decision. A simple gesture can leave the door open to work together in future, and it is the decent thing to do.

The simple rule that avoids most mistakes

If there is one rule I stick to, it is this. A good marketing brief should make it obvious what is being bought, why it exists, who it is for, what success looks like and how the work will be judged. If any of those are unclear, the brief is not ready yet.

Most briefing mistakes come from rushing, avoiding decisions, and treating the whole thing like an administrative task. Slow down. Decide properly. Write it clearly. It is one of the highest ROI things you can do in b2b marketing.

 

Previous
Next

B2B Marketing United

B2B Marketing United is where serious B2B marketers sharpen their edge, raise their standards, and drive real revenue impact.

Newsletter

Subscribe now to get weekly updates and insight designed to keep you ahead of the curve.

© 2026

All Rights Reserved

B2B Marketing United

B2B Marketing United is where serious B2B marketers sharpen their edge, raise their standards, and drive real revenue impact.

Newsletter

Subscribe now to get weekly updates and insight designed to keep you ahead of the curve.

© 2026

All Rights Reserved

B2B Marketing United

B2B Marketing United is where serious B2B marketers sharpen their edge, raise their standards, and drive real revenue impact.

Newsletter

Subscribe now to get weekly updates and insight designed to keep you ahead of the curve.

© 2026

All Rights Reserved